Abstract
When reviewing developmental biology, it is imperative to mention the main prokaryote model for the study of mechanisms involved in cell growth, cell differentiation and morphogenesis, Myxobacteria. These Gram-negative δ-proteobacteria, mainly associated with surface soil, show a complex life cycle that culminates, when cells are nutritionally deprived, with the formation of multicellular structures termed fruiting bodies. These multicellular structures of different size, shape, and form among the Myxococcales order, can be composed of different cell types including sporulating cells or myxospores, within the fruiting body, and peripheral rods. In addition, some cells seem to undergo a process of autolysis for the benefit of the population by providing nutrients. Fruiting bodies are not static and previously to its maturation, numerous cells can move into and out of cellular aggregates. The regulation of fruiting bodies development involves a complex and non-redundant set of pathways controlled by a wide number of one- or two-component signalling systems, chemotaxis-like systems or extracytoplasmic function (ECF) sigma factors, encoded by their large genome. Also, many protein kinases are implicated at post-transcriptional level. In this chapter, we will travel along the fascinating path of Myxobacteria from their unicellular state to multicellular development that carries implicit mechanisms of social behaviour and motility and therefore cell to cell communication.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albataineh H, Cole Stevens D (2018) Marine myxobacteria: a few good halophiles. Mar Drugs 16(6):209. https://doi.org/10.3390/md16060209
Arnold JW, Shimkets LJ (1988) Cell surface properties correlated with cohesion in Myxococcus xanthus. J Bacteriol 170(12):5771–5777. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.170.12.5771-5777.1988
Bader CD, Panter F, Müller R (2020) In depth natural product discovery - Myxobacterial strains that provided multiple secondary metabolites. Biotechnol Adv 39:107480. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIOTECHADV.2019.107480. Elsevier
Balagam R et al (2014) ‘Myxococcus xanthus gliding motors are elastically coupled to the substrate as predicted by the focal adhesion model of gliding motility. PLoS Comput Biol. Edited by D. E. Whitworth 10(5):e1003619. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003619
Baumann S et al (2014) Cystobactamids: Myxobacterial topoisomerase inhibitors exhibiting potent antibacterial activity. Angew Chem Int Ed 53(52):14605–14609. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201409964
Behmlander RM, Dworkin M (1991) Extracellular fibrils and contact-mediated cell interactions in Myxococcus xanthus. J Bacteriol 173(24):7810–7820. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.173.24.7810-7820.1991
Berleman JE, Kirby JR (2007) Multicellular development in Myxococcus xanthus is stimulated by predator-prey interactions. J Bacteriol 189(15):5675–5682. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00544-07
Berleman JE, Kirby JR (2009) Deciphering the hunting strategy of a bacterial wolfpack. FEMS Microbiol Rev 33(5):942–957. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.2009.00185.x
Berleman JE et al (2006) Rippling is a predatory behavior in Myxococcus xanthus. J Bacteriol 188(16):5888–5895. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00559-06
Berleman JE et al (2008) Predataxis behavior in Myxococcus xanthus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105(44):17127–17132. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0804387105
Berleman JE et al (2011) FrzS regulates social motility in Myxococcus xanthus by controlling exopolysaccharide production. PLoS ONE.. Edited by A. Driks 6(8):e23920. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0023920
Berleman JE et al (2014) The lethal cargo of Myxococcus xanthus outer membrane vesicles. Front Microbiol 5:474. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00474
Berleman JE et al (2016) Exopolysaccharide microchannels direct bacterial motility and organize multicellular behavior. ISME J England 10(11):2620–2632. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2016.60
Black WP, Yang Z (2004) Myxococcus xanthus Chemotaxis homologs DifD and DifG negatively regulate fibril polysaccharide production. J Bacteriol 186(4):1001–1008. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.186.4.1001-1008.2004
Black WP, Xu Q, Yang Z (2006) Type IV pili function upstream of the Dif chemotaxis pathway in Myxococcus xanthus EPS regulation. Mol Microbiol 61(2):447–456. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05230.x
Black WP et al (2010) Phosphorylation and Dephosphorylation among Dif chemosensory proteins essential for exopolysaccharide regulation in Myxococcus xanthus. J Bacteriol 192(17):4267–4274. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00403-10
Black WP et al (2016) The orphan response regulator EpsW is a substrate of the DifE kinase and it regulates exopolysaccharide in Myxococcus xanthus. Sci Rep 5(1):17831. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep17831
Blackhart BD, Zusman DR (1985) ‘Frizzy’ genes of Myxococcus xanthus are involved in control of frequency of reversal of gliding motility. Proc Natl Acad Sci 82(24):8767–8770. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.82.24.8767
Bode HB et al (2002) Big effects from small changes: possible ways to explore Nature’s chemical diversity. Chem Bio Chem 3(7):619. https://doi.org/10.1002/1439-7633(20020703)3:7<619::AID-CBIC619>3.0.CO;2-9
Bowden MG, Kaplan HB (1998) The Myxococcus xanthus lipopolysaccharide O-antigen is required for social motility and multicellular development. Mol Microbiol 30(2):275–284. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2958.1998.01060.x
Buchanan RE (1918) Studies in the classification and nomenclature of the bacteria viii. The subgroups and genera of the actinomycetales. J Bacteriol 3(4):403–406. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.3.4.403-406.1918
Burchard AC, Burchard RP, Kloetzel JA (1977) Intracellular, periodic structures in the gliding bacterium Myxococcus xanthus. J Bacteriol 132(2):666–672. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.132.2.666-672.1977
Cao P et al (2015) How Myxobacteria cooperate. J Mol Biol 427(23):3709–3721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2015.07.022
Cortina NS et al (2012) Myxoprincomide: a natural product from myxococcus xanthus discovered by comprehensive analysis of the secondary metabolome. Angew Chem Int Ed 51(3):811–816. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201106305
Dawid W (2000) Biology and global distribution of myxobacteria in soils. FEMS Microbiol Rev 24(4):403–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-6445(00)00032-2
Ducret A et al (2013) Direct live imaging of cell–cell protein transfer by transient outer membrane fusion in Myxococcus xanthus. eLife 2:e00868. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.00868
Dworkin M (1996) Recent advances in the social and developmental biology of the myxobacteria. Microbiol Rev US 60(1):70–102
Ellehauge E et al (1998) The FruA signal transduction protein provides a checkpoint for the temporal co-ordination of inter- cellular signals in Myxococcus xanthus development. Mol Microbiol 30(4):807–817. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2958.1998.01113.x
Fisher PR (2006) Microbial development. In: Meyers RA (ed) Encyclopedia of molecular cell biology and molecular medicine, vol 8. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, p, Weinheim, pp 289–342. https://doi.org/10.1002/3527600906.mcb.200400144
Fudou R et al (2002) Haliangium ochraceum gen. Nov., sp. nov. and Haliangium tepidum sp. nov.: novel moderately halophilic myxobacteria isolated from coastal saline environments. J Gen Appl Microbiol 48(2):109–115. https://doi.org/10.2323/jgam.48.109
Gerth K, Müller R (2005) Moderately thermophilic Myxobacteria: novel potential for the production of natural products isolation and characterization. Environ Microbiol 7(6):874–880. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00761.x
Gerth K et al (2003) Myxobacteria: proficient producers of novel natural products with various biological activities – past and future biotechnological aspects with the focus on the genus Sorangium. J Biotechnol. Elsevier 106(2–3):233–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2003.07.015
Gibiansky ML et al (2013) Earthquake-like dynamics in Myxococcus xanthus social motility. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110(6):2330–2335. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1215089110
Giglio KM et al (2011) A cascade of coregulating enhancer binding proteins initiates and propagates a multicellular developmental program. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108(32):E431–E439. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1105876108
Goldman BS et al (2006) Evolution of sensory complexity recorded in a myxobacterial genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci 103(41):15200–15205. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0607335103
Goldman B, Bhat S, Shimkets LJ (2007) Genome evolution and the emergence of fruiting body development in Myxococcus xanthus. PLoS ONE. Edited by J. Petrosino 2(12):e1329. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0001329
Gronewold TMA, Kaiser D (2002) Act operon control of developmental gene expression in Myxococcus xanthus. J Bacteriol 184(4):1172–1179. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.184.4.1172-1179.2002
Gronewold TMA, Kaiser D (2007) Mutations of the act promoter in Myxococcus xanthus. J Bacteriol 189(5):1836–1844. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.01618-06
Herrmann J, Fayad AA, Müller R (2017) Natural products from myxobacteria: novel metabolites and bioactivities. Nat Prod Rep 34(2):135–160. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6NP00106H
Hodgkin J, Kaiser D (1979) Genetics of gliding motility in Myxococcus xanthus (Myxobacterales): two gene systems control movement. MGG Mol Gen Genet 171(2):177–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00270004
Huntley S et al (2011) Comparative genomic analysis of fruiting body formation in myxococcales. Mol Biol Evol 28(2):1083–1097. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msq292
Iizuka T, Jojima Y, Fudou R, Tokura M et al (2003) Enhygromyxa Salina gen. Nov., sp. nov., a slightly Halophilic Myxobacterium isolated from the coastal areas of Japan. Syst Appl Microbiol 26(2):189–196. https://doi.org/10.1078/072320203322346038
Islam ST, Mignot T (2015) The mysterious nature of bacterial surface (gliding) motility: a focal adhesion-based mechanism in Myxococcus xanthus. Semin Cell Dev Biol 46:143–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2015.10.033
Jakobczak B et al (2015) Contact- and protein transfer-dependent stimulation of assembly of the gliding motility machinery in Myxococcus xanthus. PLOS Genet. Edited by W. F. Burkholder 11(7):e1005341. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005341
Jelsbak L, Givskov M, Kaiser D (2005) Enhancer-binding proteins with a forkhead-associated domain and the 54 regulon in Myxococcus xanthus fruiting body development. Proc Natl Acad Sci 102(8):3010–3015. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0409371102
Jiang DM et al (2007) Fruiting and non-fruiting myxobacteria: a phylogenetic perspective of cultured and uncultured members of this group. Mol Phylogenet Evol 44(2):545–552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2007.04.004
Kahnt J et al (2010) Profiling the outer membrane proteome during growth and development of the social bacterium Myxococcus xanthus by selective Biotinylation and analyses of outer membrane vesicles. J Proteome Res 9(10):5197–5208. https://doi.org/10.1021/pr1004983
Kaiser D (1979) Social gliding is correlated with the presence of pili in Myxococcus xanthus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 76(11):5952–5956. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.76.11.5952
Kaiser D (2004) Signaling in myxobacteria. Annu Rev Microbiol 58(1):75–98. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.micro.58.030603.123620. Annual Reviews
Kaiser D, Warrick H (2014) Transmission of a signal that synchronizes cell movements in swarms of Myxococcus xanthus. Proc Natl Acad Sci 111(36):13105–13110. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1411925111
Kaiser D, Robinson M, Kroos L (2010) Myxobacteria, polarity, and multicellular morphogenesis. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2(8):a000380. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a000380
Kaplan HB (2003) Multicellular development and gliding motility in Myxococcus xanthus. Curr Opin Microbiol 6:572–577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mib.2003.10.006. Elsevier
Keilberg D et al (2012) A response regulator interfaces between the Frz chemosensory system and the MglA/MglB GTPase/GAP module to regulate polarity in Myxococcus xanthus. PLoS Genet. Edited by P. H. Viollier 8(9):e1002951. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1002951
Konovalova A, Löbach S, Søgaard-Andersen L (2012) A RelA-dependent two-tiered regulated proteolysis cascade controls synthesis of a contact-dependent intercellular signal in Myxococcus xanthus. Mol Microbiol 84(2):260–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2012.08020.x
Krug D et al (2008) Discovering the hidden secondary metabolome of Myxococcus xanthus: a study of intraspecific diversity. Appl Environ Microbiol 74(10):3058–3068. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02863-07
Kuspa A, Plamann L, Kaiser D (1992) A-signalling and the cell density requirement for Myxococcus xanthus development. J Bacteriol 174(22):7360–7369. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.174.22.7360-7369.1992
Leonardy S et al (2007) Coupling of protein localization and cell movements by a dynamically localized response regulator in Myxococcus xanthus. EMBO J 26(21):4433–4444. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7601877
Li Y-Z et al (2002) A simple method to isolate salt-tolerant myxobacteria from marine samples. J Microbiol Methods 50(2):205–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7012(02)00029-5
Li Y et al (2003) Extracellular polysaccharides mediate pilus retraction during social motility of Myxococcus xanthus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100(9):5443–5448. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0836639100
Lobedanz S, Søgaard-Andersen L (2003) Identification of the C-signal, a contact-dependent morphogen coordinating multiple developmental responses in Myxococcus xanthus. Genes Dev 17(17):2151–2161. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.274203
Luciano J et al (2011) Emergence and modular evolution of a novel motility machinery in Bacteria. PLoS Genet. Edited by J. Casadesús 7(9):e1002268. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1002268
Lünsdorf H, Schairer HU (1989) Frozen motion of gliding bacteria outlines inherent features of the motility apparatus. Microbiology 147(4):939–947. https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-147-4-939
MacRae TH, McCurdy HD (1976) Evidence for motility-related fimbriae in the gliding microorganism Myxococcus xanthus. Can J Microbiol 22(10):1589–1593. https://doi.org/10.1139/m76-234
Mauriello EMF et al (2010) Bacterial motility complexes require the actin-like protein, MreB and the Ras homologue, MglA. EMBO J 29(2):315–326. https://doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2009.356
McBride MJ (2001) Bacterial gliding motility: multiple mechanisms for cell movement over surfaces. Annu Rev Microbiol 55(1):49–75. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.micro.55.1.49
McBride MJ, Zusman DR (1996) Behavioral analysis of single cells of Myxococcus xanthus in response to prey cells of Escherichia coli. FEMS Microbiol Lett. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 137(2–3):227–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1097(96)00062-6
Mercier R et al (2020) The polar Ras-like GTPase MglA activates type IV pilus via SgmX to enable twitching motility in Myxococcus xanthus. Proc Nat Acad Sci 117(45):28366–28373. https://doi.org/10.1073/PNAS.2002783117
Mignot T (2007) The elusive engine in Myxococcus xanthus gliding motility. Cell Mol Life Sci 64(21):2733–2745. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-007-7176-x
Mignot T et al (2007) Evidence that focal adhesion complexes power bacterial gliding motility. Science 315(5813):853–856. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1137223
Mittal S, Kroos L (2009a) A combination of unusual transcription factors binds cooperatively to control Myxococcus xanthus developmental gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106(6):1965–1970. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0808516106
Mittal S, Kroos L (2009b) Combinatorial regulation by a novel arrangement of FruA and MrpC2 transcription factors during Myxococcus xanthus development. J Bacteriol 191(8):2753–2763. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.01818-08
Moak PL et al (2015) The Hsp70-like StkA functions between T4P and Dif signaling proteins as a negative regulator of exopolysaccharide in Myxococcus xanthus. PeerJ 3:e747. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.747
Mohr K (2018) ‘Diversity of Myxobacteria—we only see the tip of the iceberg. Microorganisms 6(3):84. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms6030084
Muñoz-Dorado J et al (2016) Myxobacteria: Moving, killing, feeding, and surviving together. Front Microbiol 7(May):1–18. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.00781
Nan B, Zusman DR (2011) Uncovering the mystery of gliding motility in the Myxobacteria. Annu Rev Genet 45(1):21–39. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-genet-110410-132547
Nan B et al (2010) A multi-protein complex from Myxococcus xanthus required for bacterial gliding motility. Mol Microbiol 76(6):1539–1554. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07184.x
Nan B et al (2011) Myxobacteria gliding motility requires cytoskeleton rotation powered by proton motive force. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108(6):2498–2503. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1018556108
Nan B et al (2014) Bacteria that glide with helical tracks. Curr Biol 24(4):R169–R173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2013.12.034
Nariya H, Inouye M (2008) MazF, an mRNA Interferase, mediates programmed cell death during multicellular Myxococcus development. Cell 132(1):55–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2007.11.044
Nudleman E, Wall D, Kaiser D (2006) Polar assembly of the type IV pilus secretin in Myxococcus xanthus. Mol Microbiol 60(1):16–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05095.x
O’Connor KA, Zusman DR (1991) Development in Myxococcus xanthus involves differentiation into two cell types, peripheral rods and spores. J Bacteriol 173(11):3318–3333. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.173.11.3318-3333.1991
Parte AC et al (2020) List of prokaryotic names with standing in Nomenclature (LPSN) moves to the DSMZ. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 70(11):5607–5612. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.004332
Pathak DT, Wall D (2012) Identification of the cglC, cglD, cglE, and cglF genes and their role in cell contact-dependent gliding motility in Myxococcus xanthus. J Bacteriol 194(8):1940–1949. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00055-12
Pathak DT et al (2013) Molecular recognition by a polymorphic cell surface receptor governs cooperative behaviors in Bacteria. PLoS Genet. Edited by C. S. Hayes 9(11):e1003891. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003891
Pérez J et al (2014) Rhizobial galactoglucan determines the predatory pattern of Myxococcus xanthus and protects Sinorhizobium meliloti from predation. Environ Microbiol 16(7):2341–2350. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.12477
Rajagopalan R et al (2014) Developmental gene regulation. In: Yang Z, Higgs P (eds) Myxobacteria: genomics, cellular and molecular biology. Caister Academic Press, Norfolk, pp 105–126
Rana N et al (2019) Isolation and characterization of soil Myxobacteria from Nepal. J Inst Sci Technol 24(2):7–16. https://doi.org/10.3126/jist.v24i2.27246
Reichenbach H (1999) The ecology of the myxobacteria. Environ Microbiol 1(1):15–21. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1462-2920.1999.00016.x
Reichenbach H, Dworkin M (1992) The Myxobacteria. In: The prokaryotes. New York, NY, Springer, pp 3416–3487. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2191-1_26
Reichenbach H, Höfle G (1993) Biologically active secondary metabolites from myxobacteria. Biotechnol Adv 11(2):219–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/0734-9750(93)90042-L
Remis JP et al (2014) Bacterial social networks: structure and composition of Myxococcus xanthus outer membrane vesicle chains. Environ Microbiol 16(2):598–610. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.12187
Schumacher D, Søgaard-Andersen L (2017) Regulation of cell polarity in motility and cell division in Myxococcus xanthus. Annu Rev Microbiol 71(1):61–78. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-micro-102215-095415
Shi W, Zusman DR (1993) The two motility systems of Myxococcus xanthus show different selective advantages on various surfaces. Proc Natl Acad Sci 90(8):3378–3382. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.90.8.3378
Shi W, Köhler T, Zusman DR (1993) Chemotaxis plays a role in the social behaviour of Myxococcus xanthus. Mol Microbiol 9(3):601–611. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.1993.tb01720.x
Sun M et al (2011) Motor-driven intracellular transport powers bacterial gliding motility. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108(18):7559–7564. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1101101108
Sun H, Shi W (2001) Analyses of mrp genes during Myxococcus xanthus development. J Bacteriol 183(23):6733–6739. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.183.23.6733-6739.2001
Thaxter R (1892) On the Myxobacteriaceæ, a new order of Schizomycetes. Bot Gaz 17(12):389–406. https://doi.org/10.1086/326866
Thiery S, Kaimer C (2020) The predation strategy of Myxococcus xanthus. Front Microbiol 11:2. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.00002
Ueki T, Inouye S (2003) Identification of an activator protein required for the induction of fruA, a gene essential for fruiting body development in Myxococcus xanthus. Proc Natl Acad Sci 100(15):8782–8787. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1533026100
Ueki T, Inouye S (2005) Activation of a development-specific Gene, dofA, by FruA, an essential transcription factor for development of Myxococcus xanthus. J Bacteriol 187(24):8504–8506. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.187.24.8504-8506.2005
Velicer GJ, Yu Y-TN (2003) Evolution of novel cooperative swarming in the bacterium Myxococcus xanthus. Nature England 425(6953):75–78. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01908
Wang B et al (2007) Adaptation of salt-tolerant Myxococcus strains and their motility systems to the ocean conditions. Microb Ecol 54(1):43–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-006-9169-y
Ward MJ, Zusman DR (1997) Regulation of directed motility in Myxococcus xanthus. Mol Microbiol England 24(5):885–893
Ward MJ, Zusman DR (1999) Motility in Myxococcus xanthus and its role in developmental aggregation. Curr Opin Microbiol England 2(6):624–629
Ward MJ, Lew H, Zusman DR (2000) Social motility in Myxococcus xanthus requires FrzS, a protein with an extensive coiled-coil domain. Mol Microbiol 37(6):1357–1371. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.02079.x
Weimer RM et al (1998) A chaperone in the HSP70 family controls production of extracellular fibrils in Myxococcus xanthus. J Bacteriol 180(20):5357–5368. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.180.20.5357-5368.1998
Whitworth DE (2011) ‘Myxobacterial vesicles. Death at a distance? Adv Appl Microbiol. Academic Press Inc 75:1–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-387046-9.00001-3
Whitworth DE, Cock PJA (2008) Two-component systems of the myxobacteria: structure, diversity and evolutionary relationships. Microbiology 154(2):360–372. https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.2007/013672-0
Wireman JW, Dworkin M (1977) Developmentally induced autolysis during fruiting body formation by Myxococcus xanthus. J Bacteriol 129:796–802. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.129.2.798-802.1977
Wolgemuth C et al (2002) How myxobacteria glide. Curr Biol 12(5):369–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822(02)00716-9
Wrótniak-Drzewiecka W et al (2016) Current trends in myxobacteria research. Ann Microbiol 66(1):17–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13213-015-1104-3
Yang Z, Geng Y, Shi W (1998) A DnaK homolog in Myxococcus xanthus is involved in social motility and fruiting body formation. J Bacteriol 180(2):218–224. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.180.2.218-224.1998
Yang Z et al (2000) Myxococcus xanthus dif genes are required for biogenesis of cell surface fibrils essential for social gliding motility. J Bacteriol 182(20):5793–5798. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.182.20.5793-5798.2000
Yang R et al (2004) AglZ is a filament-forming coiled-coil protein required for adventurous gliding motility of Myxococcus xanthus. J Bacteriol 186(18):6168–6178. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.186.18.6168-6178.2004
Youderian P et al (2003) Identification of genes required for adventurous gliding motility in Myxococcus xanthus with the transposable element mariner. Mol Microbiol 49(2):555–570. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03582.x
Yu R, Kaiser D (2007) Gliding motility and polarized slime secretion. Mol Microbiol 63(2):454–467. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05536.x
Zhang L et al (2003) Improved methods of isolation and purification of myxobacteria and development of fruiting body formation of two strains. J Microbiol Methods 54(1):21–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7012(02)00257-9
Zhang Y-q et al (2005) Characteristics and living patterns of marine Myxobacterial isolates. Appl Environ Microbiol 71(6):3331–3336. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.71.6.3331-3336.2005
Zhang Y et al (2010) A bacterial Ras-like small GTP-binding protein and its cognate GAP establish a dynamic spatial polarity Axis to control directed motility. PLoS Biol. Edited by M. T. Laub 8(7):e1000430. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000430
Zhou T, Nan B (2017) Exopolysaccharides promote Myxococcus xanthus social motility by inhibiting cellular reversals. Mol Microbiol England 103(4):729–743. https://doi.org/10.1111/mmi.13585
Zhou X et al (2014) Myxobacterial community is a predominant and highly diverse bacterial group in soil niches. Environ Microbiol Rep 6(1):45–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-2229.12107
Zusman DR et al (2007) Chemosensory pathways, motility and development in Myxococcus xanthus. Nat Rev Microbiol 5(11):862–872. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro1770
Acknowledgement
S.S. owes a debt of gratitude to the co-authors with special mention to the editors T. G. Villa and T. de Miguel, for making me part of this book and to Alejandra Carril Sánchez for providing us with a drawing that we wanted to introduce as Fig. 7 in this chapter.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sánchez, S. et al. (2021). The Incredible Path of Myxobacteria Towards Aggregative Multicellularity. In: Villa, T.G., de Miguel Bouzas, T. (eds) Developmental Biology in Prokaryotes and Lower Eukaryotes. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77595-7_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77595-7_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-77594-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-77595-7
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)