Business Models for Sustainable Development: The Case of a Kenyan Sustainable Enterprise

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Responsible Management in Emerging Markets

Part of the book series: Sustainable Development Goals Series ((SDGS))

  • 673 Accesses

Abstract

Globally, companies are transitioning from environmentally destructive business practices to ones that are more sustainable. New forms of hybrid organisations are also emerging, pursuing multiple objectives simultaneously (e.g., social, economic, and environmental) and implementing divergent processes to achieve their sustainable development missions. This chapter examines a sustainable enterprise in East Africa. It aims to understand how such an enterprise can build a business model to contribute to environmental, societal, and economic transformation. We report the findings of in-depth case study research with the Kenyan sustainable enterprise Corec. Based in Kariobangi (a slum in Nairobi), Corec aims to provide opportunities for marginalised youths through the collection and recycling of waste plastics from slums and dum** sites which are then transformed into building materials and sold to developers and construction companies. The results of this research reveal two important phases by which a sustainable enterprise develops and achieves its triple bottom line mission. First, it builds a business model in which the three mission dimensions (social, environmental, and economic) are intertwined. Second, it innovates business model components to grow and further achieve the sustainable development mission. By providing insights on how sustainable enterprises can effectively build business models to achieve their triple objectives, we contribute to sustainable entrepreneurship and hybrid organisation scholarship on Africa. Limitations and areas for future research are also offered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • African Economic Outlook. (2019). African Economic Outlook. Retrieved November 10, 2020, from https://www.africaneconomicoutlook.org/

  • Anderson, J., & Billou, N. (2007). Serving the world’s poor: Innovation at the base of the economic pyramid. Journal of Business Strategy, 28(2), 14–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bansal, S., Garg, I., & Sharma, G. D. (2019). Social entrepreneurship as a path for social change and driver of sustainable development: A systematic review and research agenda. Sustainability, 11(4), 1091.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battilana, J., Besharov, M., & Mitzinneck, B. (2017). On hybrids and hybrid organizing: A review and roadmap for future research. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, T. B. Lawrence, & R. E. Meyer (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (2nd ed., pp. 133–169). SAGE Publications Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battilana, J., Sengul, M., Pache, A. C., & Model, J. (2015). Harnessing productive tensions in hybrid organizations: The case of work integration social enterprises. Academy of Management Journal, 58(6), 1658–1685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, P. N., & Smith, B. R. (2010). Identifying the drivers of social entrepreneurial impact: Theoretical development and an exploratory empirical test of SCALERS. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 1(1), 126–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bocken, N. M., Fil, A., & Prabhu, J. (2016). Scaling up social businesses in develo** markets. Journal of Cleaner Production, 139, 295–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bocken, N. S., Short, R. P., & Evans, S. (2014). A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 42–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boons, F., & Lüdeke-Freund, F. (2013). Business models for sustainable innovation: State-of-the-art and steps towards a research agenda. Journal of Cleaner Production, 45, 9–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • British Council. (2017). The state of social enterprise in Kenya. Retrieved November 10, 2020, from https://www.britishcouncil.org/sites/default/files/state_of_social_enterprise_in_kenya_british_council_final.pdf

  • Ciambotti, G. (2020). Social entrepreneurship and scaling strategies for poverty alleviation. In W. Leal Filho, A. M. Azul, L. Brandli, A. Lange Salvia, P. G. Özuyar, & T. Wall (Eds.), No poverty. Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciambotti, G., Littlewood, D., Sottini, A., & M’ithiria, E. N. (2020). Building and scaling social enterprise business models for BOP markets in Kenya. In J. Muthuri, M. Arnold, G. Stefan, & F. **mena (Eds.), Base of the Pyramid markets in Africa (pp. 199–227). Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ciambotti, G., & Pedrini, M. (2021). Hybrid harvesting strategies to overcome resource constraints: Evidence from social enterprises in Kenya. Journal of Business Ethics, 168(3), 631–650. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04256-y

  • Davies, I. A., & Chambers, L. (2018). Integrating hybridity and business model theory in sustainable entrepreneurship. Journal of Cleaner Production, 177, 378–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dees, G. J., Anderson, B. B., & Wei-Skillern, J. (2002). Pathways to social impact: Strategies for scaling out successful social innovations. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dees, G. J., Anderson, B. B., & Wei-Skillern, J. (2004). Scaling Social Impact Strategies for spreading social innovations. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 24–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobson, A. (2007). Environmental citizenship: Towards sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 15(5), 276–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doherty, B., Haugh, H., & Lyon, F. (2014). Social enterprises as hybrid organizations: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 16(4), 417–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doherty, B., Haugh, H., Sahan, E., Wills, T., & Croft, S. (2020). Creating the new economy: Business models that put people and planet first. Retrieved November 10, 2020, from https://traidcraftexchange.org/policy-resources/2020/1/22/creating-the-new-economy-business-models-that-put-people-and-planet-first

  • Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ensuring access to affordable, reliable, sustainable, and modern energy for all. (n.d.). Retrieved from: https://sdgs.un.org/goals/goal7

  • Evans, S., Vladimirova, D., Holgado, M., Van Fossen, K., Yang, M., Silva, E. A., & Barlow, C. Y. (2017). Business model innovation for sustainability: Towards a unified perspective for creation of sustainable business models. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26, 597–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fielt, E. (2013). Conceptualising business models: Definitions, frameworks and classifications. Journal of Business Models, 1(1), 85–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gehman, J., Glaser, V. L., Eisenhardt, K. M., Gioia, D., Langley, A., & Corley, K. G. (2018). Finding theory–method fit: A comparison of three qualitative approaches to theory building. Journal of Management Inquiry, 27(3), 284–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, R., Spieth, P., & Ince, I. (2018). Business model design in sustainable entrepreneurship: Illuminating the commercial logic of hybrid businesses. Journal of Cleaner Production, 176, 439–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J., & Wagner, M. (2012). Integrating sustainability into firms’ processes: Performance effects and the moderating role of business models and innovation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 21(3), 183–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S., Sharma, S., & Halme, M. (2016). Poverty, business and sustainable development. Organization and Environment, 29(4), 401–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hockerts, K. (2006). Introduction to Part IV—Ecopreneurship: Unique research field or Just ‘More of the same’? In J. Mair, G. Robinson, & K. Hockerts (Eds.), Social entrepreneurship (pp. 209–213). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hockerts, K., & Wüstenhagen, R. (2010). Greening Goliaths versus emerging Davids. Theorizing about the role of incumbents and new entrants in sustainable entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(5), 481–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt, D., & Littlewood, D. (2015). Identifying, map**, and monitoring the impact of hybrid firms. California Management Review, 57(3), 107–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt, D., & Littlewood, D. (2017). Waste livelihoods amongst the poor—Through the lens of bricolage. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(2), 253–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Islam, S. M. (2020). Towards an integrative definition of scaling social impact in social enterprises. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2020.e00164

  • Johnson, M. P., & Schaltegger, S. (2019). Entrepreneurship for sustainable development: A review and multilevel causal mechanism framework. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 44(6). https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258719885368

  • Joyce, A., & Paquin, R. L. (2016). The triple layered business model canvas: A tool to design more sustainable business models. Journal of Cleaner Production, 135, 1474–1486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, R., Koh, H., & Karamchandani, A. (2012). From blueprint to scale: The case for philanthropy in impact investing. Retrieved November 10, 2020, from https://acumen.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/From-Blueprint-to-Scale-Case-for-Philanthropy-in-Impact-Investing_Full-report.pdf

  • Littlewood, D., & Holt, D. (2018). How social enterprises can contribute to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)—A conceptual framework. In N. Apostolopoulos, H. Al-Dajani, D. Holt, P. Jones, & R. Newbery (Eds.), Entrepreneurship and the Sustainable Development Goals (pp. 33–46). Emerald. ISBN 9781787563766.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lüdeke-Freund, F. (2010). Towards a conceptual framework of ‘business models for sustainability’. In R. Wever, J. Quist, A. Tukker, J. Woudstra, F. Boons, & N. Beute (Eds.), Knowledge collaboration & learning for sustainable innovation (pp. 25–29). Delft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mair, J., & Marti, I. (2006). Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction, and delight. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 36–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minniti, M., & Bygrave, W. (2001). A dynamic model of entrepreneurial learning. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25(3), 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD/EU. (2017). Boosting social enterprise development: Good practice compendium. OECD Publishing. [Viewed November 10, 2020]. http://www.oecd.org/publications/boosting-social-enterprise-development-9789264268500-en.htm

  • Oxfam. (2017). An Economy for the 99%: It’s time to build a human economy that benefits everyone, not just the privileged few. Oxfam GB. Retrieved November 10, 2020, from https://www.oxfam.org/en/research/economy-99

  • Polak, P. (2009). Out of poverty. Berrett-Koehler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. K., & Hammond, A. (2002). Serving the world’s poor, profitably. Harvard Business Review, 80(9), 48–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. K., & Hart, S. L. (2002). The fortune at the bottom of the pyramid. Strategy + Business, 26, pp. 2–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saebi, T., Foss, N. J., & Linder, S. (2019). Social entrepreneurship research: Past achievements and future promises. Journal of Management, 45(1), 70–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santos, F., Pache, A. C., & Birkholz, C. (2015). Making hybrids work: Aligning business models and organizational design for social enterprises. California Management Review, 57(3), 36–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaltegger, S., Lüdeke-Freund, F., & Hansen, E. G. (2016). Business models for sustainability: A co-evolutionary analysis of sustainable entrepreneurship, innovation, and transformation. Organization & Environment, 29(3), 264–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seelos, C., & Mair, J. (2005). Social entrepreneurship: Creating new business models to serve the poor. Business Horizons, 48(3), 241–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sgrò, F., Ciambotti, G., Bontis, N., & Ayiku, A. (2020). Intellectual capital in East and West African social enterprises. Knowledge and Process Management, 27(4), 332–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, W. K., & Lewis, M. W. (2011). Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 381–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J. (2010). Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 172–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J. (2018). Business models and dynamic capabilities. Long Range Planning, 51(1), 40–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warnecke, T., & Houndonougbo, A. N. (2016). Let there be light: Social enterprise, solar power, and sustainable development. Journal of Economic Issues, 50(2), 362–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weerawardena, J., Salunke, S., Haigh, N., & Mort, G. S. (2019). Business model innovation in social purpose organizations: Conceptualizing dual social-economic value creation. Journal of Business Research, 125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.10.016

  • Yunus, M., Moingeon, B., & Lehmann-Ortega, L. (2010). Building social business models: Lessons from the Grameen experience. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 308–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zott, C., Amit, R., & Massa, L. (2011). The business model: Recent developments and future research. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1019–1042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giacomo Ciambotti .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ciambotti, G., Sottini, A., Littlewood, D., Meru, A.K. (2021). Business Models for Sustainable Development: The Case of a Kenyan Sustainable Enterprise. In: Adae, E.K., Kosiba, J.P.B., Hinson, R.E., Twum, K.K., Newman, N., Nutsugah, F.F. (eds) Responsible Management in Emerging Markets. Sustainable Development Goals Series. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76563-7_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation