SpringerLink
Log in

Subjectivity, Responsibility, and Choice

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sex-Work, Prostitution and Policy

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Science, Knowledge and Policy ((SKP))

  • 656 Accesses

Abstract

The contested ontological and normative status of women’s autonomous capacities has long been a central feature of feminist sex-work/prostitution debates (Benedet 2013; Davidson 1995; MacKinnon 2011; Meyers 2014; Miriam 2005; Nussbaum 1998).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Assiter, Alison. 2013. “Kierkegaard and Vulnerability.” In Vulnerability, edited by M. A. Fineman and A. Grear. Farnham, Surrey, England and Burlington, VT: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacchi, Carol. 2005. “Discourse, Discourse Everywhere: Subject ‘Agency’ in Feminist Discourse Methodology.” NORA—Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research 13 (3): 198–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/08038740600600407.

  • Barnett, Clive, Nick Clarke, Paul Cloke, and Alice Malpass. 2008. “The Elusive Subjects of Neo-Liberalism: Beyond the Analytics of Governmentality.” Cultural Studies 22 (5):624–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380802245902.

  • Benedet, Janine. 2013. “Marital Rape, Polygamy, and Prostitution: Trading Sex Equality for Agency and Choice?” Review of Constitutional Studies 18 (2): 161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benford, Robert D., and David A. Snow. 2000. “Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment.” Annual Review of Sociology 26: 611–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biebricher, Thomas, and Eric Vance Johnson. 2012. “What’s Wrong with Neoliberalism?” New Political Science 34 (2): 202–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/07393148.2012.676398.

  • Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Edited by J. Goody. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre. 2001. Masculine Domination. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Wendy. 2003. “Neo-Liberalism and the End of Liberal Democracy.” Theory & Event 7 (1). https://doi.org/10.1353/tae.2003.0020.

  • Butler, Judith. 2016. Frames of War: When Is Life Grievable? Brooklyn: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cahill, Ann J. 2000. “Foucault, Rape, and the Construction of the Feminine Body.” Hypatia 15 (1): 43–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherry, April L. 1996. “Social Contract Theory, Welfare Reform, Race, and the Male Sex-Right.” Oregon Law Review 75: 1037.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christman, John. 2001. “Liberalism, Autonomy, and Self-Transformation.” Social Theory and Practice 27 (2): 185–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comte, Jacqueline. 2013. “Decriminalization of Sex Work: Feminist Discourses in Light of Research.” Sexuality & Culture 18 (1): 196–217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-013-9174-5.

  • Corbett, Steve, and Alan Walker. 2012. “The Big Society: Back to the Future.” Political Quarterly 83 (3): 487–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-923x.2012.02338.x.

  • Cossman, Brenda. 2002. Disciplining the Unruly: Sexual Outlaws, Little Sisters and the Legacy of Butler. SSRN Scholarly Paper. ID 2350992. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, Julia O’Connell. 1995. “The Anatomy of ‘Free Choice’ Prostitution.” Gender, Work & Organization 2 (1): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.1995.tb00022.x.

  • Davidson, Julia O’Connell. 1998. Prostitution, Power and Freedom. London: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, Mitchell M. 2009. Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society. 2nd ed. London and Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driscoll, A., and Ml Krook. 2012. “Feminism and Rational Choice Theory.” European Political Science Review 4 (2): 195–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easteal, Patricia, Lorana Bartels, and Sally Bradford. 2012. “Language, Gender and ‘Reality’: Violence against Women.” International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice 40 (4): 324–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2012.05.001.

  • Ells, Carolyn. 2003. “Foucault, Feminism, and Informed Choice.” Journal of Medical Humanities 24 (3/4): 213–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, Lars O. 1980. “Charges Against Prostitution: An Attempt at a Philosophical Assessment.” Ethics 90 (3): 335–66. https://doi.org/10.1086/292165.

  • Fairclough, Norman. 2013. “Critical Discourse Analysis and Critical Policy Studies.” Critical Policy Studies 7 (2): 177–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2013.798239.

  • Fineman, Martha Albertson. 2008. “The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition.” Yale Journal of Law & Feminism 20 (1): 8–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fricker, Miranda. 2007. Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grenfell, Michael, ed. 2012. Pierre Bourdieu: Key Concepts. 2nd ed. Durham: Acumen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosz, E. A. 1994. Volatile Bodies: Toward a Corporeal Feminism. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, Donna. 1985. A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology and Socialist-Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hee-Kang Kim. 2004. “Choice, Responsibility, and the Autonomy of Women.” In Conference Papers—American Political Science Association, 1–21. American Political Science Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewer, Rebecca. 2019. “Vulnerability and the Consenting Subject: Reimagining Informed Consent in Embryo Donation.” Feminist Legal Studies 27 (3): 287–310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-019-09414-1.

  • Howe, Adrian. 2006. “New Policies for Battered Women: Negotiating the Local and the Global in Blair’s Britain.” Policy & Politics 34 (3): 407–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard, Phil. 2004. “Revenge and Injustice in the Neoliberal City: Uncovering Masculinist Agendas.” Antipode 36 (4): 665–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Sarah. 2021. “UK Sex Workers Face Rising Violence and Hardship during Pandemic.” The Guardian. Retrieved February 15, 2021 (http://www.theguardian.com/society/2021/jan/29/uk-sex-workers-rising-violence-hardship-pandemic).

  • Kapur, Rarna. 2002. “Tragedy of Victimization Rhetoric: Ressurecting the ‘Native’ Subject in International/Post-Colonial Feminist Legal Politics.” Harvard Human Rights Journal 15: 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, Liz, and Jill Radford. 1995. “‘Nothing Really Happened’: The Invalidation of Women’s Experience of Sexual Violence.” In Women, Violence and Male Power: Feminist Research, Activism and Practice, edited by M. Hester, L. Kelly, and J. Radford. Buckingham and Philadelphia: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khader, Serene J. 2019. Decolonizing Universalism: A Transnational Feminist Ethic. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leon, Chrysanthi S., and Corey S. Shdaimah. 2012. “JUSTifying Scrutiny: State Power in Prostitution Diversion Programs.” Journal of Poverty 16 (3): 250–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/10875549.2012.695539.

  • Lissovoy, Noah De. 2013. “Conceptualizing the Carceral Turn: Neoliberalism, Racism, and Violation.” Critical Sociology 39 (5): 739–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920512452162.

  • Mackenzie, Catriona, and Natalie Stoljar. 2000. Relational Autonomy: Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy, Agency, and the Social Self. Cary, NC: Oxford University Press, Incorporated.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, Catherine A. 1989. “Sexuality, Pornography, and Method:” Pleasure under Patriarchy.” Ethics 99 (2):314–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, Catherine A. 2011. “Trafficking, Prostitution, and Inequality.” Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review 46: 271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manton, Karl. 2012. “Habitus.” In Pierre Bourdieu: Key Concepts, edited by M. Grenfell. Durham: Acumen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, Roger. 2008. Prostitution, Politics and Policy. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon and New York: Routledge-Cavendish.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNay, Lois. 1999. “Gender, Habitus and the Field Pierre Bourdieu and the Limits of Reflexivity.” Theory, Culture & Society 16 (1): 95–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/026327699016001007.

  • Meyers, Diana. 2010. “Feminist Perspectives on the Self.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by E. N. Zalta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyers, Diana. 2014. “Feminism and Sex Trafficking: Rethinking Some Aspects of Autonomy and Paternalism.” Ethical Theory & Moral Practice 17 (3): 427–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-013-9452-1.

  • Miriam, Kathy. 2005. “Stop** the Traffic in Women: Power, Agency and Abolition in Feminist Debates over Sex-Trafficking.” Journal of Social Philosophy 36 (1): 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munro, Vanessa E., and Jane Scoular. 2012. “Abusing Vulnerability? Contemporary Law and Policy Responses to Sex Work in the UK.” Feminist Legal Studies 20 (3): 189–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-012-9213-x.

  • Nedelsky, Jennifer. 1989. “Reconceiving Autonomy: Sources, Thoughts and Possibilities.” Yale Journal of Law and Feminism 1: 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, Martha C. 1998. “‘Whether from Reason or Prejudice’: Taking Money for Bodily Services.” The Journal of Legal Studies 27 (S2): 693–723.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, Maggie. 2010. “Cultural Criminology and Sex Work: Resisting Regulation through Radical Democracy and Participatory Action Research (PAR).” Journal of Law and Society 37 (1): 210–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oksala, Johanna. 2013. “Feminism and Neoliberal Governmentality.” Foucault Studies (16): 32–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Overall, Christine. 1992. “What’s Wrong with Prostitution? Evaluating Sex Work.” Signs 17 (4): 705–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pateman, Carole. 1983. “Defending Prostitution: Charges Against Ericsson.” Ethics 93 (3): 561–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pateman, Carole. 1988. The Sexual Contract. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pathak, Pathik. 2013. “From New Labour to New Conservatism: The Changing Dynamics of Citizenship as Self-Government.” Citizenship Studies 17 (1): 61–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2012.716215.

  • Phoenix, Joanna. 2005. Illicit and Illegal: Sex, Regulation, and Social Control. Uffculme, Cullompton, Devon and Portland, OR: Willan Pub.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, John. 2011. “Governing Prostitution: Differentiating the Bad from the Bad.” Current Issues in Criminal Justice 23: 53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scoular, Jane. 2015. The Subject of Prostitution: Sex Work, Law and Social Theory. Revised ed. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart, Carol. 1990. “Law’s Power, the Sexed Body, and Feminist Discourse.” Journal of Law and Society 17 (2): 194–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stringer, Rebecca. 2014. Knowing Victims: Feminism, Agency and Victim Politics in Neoliberal Times. Hove, East Sussex: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tadros, Victor. 2011. “Consent to Harm.” Current Legal Problems 64 (1): 23–49. https://doi.org/10.1093/clp/cur004.

  • Weitzer, Ronald. 2010. “The Movement to Criminalize Sex Work in the United States.” Journal of Law and Society 37 (1): 61–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Rhys H. 1995. “Constructing the Public Good: Social Movements and Cultural Resources.” Social Problems 42 (1): 124–44. https://doi.org/10.2307/3097008.

  • Young, Iris Marion. 2003. “Responsibility and Structural Injustice.” The Lindley Lecture, The University of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK

    Rebecca MF Hewer

Authors
  1. Rebecca MF Hewer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rebecca MF Hewer .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hewer, R.M. (2021). Subjectivity, Responsibility, and Choice. In: Sex-Work, Prostitution and Policy. Palgrave Studies in Science, Knowledge and Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74954-5_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74954-5_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-74953-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-74954-5

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation