SpringerLink
Log in

The Relation Between Walking and Urban Form: Identifying Gaps in Egyptian Literature

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Towards Implementation of Sustainability Concepts in Develo** Countries

Part of the book series: Advances in Science, Technology & Innovation ((ASTI))

  • 783 Accesses

Abstract

Walkability is an indicator of how pleasant a walking area is. It has many benefits that include environmental, health, and economic, and it also affects the quality of life. According to international literature, walkability is mainly affected by two of variables; (a) human-related and (b) urban form-related. Human variables include behavior, age, physical activity, safety perception, socioeconomic level, and others, while urban form variables are related to transportation infrastructure, land-use mix, streets configuration/design, and urban density. Internationally, studies in this area focused on multidisciplinary research methods combining public health, transportation, social behavior, and urban form. However, not many studies have simultaneously linked urban form variables with human behavior-related variables in a quantitative manner. On the other hand, in the Egyptian literature, a clear consensus on the advantages of mixed-use and density can be noticed. Nonetheless, empirical evidence or quantified description for these terms is rarely provided. Furthermore, no significant attention is given to the impact of human-related variables on walking. Therefore, the main aim of this paper is to investigate the international and local methodologies that focused on walkability and its relation with social behavior and urban form. The study at hand classifies and categorizes the main streams of research internationally and locally. Consequently, define gaps in the Egyptian literature and identify possible topics that need to be quantitatively addressed in the local context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 139.09
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
EUR 181.89
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
EUR 181.89
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abedo, M., Salheen, M., & Elshater, A. (2019). How can urban fabrics enhance walkability? Comparative spatial analyses in Cairo. Architecture & Urbanism (pp. 34–43). Researchgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abley, S., & Turner, S. (2001). Predicting walkability (No. 452). Transport Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Hagla, K. (2009). Evaluating new urbanism’s walkability performance: a comprehensive approach to assessment in Saifi Village, Beirut, Lebanon. Urban Design International, 139–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ameli, S. H., Hamidi, S., Garfinkel-Castro, A., & Ewing, R. (2015). Do better urban design qualities lead to more walking in Salt Lake City, Utah? Journal of Urban Design, 20(3), 393–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aultman-Hall L., Roorda M., & Baetz, B. W. (1997). Using GIS for evaluation of neighborhood pedestrian accessibility. Urban Planning Development, 10–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, L. (2017). Exploring the relationship between walkability and the built environment: A case study of three intersections in Seattle’s University District. University of Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barros, A.P., Martínez, L.M. & Viegas, J.M. (2017). How urban form promotes walkability? In 20th EURO working group on transportation meeting (pp. 133–140). Transportation Research Procedia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Board, T. R. (2005). Transportation Research Board, Does the built environment influence physical activity? Examining the evidence. Transportation Research Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, K. M., Pinkston, M. M., & Poston, W. S. C. (2005). Obesity and the built environment. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 105(5), 110–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breheny, M. (1992). The contradictions of the compact city. Sustainable Development and Urban Form, 138–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, B. B., & Werner, C. M. (2009). Before and after a new light rail stop: Resident attitudes, travel behavior, and obesity. Journal of the American Planning Association, 75(1), 5–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, B. B., Yamada, I., Smith, K. R., Zick, C. D., Kowaleski-Jones, L., & Fan, J. X. (2009). Mixed land use and walkability: Variations in land use measures and relationships with BMI, overweight, and obesity. Health & Place, 15(4), 1130–1141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton, E. (2000). The compact city: Just or just compact? A preliminary analysis. Urban Studies, 1969–2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cao, X., Mokhtarian, P. L., & Handy, S. L. (2009). Examining the impacts of residential self-selection on travel behaviour: A focus on empirical findings. Transport Reviews, 29(3), 359–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, N., & Nelson, S. D. (1973). On being useful: The nature and consequences of psychological research on social problems. American Psychologist, 28(3), 199.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, E. (2012). Walkability as an urban design problem: Understanding the activity of walking in the urban environment. KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Architecture and the Built Environment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, D. A., McKenzie, T. L., Sehgal, A., Williamson, S., Golinelli, D., & Lurie, N. (2007). Contribution of public parks to physical activity. American Journal of Public Health, 97(3), 509–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Council, M. A. R. (1998). Creating walkable communities: A guide for local governments. Planning Commissioners Journal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewing, R., & Cervero, R. (2002). Travel and the built environment: A synthesis. Transportation Research Record, 1780(1), 87–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewing, R., & Handy, S. (2009). Measuring the unmeasurable: Urban design qualities related to walkability. Journal of Urban Design, 14(1), 65–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, A. (2015). What is a walkable place? The walkability debate in urban design. Urban Design International, 274–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, A. & Southworth, M. (2008). Cities afoot—Pedestrians, walkability and urban design. Journal of Urban Design, 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, A., Oakes, J. M., Lee, B., & Schmitz, K. H. (2009). The built environment, walking, and physical activity: Is the environment more important to some people than others? Transportation Research Part D, 42–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, L. D., Andresen, M. A., & Schmid, T. L. (2004). Obesity relationships with community design, physical activity, and time spent in cars. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 27(2), 87–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frumkin, H. (2002). Urban Sprawl and public health. Public Health Reports, 201–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghonimi, I. (2017). Towards sustainable new settlements in Egypt: Lessons learned from a comparison between traditional and modern settlements in Greater Cairo Region—Egypt. Journal of Sustainable Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golan, Y. (2017). Gendered walkability: Building a day time walkability index for women in San Fransisco. The Faculty of San Francisco State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gullón, P., Bilal, U., Cebrecos, A., Badland, H. M., Galán, I., & Franco, M. (2017). Intersection of neighborhood dynamics and socioeconomic status in small-area walkability: The Heart Healthy Hoods project. International Journal of Health Geographics, 16(1), 21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, G. (2014). Design for healthy communities: The potential of form-based codes to create walkable urban streets. Journal of Urban Design, 151–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahim, A., & Shaw, D. (2009). Egyptian compact-city veracity: The fallacy and credibility of mixed use and high density for a low carbon city. Compact-City Veracity. 45th ISOCARP Congress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahim, A., & Alattar, A. (2017). Street networks between traditional and new Egyptian developments, problems and learned lessons. Green urbanism (pp. 306–318). International conference: Procedia Environmental Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahim, A. (2011). Veracity of compact urban form for new Egyptian cities: Measuring urban and social sustainability of the low income neighbourhoods. University of Liverpool.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. (2001). Environmental impacts of urban sprawl: A survey of the literature and proposed research agenda. Environment and Planning, 717–735.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C., & MacDonald, C. (2004). Sustainable urban form and real estate markets. Herriot-Watt University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C., & Moudon, A. V. (2006). The 3Ds+ R: Quantifying land use and urban form correlates of walking. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 11(3), 204–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leslie, E., Coffee, N., Frank, L., Owen, N., Bauman, A., & Hugo, G. (2007). Walkability of local communities: Using geographic information systems to objectively assess relevant environmental attributes. Health & Place, 13(1), 111–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maria Kockelman, K. (1997). Travel behavior as function of accessibility, land use mixing, and land use balance: Evidence from San Francisco Bay Area. Transportation Research Record, 1607(1), 116–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, P. W. G., & Kenworthy, J. R. (1989). Gasoline consumption and cities: A comparison of US cities with a global survey. Journal of the American Planning Association, 55(1), 24–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen, N., Cerin, E., Leslie, E., Coffee, N., Frank, L. D., Bauman, A. E., & Sallis, J. F. (2007). Neighborhood walkability and the walking behavior of Australian adults. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 33(5), 387–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen, N., Humpel, N., Leslie, E., Bauman, A., & Sallis, J. F. (2004). Understanding environmental influences on walking: Review and research agenda. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 27(1), 67–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pucher, J., & Renne, J. (2003). Socioeconomics of urban travel: Evidence from the 2001 NHTS. Transportation Quarterly, 57(3), 49–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rafaat, M. H., & Kafafy, N. A. (2014). Approaches and Lessons for enhancing walkability in cities. International Journal of Education and Research, 2, 301–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saelens, B. E., Sallis, J. F., & Frank, L. D. (2003). Environmental correlates of walking and cycling: Findings from the transportation, urban design, and planning literatures. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 25(2), 80–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tawfik, M. (2017). Using Urban Design Qualities for Building a New Composite Walkability Index for Cairo Streets. International Design Journal, 7(4), 255–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dyck, D., Deforche, B., Cardon, G., & De Bourdeaudhuij, I. (2009). Neighbourhood walkability and its particular importance for adults with a preference for passive transport. Health & Place, 15(2), 496–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villanueva, K., Knuiman, M., Nathan, A., Giles-Corti, B., Christian, H., Foster, S., & Bull, F. (2014). The impact of neighborhood walkability on walking: Does it differ across adult life stage and does neighborhood buffer size matter? Health & Place, 25, 43–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wener, R. E., & Evans, G. W. (2007). A morning stroll: Levels of physical activity in car and mass transit commuting. Environment and Behavior, 39(1), 62–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Arab Academy for Science, Technology and Maritime Transport, Cairo, Egypt

    Farah A. Sami & Omar M. Galal

Authors
  1. Farah A. Sami
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Omar M. Galal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil and Architectural Engineering, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman

    Chaham Alalouch

  2. Department of Engineering, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy

    Cristina Piselli

  3. Luiss Guido Carli University, Rome, Italy

    Francesco Cappa

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sami, F.A., Galal, O.M. (2021). The Relation Between Walking and Urban Form: Identifying Gaps in Egyptian Literature. In: Alalouch, C., Piselli, C., Cappa, F. (eds) Towards Implementation of Sustainability Concepts in Develo** Countries. Advances in Science, Technology & Innovation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74349-9_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation