Epilogue: The Poet as Scientist; The Scientist as Poet

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Biosemiotic Literary Criticism

Part of the book series: Biosemiotics ((BSEM,volume 24))

  • 173 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter, I offer eight biosemiotic concepts or principles and then eight corresponding sets of writing prompts, the idea being to help readers explore the biosemiotic connections between nature and culture, semiosis and writing, and science and literature. As Kalevi Kull has written, biosemiotics is “all about” “finding the poetic or poetic-like processes in living systems” (Biosemiotics 10:17, 2017); therefore, good biosemioticians understand the artfulness of nature itself; and good poets and practitioners of biosemiotic criticism understand the need for powerful modes of scientific analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
GBP 19.95
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
GBP 87.50
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
GBP 109.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
GBP 109.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anttila, R. (1992). Change and metatheory at the beginning of the 1990s; the primacy of history. In C. Jones (Ed.), Historical linguistics: Problems and perspectives (pp. 43–73). Whiteplains: Longman Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coletta, W. J. (2014). A Peircean semiotic model for describing the anti-oedipal structure of “humanimal” selves. In K. Tüür & M. Tønnessen (Eds.), The semiotics of animal representations (pp. 313–341). Amsterdam/New York: Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coletta, W. J. (2015). Semiotic modeling: A pragmaticist’s guide. In P. Trifonas (Ed.), The international handbook of semiotics (Vol. 1, pp. 951–980). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Eisley, L. (1969). The star thrower. In The unexpected universe. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frost, R. (1979). The poetry of Robert Frost: The collected poems, complete and unabridged (E. C. Lathem, Ed.). New York: Henry Holt and Co. (“All Revelation” originally published in A Witness Tree [1942]).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162, 1243–1248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time (J. Macquarrie & E. Robinson, Trans.). New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmeyer, J. (1996 [1993]). Signs of meaning in the universe (B. J. Haveland, Trans., Advances in semiotics). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramnick, J. (2011). Against literary Darwinism. Critical Inquiry, 37(Winter), 315–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kull, K. (2017). Biosemiotics and humanities: A manifesto, in how can the study of the humanities inform the study of biosemiotics? Favareau et al. Biosemiotics, 10, 9–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, R. C. (1993 [1991]). Science as social action. In Biology as ideology: The doctrine of DNA (pp. 105–123). New York: Harper Perennial.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, J.-F. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge (G. Bennington & B. Massumi, Trans.). Minneapolis: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margulis (Sagan), L. (1967). On the origin of mitosing cells. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 14(3), 225–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margulis, L. (1992 [1981]). Symbiosis in cell evolution. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meeker, J. W. (1974 [1972]). The comedy of survival: Studies in literary ecology. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, D. (2012). For the love of lakes. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolson, M. (1990). Alexander von Humboldt and the geography of vegetation. In A. Cunningham & N. Jardine (Eds.), Romanticism and the sciences. Cambridge: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, M. (1983). American primitive. New York: Back Bay Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roethke, T. (1975). The collected poems of Theodore Roethke. Garden City: Anchor Press/Doubleday and Co. [“The Shape of Fire” was published in The Lost Son and Other Poems in 1948 and “Unfold! Unfold!” in Praise to the End in 1951.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Rupke, N. A. (2018). In J. A. Palmer & D. E. Cooper (Eds.), Alexander von Humboldt. Fifty key thinkers on the environment. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shubin, N. (2009). Your inner fish. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Uexküll, J. (1982). The theory of meaning. Semiotica, 42(1), 25–82.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Coletta, W.J. (2021). Epilogue: The Poet as Scientist; The Scientist as Poet. In: Biosemiotic Literary Criticism. Biosemiotics, vol 24. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72495-5_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation