Abstract
In this chapter, we address the problem of humanizing business when we must interact with intelligent robots and other AI systems, rather than real people, on a daily basis. There is a strong tendency to anthropomorphize pets and other animals that carries over to smart machines, leading us to replace human relationships with something less sophisticated and subtle. As a result, we argue, humanizing machines actually tends to dehumanize the workplace. We take an anthropological approach to this phenomenon that teaches three important lessons. One is that Western cultures have a particularly strong tendency to anthropomorphize machines, due to what Max Weber called the disenchantment of nature. Another is that humans have long interacted with intelligent nonhuman beings, such as domesticated work animals, without anthropomorphizing them. Finally, we can take a cue from these interactions to create analogous relationships with robots by neither humanizing nor objectifying them, but by relating to them in a manner that suits their capabilities. In particular, we can avoid anthropomorphism by involving workers in the training of AI systems, much as our ancestors trained domesticated animals, and by introducing ritual activities involving robots that clarify their ethical status and guide our interaction with them.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alpeyev, Pavel. 2018. The new Japanese robot is designed to hack your emotion, Bloomberg, 18 December.
Buss, Sarah. 1999. Appearing respectful: The moral significance of manners. Ethics 109 (4): 795–826.
Carpenter, Julie. 2016. Culture and Human-Robot Interaction in Militarized Spaces: A War Story. Ashgate.
Christakis, Nicholas A. 2019. How AI will rewire us, Atlantic, April 2019.
Cornish, Dean. 2018. Love, intimacy and companionship: A tale of robots in Japan, Dateline, 21 June 2018.
Diamond, Cora. 1978. Eating meat and eating people. Philosophy 53 (206): 465–479.
Dutton, Jane E. 2003. Energize Your Workplace: How to Create and Sustain High-Quality Connections at Work. Jossey-Bass.
Garber, Megan. 2013. Funerals for fallen robots, Atlantic, 20 September.
Gladden, M. E. 2019. Who will be the members of Society 5.0? Toward an anthropology of technologically posthumanized future societies, Social Sciences, 8, published online May.
Görür, Ö., B. Rosman, G. Hoffman, and S. Albayrak. 2017. Toward integrating theory of mind into adaptive decision-making of social robots to understand human intention, ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) Workshop on the Role of Intentions in HRI, Vienna, Austria, March.
Gorvett, Zaria. 2018. How humans bond with robot colleagues, BBC Worklife, 30 May.
Hart, Lynette. 2005. The elephant-mahout relationship in India and Nepal: A tourist attraction. In Animals in Person: Cultural Perspectives on Human-Animal Intimacies, ed. John Knight, 163–189. Oxford: Berg.
Hofstede, Geert. 1983. Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Administrative Science Quarterly 28 (4): 625–629.
———. 2010. Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. McGraw-Hill.
Hooker, John. 2003. Working Across Cultures. Stanford University Press.
Hooker, John, and Tae Wan Kim. 2018. Toward non-intuition-based machine and artificial intelligence ethics: A deontological approach based on modal logic. In Proceedings of the 2018 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society. ACM.
———. 2019. Truly Autonomous Machines are Ethical. Artificial Intelligence Magazine, Winter.
House, Robert J., Paul J. Hanges, Mansour Javidan, Peter W. Dorfman, and Vipin Gupta, eds. 2004. Culture, Leadership and Organizations: The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies. SAGE Publications.
Japan Times. 2018. Love in another dimension: Japanese man “marries” Hatsune Miku hologram, 12 November.
Kahney, Leander. 2003. The new pet craze: Robovacs, Wired, 16 June.
Kato, Takahiro A., Shigenobu Kanba, and Alan R. Teo. 2018. Hikikomori: Experience in Japan and international relevance. World Psychiatry 17 (1): 105–106.
Kunthara, S. 2018. California law takes aim at chatbots posing as humans, San Francisco Chronicle, 13 October.
Kwon, M., M.F. Jung, and R.A. Knepper. 2016. Human expectations of social robots. In 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). Christchurch: IEEE.
Lah, Kyung. 2009. Tokyo man marries video game character, CNN, 17 December.
Lin, Patrick. 2016. Relationships with robots: Good or bad for humans? Forbes, 1 February.
Pfeffer, Jeffrey. 2006. Working alone: Whatever happened to the idea of organizations as communities? In America at Work, ed. E.E. Lawler and J. O’Toole, 3–21. Palgrave Macmillan.
Riordan, Christine M., and Rodger W. Griffeth. 1995. The opportunity for friendship in the workplace: An underexplored construct. Journal of Business and Psychology 10 (2): 141–154.
Sanbot. 2019. Industrial. http://en.sanbot.com/industrial/. Accessed 15 September 2019.
Satariano, Adam, Elian Peltier, and Dmitry Kostyukov. 2018. Meet Zora, the robot caregiver, New York Times, 23 November.
Schaerer, Enrique, Richard Kelley, and Monica Nicolescu. 2009. Robots as animals: A framework for liability and responsibility in human-robot interactions. In RO-MAN 2009-The 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication. IEEE.
Searle, John. 1984. Minds, Brains, and Science. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Singer, Peter. 1995. Animal Liberation. Random House.
Soul Machines. 2019. Solutions. https://www.soulmachines.com/solutions/. Accessed 15 Sept.
Szegedy, Christian, Wojciech Zaremba, Ilya Sutskever, Joan Bruna, Dumitru Erhan, Ian Goodfellow, and Rob Fergus. 2014. Intriguing properties of neural networks, ar**v 1312.6199, 19 February.
Taggart, Will, Sherry Turkle, and Cory D. Kidd. 2005. An interactive robot in a nursing home: Preliminary remarks, Cognitive Science Society Conference, Android Science Workshop, 21–23 July, pp. 56–61.
Thiboudeaux, Wanda. 2018. Personal chatbots are about to take over. Here’s what to expect, Inc., 20 December.
Tomasello, Michael, Malinda Carpenter, Josep Call, Tanya Behne, and Henrike Moll. 2005. Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (5): 675–691.
Trice Harrison, M., and Janice M. Beyer. 1984. Studying organizational cultures through rites and ceremonials. Academy of Management Review 9 (4): 653–669.
———. 1991. Cultural leadership in organizations. Organization Science 2 (2): 149–169.
Vitelli, Romeo. 2013. Can robots help care for the elderly? Psychology Today, 17 June.
Weber, Max. 1919. Science as a vocation, originally published as Wissenschaft als Beruf by Duncker and Humboldt, Munich, from a speech given at Munich University. Translated by H. H. Gerth and C. Wright Mills in From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, Oxford University Press, 1946, pp. 129–156.
Yo, Sangseok, and Lionel P. Robert. 2018. Emotional attachment, performance, and viability in teams collaborating with embodied physical action (EPA) robots. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 19 (5): 2.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hooker, J., Kim, T.W. (2022). Humanizing Business in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. In: Dion, M., Freeman, R.E., Dmytriyev, S.D. (eds) Humanizing Business. Issues in Business Ethics, vol 53. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72204-3_40
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72204-3_40
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-72203-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-72204-3
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)