Abstract
The positive rates of post-accession compliance with EU legislation exhibited by the member states of the 2004 and 2007 accession waves raise the question of the factors that have influenced this unexpected relatively positive record compared to the old member states. In this context, this chapter aims to examine Romania’s post-accession compliance behavior in environmental policy. It addresses the factors that have shaped Romania’s post-accession compliance with environmental legislation as it has benefited from long-term transitional arrangements. I argue that conditionality has played a significant role in the successful closing of the accession negotiations, notably chapter 22 Environment, having in mind that Romania managed to align its legislation following the European rules but needed extended deadlines for problematic areas of the environment, where adjustment pressures were high due to financial and administrative costs. In the post-accession stage, the European Commission’s monitoring and sanctioning mechanisms through the infringement procedures have been a defining variable in explaining Romania’s good transposition record. Thus, this study seeks to contribute to the implementation literature focused on the critical case of Romania. It aims to shed light on the new member states’ implementation behavior by evaluating Romania’s performance in the area of environment, more than 10 years after the accession to the EU.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
The case envisaged the dust pollution in the city of Moldova Nouă (western Romania) through the Boșneag decantation pond, which belonged to Moldomin, a state mining company. The infringement procedure reached the final stage, and Romania was referred to the Court of Justice due to noncompliance by wrongful application with Directive 2006/21/CE on waste management from extractive industries.
References
Angelova, M., T. Dannwolf, and T. König. 2012. How Robust Are Compliance Findings? A Research Synthesis. Journal of European Public Policy 19: 1269–1291. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2012.705051.
Baun, M., and D. Marek. 2013. The Implementation of EU Environmental Policy in the Czech Republic: Problems with Post-Accession Compliance? Europe-Asia Studies 65: 1877–1897. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2013.848639.
Checkel, J.T. 2001. Why Comply? Social Learning and European Identity Change. International Organization 55: 553–588. https://doi.org/10.1162/00208180152507551.
Dąbrowski, M. 2012. Shallow or Deep Europeanisation? The Uneven Impact of EU Cohesion Policy on the Regional and Local Authorities in Poland. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 30: 730–745. https://doi.org/10.1068/c1164r.
Dimitrova, A. 2002. Enlargement, Institution-Building and the EU’s Administrative Capacity Requirement. West European Politics 25: 171–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/713601647.
Dimitrova, A., and A. Buzogány. 2014. Post-Accession Policy-Making in Bulgaria and Romania: Can Non-state Actors Use EU Rules to Promote Better Governance?: Post-accession policy-making in Bulgaria and Romania. JCMS. Journal of Common Market Studies 52: 139–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12084.
European Commission. 2017. COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT. The EU Environmental Implementation Review Country Report – ROMANIA.
———. 2008. Commission report on monitoring the application of EU law. Eur. Comm. – Eur. Comm. https://ec.europa.eu/info/publications/2008-commission-report-monitoring-application-eu-law_en. Accessed 25 Oct 2020.
European Commisssion. 2004. 2004 Regular Report on Romania’s progress towards accession.
European Parliament. 2006. REPORT on the accession of Romania to the European Union – A6–0421/2006. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&reference=A6-2006-0421&language=EN. Accessed 2 Nov 2020.
Falkner, G., M. Hartlapp, S. Leiber, and O. Treib. 2004. Non-Compliance with EU Directives in the Member States: Opposition through the Backdoor? West European Politics 27: 452–473. https://doi.org/10.1080/0140238042000228095.
Falkner, G., and O. Treib. 2008. Three Worlds of Compliance or Four? The EU-15 Compared to New Member States. JCMS J Common Mark Stud 46: 293–313. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2007.00777.x.
Gallagher, T. 2009. Romania and the European Union: How the Weak Vanquished the Strong. In Manchester University Press. New York: Manchester.
Grabbe, H. 2014. Six Lessons of Enlargement Ten Years On: The EU’s Transformative Power in Retrospect and Prospect: Six lessons of enlargement ten years on. JCMS. Journal of Common Market Studies 52: 40–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12174.
Orru, K., and H. Rothstein. 2015. Not ‘Dead Letters’, Just ‘Blind Eyes’: The Europeanisation of Drinking Water Risk Regulation in Estonia and Lithuania. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 47: 356–372. https://doi.org/10.1068/a130295p.
Richardson, J., ed. 2012. Constructing a Policy-Making State?: Policy Dynamics in the EU. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
Romania Curata J 8 aprilie 2019. 2019. Poluarea de la Moldova Nouă oferă „spectacol” în Serbia (video). In: Rom. Curată. http://www.romaniacurata.ro/poluarea-de-la-moldova-noua-ofera-spectacol-in-serbia-video/. Accessed 4 May 2019.
Sedelmeier, U. 2016 Compliance after conditionality: Why are the European Union’s new member states so good?. http://userpage.fu-berlin.de/kfgeu/maxcap/. Accessed 25 Oct 2020.
———. 2014. Anchoring Democracy from Above? The European Union and Democratic Backsliding in Hungary and Romania after Accession. JCMS. Journal of Common Market Studies 52: 105–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12082.
Selin, H, and SD. Van Deveer. 2015. EU Environmental Policy Making and Implementation: Changing Processes and Mixed Outcomes.
Special Eurobarometer 295. 2008. Attitudes of European citizens towards the environment.
Special Eurobarometer 365. 2011. Attitudes of European citizens towards the environment.
Spendzharova, A., and E. Versluis. 2013. Issue salience in the European policy process: what impact on transposition? Journal of European Public Policy 20: 1499–1516. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2013.781802.
Toshkov, D. 2011. The quest for relevance: Research on compliance with EU law. 23.
———. 2008. Embracing European Law: Compliance with EU Directives in Central and Eastern Europe. European Union Politics 9: 379–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116508093490.
Trauner, F. 2009. Post-accession compliance with EU law in Bulgaria and Romania: A comparative perspective. European Integration Online Papers. https://doi.org/10.1695/2009021.
World Bank. 2011. World Bank, Solid Waste Management in Bulgaria, Croatia, Poland, and Romania: A Cross-Country Analysis of Sector Challenges Towards EU Harmonization, 2011. World Bank.
Zeff, E., and E.B. Pirro. 2015. The European Union and the Member States. 3rd ed. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cugleșan, N. (2021). Romania and Post-accession Compliance with EU Environmental Policy. In: Todor, A., Helepciuc, F.E. (eds) Europeanization of Environmental Policies and their Limitations . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68586-7_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68586-7_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-68585-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-68586-7
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)