Abstract
Agenda 2030 and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are the global development reference to tackle the most pressing issues in contemporary societies. However, the limited progress made toward them motivates discussions about the best means to produce effective change in the next decade. In this context, localization is promoted as a privileged means to achieve further progress. Discussions of localization relate to the need to improve policy delivery by placing decision-making closer to those able to produce context-sensitive interventions. These discussions build on assumptions that relate to predating debates on decentralization. Based on a review of the literature on the recent experience of South American countries, this chapter argues that framing the discussion on localization considering the lessons from decades of decentralization could aid the implementation of Agenda 2030 and the SDGs. Moving forward, the critical role of building effective intergovernmental relations must be placed at the center of this debate.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Afonso, J. R. R. (2004). Las relaciones intergubernamentales dentro de Brasil. Revista de La CEPAL, 84, 135–157.
Agranoff, R. (1993). Las relaciones intergubernamentales y el Estado de las Autonomías. Política y Sociedad, 87–105.
Agranoff, R. (2006). Inside collaborative networks: Ten lessons for public managers. Public Administration Review, 66(s1), 56–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00666.x
Arandia, I. C. (2002). Descentralización y relaciones Intergubernamentales en Bolivia. Reflexión Política, 19–45.
Arias, K., Ramos, C., & Retamal, K. (2017). Abriendo la caja negra de las asociaciones municipales. Análisis del funcionamiento de la cooperación inter-municipal en Chile. Revista Políticas Públicas, 10(2).
Arsel, M., Hogenboom, B., & Pellegrini, L. (2016). The extractive imperative and the boom in environmental conflicts at the end of the progressive cycle in Latin America. The Extractive Industries and Society, 887–889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2016.10.013
Avritzer, L. (2002). Democracy and the Public Space in Latin America, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Balkundi, P., & Kilduff, M. (2006). The ties that lead: A social network approach to leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(4), 419–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.01.001
BID. (2020). ALC Post COVID-19 Retos y Oportunidades (pp. 1–65). https://publications.iadb.org/publications/spanish/document/ALC-Post-COVID-19-Retos-y-oportunidades-para-CAN.pdf
Bodin, Ö., Sandström, A., & Crona, B. (2016). Collaborative networks for effective ecosystem-based management: A set of working hypotheses. Policy Studies Journal, 1–26.
Borges, F. A. (2018). Neoliberalism with a human face? Ideology and the diffusion of Latin America’s conditional cash transfers. Comparative Politics, 50(2), 147–169.
Botero, S. L. (2011). Hacia un nuevo debate sobre la descentralización en Colombia: el análisis intergubernamental desde una lectura institucional. Revista CS, 8, 211–243. https://doi.org/10.18046/recs.i8.1134
Bouckaert, G., Peters, B. G., & Verhoest, K. (2010). The coordination of public sector organizations. Palgrave Macmillan.
Boxenbaum, E., & Jonsson, E. (2017). Isomorphism, diffusion, and decoupling: Concept evolution and theoretical challenges. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, T. B. Lawrence, & R. E. Meyer (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (2nd ed., pp. 77–101). SAGE.
Bustos Gallardo, B., Lukas, M., Stamm, C., & Torre, A. (2019). Neoliberalismo y gobernanza territorial: propuestas y reflexiones a partir del caso de Chile. Revista de Geografía Norte Grande, 73, 161–183.
CEPAL. (2015). Memoria del primer Encuentro de Expertos Gubernamentales en Políticas de Desarrollo Territorial en América Latina y el Caribe. CEPAL.
CEPAL. (2022). Una década de acción para un cambio de época. CEPAL.
CEPAL, & Unidas, N. (2020). Informe Especial COVID-19 No 1. América Latina y el Caribe ante la pandemia del COVID-19. Efectos económicos y sociales, 1–15.
Chalmers, D. A., Carlos, M. V., Katherine, H., Scott, B. M., Kerianne, P., & Monique, S. (1999). The New Politics of Inequality in Latin America Rethinking Participation and Representation, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Cingolani, M. S. (2005). Relaciones intergubernamentales y descentralización: el papel de los mecanismos formales y fiscales de coordinación en la institucionalización de procesos desdentralizadores.
Cisneros, P. (2019). What makes collaborative water governance partnerships resilient to policy change? A comparative study of two cases in Ecuador. Ecology and Society, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.5751/es-10667-240129
Cisneros, P., Cabrera-Barona, P., & López, V. (2020). Civil society and the 2030 Agenda. An assessment of the implementation of SDG-actions in the Metropolitan District of Quito. Revista Iberoamericana de Estudios de Desarrollo = Iberoamerican. Journal of Development Studies, 9(1), 100–119. https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_ried/ijds.431
Cisneros, P., Christel, L. G., Novas, M. A., & Parrado, C., (2022). Las altas cortes y el cambio en las agendas intersectoriales en temas socioambientales en Argentina y Colombia. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Clark, T. (2003). Canadian mining companies in Latin America: Community rights and corporate responsibility (pp. 1–43).
Considine, M., Lewis, J. M., & Alexander, D. (2009). Networks, innovation and public policy: Politicians, bureaucrats and the pathways to change inside government. Palgrave Macmillan.
Cortés, O. L. Z. (2013). El estudio de las relaciones entre niveles de gobierno desde las relaciones intergubernamentales y la gobernanza multinivel. Estudios de Derecho, 70(156).
Cravacuore, D. & Clemente, A. (2006). El proceso reciente de asociativismo intermunicipal en Argentina.
de Mattos, C. A. (2010). Globalización y metamorfosis metropolitana en América Latina. De la ciudad a lo urbano generalizado. Revista de Geografía Norte Grande, 81–104.
Díaz, H. (2006). Relaciones intergubernamentales. Espacios Públicos, 9(18), 36–53.
Diáz de Landa, M. (2007). Las relaciones intergubernamentales desde los gobiernos locales. In C. D. & I. R. (Ed.), Procesos políticos municipales comparados en Argentina y Chile (1990–2005) (pp. 229–270). Editorial Universidad Nacional de Quilmes.
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.
Falleti, T. G. (2005). A sequential theory of decentralization: Latin American cases in comparative perspective. American Political Science Review, 99(3), 327–346.
Falleti, T. G. (2010). Decentralization and subnational politics in Latin America. Cambridge University Press.
Faust, J., Arneth, F., von der Goltz, N., Harbers, I., Illerhues, J., & Scholms, M. (2008). Political fragmentation, Decentralization, and development cooperation. German Development Institute.
Fiszbein, A. (1997). The emergence of local capacity: Lessons from Colombia. World Development, 25(7), 1029–1043.
Flores, A. V., & Cenecorta, A. I. (2015). Gobernanza metropolitana como estrategia para planificar y gestionar el desarrollo de la Zona Metropolitana del Valle de Toluca. Revista de Estudios Regionales, 102(enero-abril), 91–118.
Folke, C., Pritchard, L., Berkes, F., & Colding, J. (2007). The problem of fit between ecosystems and institutions: Ten years later. Ecology and Society.
Freigedo, M., Milanesi, A., & Ferreira, C. (2020). RIA: aplicación de una metodología para el seguimiento de la localización de los ODS. Cuadernos Del CLAEH, 112, 119–132. https://doi.org/10.29192/claeh.39.2.8
Gnangnon, S. K., & Brun, J. F. (2018). Impact of multilateral trade liberalization on resource revenue. Economies, 6(4), 60.
Goldfrank, B. (2006). Los procesos de “presupuesto participativo” en América latina: éxito, fracaso y cambio. Revista de ciencia política (Santiago), 26(2), 3–28. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-090X2006000200001
Gómez, E. J. (2014). What reverses decentralization? Failed policy implementation, civic supporters, or central bureaucrats’ expertise? The case of Brazil’s AIDS Program. Administration & Society, 46(8), 929–959. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399712469199
Gómez, M. V. T., & Calderón, A. V. M. (2007). Programa para el mejoramiento de la calidad del aire en el Área Metropolitana del Valle de AburrÁ Contrato 158 de 2005. Producción Limpia, 1–16.
Grindle, M. S. (2000). Audacious reforms. John Hopkins University Press.
Grindle, M. S. (2009). Going local (3rd ed.). Princeton University Press.
Habermas, J. (1992). Legitimation crisis (T. McCarthy, Trans.). Polity Press.
Haslam, P. A. (2007). The firm rules: Multinational corporations, policy space, and neoliberalism. Third World Quarterly, 28(6), 1167–1183. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436590701507594
Helmke, G. R. F. J. (2011). Courts in Latin America. Cambridge University Press.
Imperial, M. T. (2005). Using collaboration as a governance strategy lessons from six watershed management programs. Administration & Society, 37(3), 281–320. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399705276111
Institute for Human Rights and Business. (2012). State of play: The corporate responsibility to respect human rights in business relationships (pp. 1–180) http://www.ihrb.org/pdf/state-of-play/State-of-Play-Full-Report.pdf
Irawati, B., & Srinivas, H. (2018). Localization of the SDGs: Role of local governments. The Bulletin of Yokohama City University Social Science., 70(2), 335–351.
Jiménez, J. P., & Ter-Minassian, T. (2016). Política fiscal y el ciclo en América Latina. El rol de los gobiernos subnacionales (Serie Macroeconomía Del Desarrollo) (pp. 1–43). CEPAL.
Klijn, E.-H., & Koppenjan, J. (2015). Governance networks in the public sector. Routledge.
Knoepfel, P. (2018). Public policy resources. Policy Press.
Koliba, C., Meek, J. W., & Zia, A. (2010). Governance networks in public administration and public policy. CRC Press.
Kooiman, J. (1994). In J. Kooiman (Ed.), Modern governance. SAGE.
Kooiman, J. (2003). Governing as governance. SAGE.
Kramarz, T., Cosolo, D., & Rossi, A. (2016). Judicialization of environmental policy and the crisis of democratic accountability. Review of Policy Research, 34(1), 31–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12218
Lanfranchi, G., & Bidart, M. (2016). Gobernanza metropolitana en América Latina y el Caribe (pp. 1–222).
Larson, A. (2006). Políticas forestales nacionales y locales.
Lubell, M. (2004). Collaborative watershed management: A view from the grassroots. Policy Studies Journal, 32(3), 341–361. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2004.00069.x
Mancini, A. A. Á., & Pérez, B. M. E. F. (2006). El asociacionismo municipal en Argentina. Su aplicación para promover el desarrollo local y regional en Mendoza., Provincia, 11–32.
Massiris, Á. (2015). Gestión territorial y desarrollo – Hacia una política de desarrollo territorial sostenible en América Latina. Editorial UPTC.
Medina, T. O. (2019a). El Rol Estratégico De Los Gobiernos Locales y Regionales En La Implementación De La Agenda 2030: Experiencias Desde La Cooperación Sur-Sur y Triangular. OASIS, 31, 9–29. https://doi.org/10.18601/16577558.n31.03
Medina, T. O. (2019b). Localization of the Sustainable Development Goals in border areas and cross-border South-South cooperation in Latin America. Aldea Mundo, 24(47), 27–38.
Méndez, J. L. (1997). The Latin American administrative tradition. International Encyclopaedia of Public Policy and Administration.
Méndez, J. L. (2020). Políticas públicas. Enfoque estratégico para América Latina. Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Morales, D. (2020). Conceptualizing sub-national regional cooperation. Regions and Cohesion, 10(1), 61–87. https://doi.org/10.3167/reco.2020.100105
Morata, F. (1990). Políticas públicas y relaciones intergubernamentales. Documentación Administrativa, 0(224–225). https://doi.org/10.24965/da.v0i224-225.5210
O’Donell, G. A. (1994). Delegative democracy. Journal of Democracy, 5(1), 55–69. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.1994.0010
Peruzzotti, E. (2012). Broadening the notion of democratic accountability: Participatory innovation in Latin America. Polity, 44(4), 625–642. https://doi.org/10.1057/pol.2012.20
Peruzzotti, E., & Smulovitz, C. (2002). Accountability social: la otra cara del control. In E. Peruzzotti (Ed.), Controlando la Política. Ciudadanos y Medios en las Nuevas Democracias Latinoamericanas (pp. 23–58). Editorial Temas.
Peters, B. G. (2018). The challenge of policy coordination. Policy Design and Practice, 1(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2018.1437946
Pianovi, M. R. (2008). Microregión misiones: Gestión asociada intermunicipal como estrategia de desarrollo local. 1–13.
Proaño, J., Guillén, D., Deza, L. G., Guillén, P., Norabuena, R., & Sánchez, S. (2020). Factores predominantes de la participación ciudadana en el proceso de presupuesto participativo. Revista Inclusiones, 18–39.
Quintero, R. (2006). Asociativismo Municipal en América Latina. Abya-Yala/FLACMA-DFID/GTZ.
Sabatier, P. A. (1988). An advocacy coalition framework the policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein. Policy Sciences, 21(2–3), 129–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00136406
Sánchez, F., & Montero, M. G. (Eds.). (2019). Los ciclos políticos y económicos de América Latina y el boom de las materias primas. Tecnos.
Selee, A. (2004). Exploring the link between decentralization and democratic governance. Decentralization and democratic governance in Latin America, 3–36. Tulchin, J. S., & Selee, A. D. (Eds.). Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, Latin American Program.
Sieder, R., Schjolden, L., & Angell, A. (Eds.). (2005). The judicialization of politics in Latin America. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-10887-6
Slack, L. (2014). The post-2015 global agenda – A role for local government. Commonwealth Journal of Local Governance., 15, 173–177.
Spink, P. (2005). The inter-municipal consortia in Brazil: An institutional introduction.
Stein, E., Tommasi, M., Echebarría, K., Lora, E., & Payne, M. (2006). La política de las políticas públicas. Progreso económico y social en América Latina, David Rockefeller Center for Latin American Studies.
Steinberg, P. F. (2012). Welcome to the jungle: Policy theory and political instability. In P. F. Steinberg & S. D. VanDeveer (Eds.), (pp. 255–312). MIT Press.
Stuhldreher, A. M. (2020). Avanços e desafios do desenvolvimento sustentável no Uruguai y suas implicações territoriais: Um olhar a localização dos ODS em Tacuarembó. Redes (St. Cruz Online), 25(4), 1652–1675. https://doi.org/10.17058/redes.v25i4.14555
Swyngedouw, E. (1997). Neither local nor global: ‘glocalization’ and the politics of scale. In K. Cox (Ed.), Spaces of globalization: Reasserting the power of the local. Guilford Press.
Teles, F. (2016). Local governance and inter-municipal cooperation. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137445742
Tjandradewi, B. I., & Srinivas, H. (2019). Localization of SDGs: Role of local governments. The Bulletin of Yokohama City University Social Science, 70(2), 335–351. https://doi.org/10.15015/00001671
Tomàs, M. (2018). Modelos de gobernanza metropolitana.
Tosun, J., & Lang, A. (2017). Policy integration: Map** the different concepts. Policy Studies, 38(6), 533–570. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2017.1339239
Trein, P., Biesbroek, R., Bolognesi, T., Cejudo, G. M., Duffy, R., Hustedt, T., & Meyer, I. (2020). Policy coordination and integration: A research agenda. Public Administration Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13180
United Nations. (2019). World population prospects 2019.
United Nations Division of Economic and Social Affairs, S., Min, Y., & Perucci, F. (2020). Impact of COVID-19 on SDG Progress (United Nations). https://www.un-ilibrary.org/content/papers/27081990/24
Young, O. R. (2003). Environmental governance: The role of institutions in causing and confronting environmental problems. International Environmental Agreements, 3, 377–393.
Zapata, J. A. (2007). Descentralización en Bolivia (Notas de Referencia). BID.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Cisneros, P. (2022). Intergovernmental Relations and the Effective Implementation of Agenda 2030 in South America. In: The Palgrave Handbook of Global Social Problems. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68127-2_17-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68127-2_17-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-68127-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-68127-2
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Social SciencesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences