Intergovernmental Relations and the Effective Implementation of Agenda 2030 in South America

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Global Social Problems

Abstract

Agenda 2030 and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are the global development reference to tackle the most pressing issues in contemporary societies. However, the limited progress made toward them motivates discussions about the best means to produce effective change in the next decade. In this context, localization is promoted as a privileged means to achieve further progress. Discussions of localization relate to the need to improve policy delivery by placing decision-making closer to those able to produce context-sensitive interventions. These discussions build on assumptions that relate to predating debates on decentralization. Based on a review of the literature on the recent experience of South American countries, this chapter argues that framing the discussion on localization considering the lessons from decades of decentralization could aid the implementation of Agenda 2030 and the SDGs. Moving forward, the critical role of building effective intergovernmental relations must be placed at the center of this debate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Afonso, J. R. R. (2004). Las relaciones intergubernamentales dentro de Brasil. Revista de La CEPAL, 84, 135–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agranoff, R. (1993). Las relaciones intergubernamentales y el Estado de las Autonomías. Política y Sociedad, 87–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agranoff, R. (2006). Inside collaborative networks: Ten lessons for public managers. Public Administration Review, 66(s1), 56–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00666.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arandia, I. C. (2002). Descentralización y relaciones Intergubernamentales en Bolivia. Reflexión Política, 19–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arias, K., Ramos, C., & Retamal, K. (2017). Abriendo la caja negra de las asociaciones municipales. Análisis del funcionamiento de la cooperación inter-municipal en Chile. Revista Políticas Públicas, 10(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Arsel, M., Hogenboom, B., & Pellegrini, L. (2016). The extractive imperative and the boom in environmental conflicts at the end of the progressive cycle in Latin America. The Extractive Industries and Society, 887–889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2016.10.013

  • Avritzer, L. (2002). Democracy and the Public Space in Latin America, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balkundi, P., & Kilduff, M. (2006). The ties that lead: A social network approach to leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(4), 419–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.01.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BID. (2020). ALC Post COVID-19 Retos y Oportunidades (pp. 1–65). https://publications.iadb.org/publications/spanish/document/ALC-Post-COVID-19-Retos-y-oportunidades-para-CAN.pdf

  • Bodin, Ö., Sandström, A., & Crona, B. (2016). Collaborative networks for effective ecosystem-based management: A set of working hypotheses. Policy Studies Journal, 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borges, F. A. (2018). Neoliberalism with a human face? Ideology and the diffusion of Latin America’s conditional cash transfers. Comparative Politics, 50(2), 147–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Botero, S. L. (2011). Hacia un nuevo debate sobre la descentralización en Colombia: el análisis intergubernamental desde una lectura institucional. Revista CS, 8, 211–243. https://doi.org/10.18046/recs.i8.1134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouckaert, G., Peters, B. G., & Verhoest, K. (2010). The coordination of public sector organizations. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Boxenbaum, E., & Jonsson, E. (2017). Isomorphism, diffusion, and decoupling: Concept evolution and theoretical challenges. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, T. B. Lawrence, & R. E. Meyer (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (2nd ed., pp. 77–101). SAGE.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bustos Gallardo, B., Lukas, M., Stamm, C., & Torre, A. (2019). Neoliberalismo y gobernanza territorial: propuestas y reflexiones a partir del caso de Chile. Revista de Geografía Norte Grande, 73, 161–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CEPAL. (2015). Memoria del primer Encuentro de Expertos Gubernamentales en Políticas de Desarrollo Territorial en América Latina y el Caribe. CEPAL.

    Google Scholar 

  • CEPAL. (2022). Una década de acción para un cambio de época. CEPAL.

    Google Scholar 

  • CEPAL, & Unidas, N. (2020). Informe Especial COVID-19 No 1. América Latina y el Caribe ante la pandemia del COVID-19. Efectos económicos y sociales, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers, D. A., Carlos, M. V., Katherine, H., Scott, B. M., Kerianne, P., & Monique, S. (1999). The New Politics of Inequality in Latin America Rethinking Participation and Representation, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cingolani, M. S. (2005). Relaciones intergubernamentales y descentralización: el papel de los mecanismos formales y fiscales de coordinación en la institucionalización de procesos desdentralizadores.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cisneros, P. (2019). What makes collaborative water governance partnerships resilient to policy change? A comparative study of two cases in Ecuador. Ecology and Society, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.5751/es-10667-240129

  • Cisneros, P., Cabrera-Barona, P., & López, V. (2020). Civil society and the 2030 Agenda. An assessment of the implementation of SDG-actions in the Metropolitan District of Quito. Revista Iberoamericana de Estudios de Desarrollo = Iberoamerican. Journal of Development Studies, 9(1), 100–119. https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_ried/ijds.431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cisneros, P., Christel, L. G., Novas, M. A., & Parrado, C., (2022). Las altas cortes y el cambio en las agendas intersectoriales en temas socioambientales en Argentina y Colombia. Manuscript submitted for publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, T. (2003). Canadian mining companies in Latin America: Community rights and corporate responsibility (pp. 1–43).

    Google Scholar 

  • Considine, M., Lewis, J. M., & Alexander, D. (2009). Networks, innovation and public policy: Politicians, bureaucrats and the pathways to change inside government. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cortés, O. L. Z. (2013). El estudio de las relaciones entre niveles de gobierno desde las relaciones intergubernamentales y la gobernanza multinivel. Estudios de Derecho, 70(156).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cravacuore, D. & Clemente, A. (2006). El proceso reciente de asociativismo intermunicipal en Argentina.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Mattos, C. A. (2010). Globalización y metamorfosis metropolitana en América Latina. De la ciudad a lo urbano generalizado. Revista de Geografía Norte Grande, 81–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Díaz, H. (2006). Relaciones intergubernamentales. Espacios Públicos, 9(18), 36–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diáz de Landa, M. (2007). Las relaciones intergubernamentales desde los gobiernos locales. In C. D. & I. R. (Ed.), Procesos políticos municipales comparados en Argentina y Chile (1990–2005) (pp. 229–270). Editorial Universidad Nacional de Quilmes.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falleti, T. G. (2005). A sequential theory of decentralization: Latin American cases in comparative perspective. American Political Science Review, 99(3), 327–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falleti, T. G. (2010). Decentralization and subnational politics in Latin America. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Faust, J., Arneth, F., von der Goltz, N., Harbers, I., Illerhues, J., & Scholms, M. (2008). Political fragmentation, Decentralization, and development cooperation. German Development Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiszbein, A. (1997). The emergence of local capacity: Lessons from Colombia. World Development, 25(7), 1029–1043.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flores, A. V., & Cenecorta, A. I. (2015). Gobernanza metropolitana como estrategia para planificar y gestionar el desarrollo de la Zona Metropolitana del Valle de Toluca. Revista de Estudios Regionales, 102(enero-abril), 91–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folke, C., Pritchard, L., Berkes, F., & Colding, J. (2007). The problem of fit between ecosystems and institutions: Ten years later. Ecology and Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freigedo, M., Milanesi, A., & Ferreira, C. (2020). RIA: aplicación de una metodología para el seguimiento de la localización de los ODS. Cuadernos Del CLAEH, 112, 119–132. https://doi.org/10.29192/claeh.39.2.8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gnangnon, S. K., & Brun, J. F. (2018). Impact of multilateral trade liberalization on resource revenue. Economies, 6(4), 60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldfrank, B. (2006). Los procesos de “presupuesto participativo” en América latina: éxito, fracaso y cambio. Revista de ciencia política (Santiago), 26(2), 3–28. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-090X2006000200001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez, E. J. (2014). What reverses decentralization? Failed policy implementation, civic supporters, or central bureaucrats’ expertise? The case of Brazil’s AIDS Program. Administration & Society, 46(8), 929–959. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399712469199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez, M. V. T., & Calderón, A. V. M. (2007). Programa para el mejoramiento de la calidad del aire en el Área Metropolitana del Valle de AburrÁ Contrato 158 de 2005. Producción Limpia, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grindle, M. S. (2000). Audacious reforms. John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grindle, M. S. (2009). Going local (3rd ed.). Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1992). Legitimation crisis (T. McCarthy, Trans.). Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haslam, P. A. (2007). The firm rules: Multinational corporations, policy space, and neoliberalism. Third World Quarterly, 28(6), 1167–1183. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436590701507594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helmke, G. R. F. J. (2011). Courts in Latin America. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Imperial, M. T. (2005). Using collaboration as a governance strategy lessons from six watershed management programs. Administration & Society, 37(3), 281–320. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399705276111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Institute for Human Rights and Business. (2012). State of play: The corporate responsibility to respect human rights in business relationships (pp. 1–180) http://www.ihrb.org/pdf/state-of-play/State-of-Play-Full-Report.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Irawati, B., & Srinivas, H. (2018). Localization of the SDGs: Role of local governments. The Bulletin of Yokohama City University Social Science., 70(2), 335–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez, J. P., & Ter-Minassian, T. (2016). Política fiscal y el ciclo en América Latina. El rol de los gobiernos subnacionales (Serie Macroeconomía Del Desarrollo) (pp. 1–43). CEPAL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klijn, E.-H., & Koppenjan, J. (2015). Governance networks in the public sector. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Knoepfel, P. (2018). Public policy resources. Policy Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Koliba, C., Meek, J. W., & Zia, A. (2010). Governance networks in public administration and public policy. CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kooiman, J. (1994). In J. Kooiman (Ed.), Modern governance. SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kooiman, J. (2003). Governing as governance. SAGE.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kramarz, T., Cosolo, D., & Rossi, A. (2016). Judicialization of environmental policy and the crisis of democratic accountability. Review of Policy Research, 34(1), 31–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lanfranchi, G., & Bidart, M. (2016). Gobernanza metropolitana en América Latina y el Caribe (pp. 1–222).

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, A. (2006). Políticas forestales nacionales y locales.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubell, M. (2004). Collaborative watershed management: A view from the grassroots. Policy Studies Journal, 32(3), 341–361. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2004.00069.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mancini, A. A. Á., & Pérez, B. M. E. F. (2006). El asociacionismo municipal en Argentina. Su aplicación para promover el desarrollo local y regional en Mendoza., Provincia, 11–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massiris, Á. (2015). Gestión territorial y desarrollo – Hacia una política de desarrollo territorial sostenible en América Latina. Editorial UPTC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medina, T. O. (2019a). El Rol Estratégico De Los Gobiernos Locales y Regionales En La Implementación De La Agenda 2030: Experiencias Desde La Cooperación Sur-Sur y Triangular. OASIS, 31, 9–29. https://doi.org/10.18601/16577558.n31.03

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medina, T. O. (2019b). Localization of the Sustainable Development Goals in border areas and cross-border South-South cooperation in Latin America. Aldea Mundo, 24(47), 27–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Méndez, J. L. (1997). The Latin American administrative tradition. International Encyclopaedia of Public Policy and Administration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Méndez, J. L. (2020). Políticas públicas. Enfoque estratégico para América Latina. Fondo de Cultura Económica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morales, D. (2020). Conceptualizing sub-national regional cooperation. Regions and Cohesion, 10(1), 61–87. https://doi.org/10.3167/reco.2020.100105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morata, F. (1990). Políticas públicas y relaciones intergubernamentales. Documentación Administrativa, 0(224–225). https://doi.org/10.24965/da.v0i224-225.5210

  • O’Donell, G. A. (1994). Delegative democracy. Journal of Democracy, 5(1), 55–69. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.1994.0010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peruzzotti, E. (2012). Broadening the notion of democratic accountability: Participatory innovation in Latin America. Polity, 44(4), 625–642. https://doi.org/10.1057/pol.2012.20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peruzzotti, E., & Smulovitz, C. (2002). Accountability social: la otra cara del control. In E. Peruzzotti (Ed.), Controlando la Política. Ciudadanos y Medios en las Nuevas Democracias Latinoamericanas (pp. 23–58). Editorial Temas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, B. G. (2018). The challenge of policy coordination. Policy Design and Practice, 1(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2018.1437946

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pianovi, M. R. (2008). Microregión misiones: Gestión asociada intermunicipal como estrategia de desarrollo local. 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proaño, J., Guillén, D., Deza, L. G., Guillén, P., Norabuena, R., & Sánchez, S. (2020). Factores predominantes de la participación ciudadana en el proceso de presupuesto participativo. Revista Inclusiones, 18–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quintero, R. (2006). Asociativismo Municipal en América Latina. Abya-Yala/FLACMA-DFID/GTZ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier, P. A. (1988). An advocacy coalition framework the policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein. Policy Sciences, 21(2–3), 129–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00136406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez, F., & Montero, M. G. (Eds.). (2019). Los ciclos políticos y económicos de América Latina y el boom de las materias primas. Tecnos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selee, A. (2004). Exploring the link between decentralization and democratic governance. Decentralization and democratic governance in Latin America, 3–36. Tulchin, J. S., & Selee, A. D. (Eds.). Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, Latin American Program.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sieder, R., Schjolden, L., & Angell, A. (Eds.). (2005). The judicialization of politics in Latin America. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-10887-6

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Slack, L. (2014). The post-2015 global agenda – A role for local government. Commonwealth Journal of Local Governance., 15, 173–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spink, P. (2005). The inter-municipal consortia in Brazil: An institutional introduction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, E., Tommasi, M., Echebarría, K., Lora, E., & Payne, M. (2006). La política de las políticas públicas. Progreso económico y social en América Latina, David Rockefeller Center for Latin American Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, P. F. (2012). Welcome to the jungle: Policy theory and political instability. In P. F. Steinberg & S. D. VanDeveer (Eds.), (pp. 255–312). MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuhldreher, A. M. (2020). Avanços e desafios do desenvolvimento sustentável no Uruguai y suas implicações territoriais: Um olhar a localização dos ODS em Tacuarembó. Redes (St. Cruz Online), 25(4), 1652–1675. https://doi.org/10.17058/redes.v25i4.14555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swyngedouw, E. (1997). Neither local nor global: ‘glocalization’ and the politics of scale. In K. Cox (Ed.), Spaces of globalization: Reasserting the power of the local. Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teles, F. (2016). Local governance and inter-municipal cooperation. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137445742

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tjandradewi, B. I., & Srinivas, H. (2019). Localization of SDGs: Role of local governments. The Bulletin of Yokohama City University Social Science, 70(2), 335–351. https://doi.org/10.15015/00001671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomàs, M. (2018). Modelos de gobernanza metropolitana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tosun, J., & Lang, A. (2017). Policy integration: Map** the different concepts. Policy Studies, 38(6), 533–570. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2017.1339239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trein, P., Biesbroek, R., Bolognesi, T., Cejudo, G. M., Duffy, R., Hustedt, T., & Meyer, I. (2020). Policy coordination and integration: A research agenda. Public Administration Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13180

  • United Nations. (2019). World population prospects 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Division of Economic and Social Affairs, S., Min, Y., & Perucci, F. (2020). Impact of COVID-19 on SDG Progress (United Nations). https://www.un-ilibrary.org/content/papers/27081990/24

  • Young, O. R. (2003). Environmental governance: The role of institutions in causing and confronting environmental problems. International Environmental Agreements, 3, 377–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zapata, J. A. (2007). Descentralización en Bolivia (Notas de Referencia). BID.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Cisneros .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Cisneros, P. (2022). Intergovernmental Relations and the Effective Implementation of Agenda 2030 in South America. In: The Palgrave Handbook of Global Social Problems. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68127-2_17-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68127-2_17-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-68127-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-68127-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Social SciencesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation