SpringerLink
Log in

Communication is Vital

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Interpersonal Interactions and Language Learning

  • 634 Accesses

Abstract

Communicating effectively is an important life skill that can influence career and personal life, but communicating using a language that is not one’s mother tongue can be complicated, especially for a learner. Since practice makes perfect, one of the best ways to improve communication is through communication itself. This chapter explores the importance of communication in language acquisition by looking at the developments in learning approaches and why communicative language teaching is now so popular. In addition, the relevant theories which support the role of communication or interaction in language learning are discussed, including Krashen’s input hypothesis, affective filter hypothesis, Swain’s comprehensible output hypothesis and Long’s interaction hypothesis. The changes and development brought about by technology in communication and language learning are also explored and linked to the Malaysian context. The chapter ends by highlighting the potential of discussion activity as a communicative task in a second-language classroom.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ariza, E. N., & Hancock, S. (2003). Second language acquisition theories as a framework for creating distance learning courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 4(2) Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/142/710

  • A. S. MD Abdul Haseeb. (2018, January 10). Higher education in the era of IR 4.0. New Straits Times. Retrieved from https://www.nst.com.my/education/2018/01/323591/higher-education-era-ir-40.

  • Asha Doshi. (2012). Changing tides: The story of the English language in Malaysia. In Zuraidah Mohd Don (Ed.), English in multicultural Malaysia: Pedagogy and applied research (pp. 15–30). Kuala Lumpur: University of Malaya Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton, D., & Lee, C. (2013). Language online: Investigating digital texts and practices. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bower, M. (2017). Technology integration as an educational imperative. In M. Bower (Ed.), Design of technology-enhanced learning: Integrating research and practice (pp. 1–16). Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, D. M. (2003). Learner-centered conditions that ensure students’ success in learning. Education, 124(1), 99–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaka, C. (2020). Online polylogues and the speech acts of online discussion forums. Journal of Educators Online, 17(2), 14–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chew, S. Y., & Ng, L. L. (2016). The relevance of personality and language proficiency on the participation style of ESL learners in face-to-face and online discussions. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 25(4), 605–613. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-016-0288-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chew, S. Y., & Ng, L. L. (2021). The influence of personality and language proficiency on ESL learners’ word contributions in face-to-face and synchronous online forums. Journal of Nusantara Studies, 6(1), 199–221. https://doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol6iss1pp199-221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, E., & Lotan, R. (2014). Designing groupwork: Strategies for the heterogeneous classroom (3rd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coker, D. (2020). Revolution in remote learning: A plan for radical improvement a policy recommendation to transform technology to improve student learning. In Proceedings of EdMedia + Innovate Learning (pp. 329–343). Online, The Netherlands: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/217457/.

  • Davis, H. S. (2013). Discussion as a bridge: Strategies that engage adolescent and adult learning styles in the postsecondary classroom. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 13(1), 68–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dos Santos, L. M. (2019). English language learning for engineering students: Application of a visual-only video teaching strategy. Global Journal of Engineering Education, 21(1), 37–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dos Santos, L. M. (2020). The discussion of communicative language teaching approach in language classrooms. Journal of Education and e-Learning Research, 7(2), 104–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, R. A., & Calvo, R. A. (2004). Learning through discussions in blended environments. Educational Media International, 41(3), 263–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523980410001680879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, S., Ward, C., Shaw, N., Walker, A., Knight, T., & Sutherland-Smith, W. (2020). Interprofessional education and practice guide no. 10: Develo**, supporting and sustaining a team of facilitators in online interprofessional education. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 34(1), 4–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitze, M. (2006). Discourse and participation in ESL face-to-face and written electronic conferences. Language Learning & Technology, 10(1), 67–86. Retrieved from https://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/bitstream/10125/44047/1/10_01_fitze.pdf

  • Götz, M., & Jankowska, B. (2017). Clusters and industry 4.0—Do they fit together? European Planning Studies, 25(9), 1633–1653. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2017.1327037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo, S. (2020). Task design to enhance learners’ collaboration and engagement in an online Chinese learning environment. In W. W. Ma, K. Tong, & W. B. A. Tso (Eds.), Learning environment and design (Educational Communications and Technology Yearbook) (pp. 159–174). Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8167-0_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2012). Student participation in online discussions: Challenges, solutions, and future research. New York, NY: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, C. (2020). Collaboration through online discussion board: A discourse analysis of CALL in a normal university in China. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on CALL(6), pp. 278–289. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/call6.18

  • Krashen, S. D. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krashen, S. D. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krashen, S. D. (1987). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. New York: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krashen, S. D. (1994). The input hypothesis and its rivals. In N. Ellis (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of language (pp. 45–77). London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krashen, S. D. (1996). Under attack: The case against bilingual education. Culver City, CA: Language Education Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavonen, J. (2017). Governance decentralisation in education: Finnish innovation in education. Revista De Educación a Distancia, 53(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.6018/red/53/1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lightbrown, P., & Spada, N. (2013). How languages are learned (4th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loewen, S., & Wolff, D. (2016). Peer interaction in F2F and CMC contexts. In M. Sato & S. Ballinger (Eds.), Peer interaction and second language learning: Pedagogical potential and research agenda (pp. 163–184). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Long, M. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie & T. Bhatia, Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matamoros-González, J. A., Rojas, M. A., Romero, J. P., Vera-Quiñonez, S., & Soto, S. T. (2017). English language teaching approaches: A comparison of the grammar-translation, audiolingual, communicative, and natural approaches. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 7(11), 965–973. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0711.04

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathew, D. I. R. (2020). Learner centered e-interactions: An exploration of context and practicality that influences e-learning experience. International Journal on E-Learning, 19(3), 229–241. Waynesville, NC: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/207622/.

  • McKay, S. L. (2018). English as an international language: What it is and what it means for pedagogy. RELC Journal, 49(1), 9–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688217738817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehrabi, M., & Homapour, S. (2018). The effect of the substrate type in virtual concurrent classes on the oral comprehension of the Iranian language learners: The case of Adobe Connect Platform and Skype Software. Language Related Research, 9(2), 251–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • MoE (Ministry of Education). (2015). English language education reform in Malaysia: The roadmap 2015–2025. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/35736437/The_Roadmap

  • Pica, T. (1994). Research on negotiation: What does it reveal about second-language learning conditions, processes, and outcomes? Language Learning, 44(3), 493–527. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1994.tb01115.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piskurich, G. M. (Ed.). (2003). The AMA handbook of e-learning: Effective design, implementation, and technology solutions. AMACOM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, S., & Squire, D. (2001). Ways of connecting media and learning. In J. Stephenson (Ed.), Teaching and learning online: Pedagogy for new technologies (pp. 207–218). London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahman, D. (2016). Changing how Malaysia (and the world) educates. The Star Online. Retrieved from https://www.thestar.com.my/opinion/online-exclusive/whats-your-status/2016/05/12/changing-how-malaysia-and-the-world-educates.

  • Rochat, N., Hauw, D., Gür, G., & Seifert, L. (2018). Understanding trail runners’ activity on online community forums: An inductive analysis of discussion topics. Journal of Human Kinetics, 61(1), 263–276. https://doi.org/10.1515/hukin-2017-0125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rovai, A. P. (2001). Building classroom community at a distance: A case study. Education Technology Research and Development, 49(4). Retrieved from https://www.aect.org/Intranet/Publications/etrd/4904.html.

  • Saaed, S., & Mohammed, A. (2020). The effect of using discussion boards on EFL writing classes: An action research case study. Academic Journal of Nawroz University, 9(3), 170–177. https://doi.org/10.25007/ajnu.v9n3a773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salomonsson, J. (2020). Modified output and learner uptake in casual online learner-learner conversation. System, 93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102306

  • Samuel, M., Tee, M. Y., & Symaco, L. P. (Eds.). (2017). Education in Malaysia: Developments and challenges. Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4427-4

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sani, R. (2018, February 7). Building capacity to increase English proficiency. News Straits Times. Retrieved from https://www.nst.com.my/education/2018/02/332968/building-capacity-increase-english-proficiency.

  • Sarifa, N. (2020). Enhancing EFL learners’ English proficiency and intelligence by implementing the eclectic method of language teaching. Arab World English Journal, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3581338

  • Setiyadi, A. B. (2020). Teaching English as a foreign language (2nd ed., pp. 1–163). Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu. ISBN 978-623-228-389-3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, G. P., & Klein, J. D. (1995). The effects of cued interaction and ability grou** during cooperative computer-based science instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 43(4), 5–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, R. (2018). Job hurdle. The Sun. Retrieved from https://www.pressreader.com/malaysia/the-sunmalaysia/20180123/281492161737768.

  • Smaldino, S. E., Lowther, D. L., & Russell, J. D. (2019). Instructional technology and media for learning (12th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • So, H.-J., Choi, H., Lim, W. Y., & **ong, Y. (2012). Little experience with ICT: Are they really the Net Generation student-teachers? Computers & Education, 59(4), 1234–1245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stapa, S. H. (2007). Socio-cognitive theory in second language learning: The use of online forum among adult distance learners. The International Journal of Learning, 14(7), 137–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suliman, A., Nor, M. Y. M., & Yunus, M. M. (2017). Dual Language Programme in Malaysian secondary schools: Glancing through the students’ readiness and unravelling the unheard voices. Gema Online Journal of Language Studies, 17(4), 128–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honour of H. G. Widdowson (pp. 125–144). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1995). Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: A step towards second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 16, 371–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tracy, B. (n.d.). Quotes.net. Retrieved from https://www.quotes.net/quote/54612.

  • Umar, I. N., & Mohamad Tarmizi Mohd Yusof. (2014). A study on Malaysian teachers’ level of ICT skills and practices, and its impact on teaching and learning. Procedia–Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 979–984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warschauer, M. (1996). Comparing face-to-face and electronic communication in the second language classroom. CALICO Journal, 13(2), 7–26. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v13i2-3.7-26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warschauer, M. (1997). Computer-mediated collaborative learning: Theory and practice. The Modern Language Journal, 81, 470–481. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1997.tb05514.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. A. (2001). Classroom conversations: Opportunities to learn for ESL students in mainstream classrooms. The Reading Teacher, 54(8) Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/20204989

  • Zhao, K., & Lei, C. (2017). Technology-enhanced content and language integrated learning in Chinese tertiary English classes: Potentials and challenges. In H. Reinders, D. Nunan, & B. Zou (Eds.), Innovation in language learning and teaching (pp. 89–113). London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-60092-9_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Languages and Linguistics, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

    Shin Yi Chew & Lee Luan Ng

Authors
  1. Shin Yi Chew
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lee Luan Ng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Chew, S.Y., Ng, L.L. (2021). Communication is Vital. In: Interpersonal Interactions and Language Learning. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67425-0_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67425-0_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-67424-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-67425-0

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation