Free Choice, Free Judgment, and Free Appetite (Albert the Great, De homine I)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Animal Minds in Medieval Latin Philosophy

Part of the book series: Studies in the History of Philosophy of Mind ((SHPM,volume 27))

  • 291 Accesses

Abstract

In his comprehensive treatise On Human Beings, Albert the Great discusses a large number of questions centring on the nature of humans. A fundamental question in this context is in what sense humans are unique. Therefore, Albert also raises various questions concerning the features and capacities of nonhuman animals. One of the features that Albert examines is what is commonly called ‘free choice’ (liberum arbitrium). His answer to the question of whether only humans or also nonhuman animals possess free choice focuses on various components of volition, namely, free appetite, free judgment, and free choice. For in order to choose something one needs to desire or to have an appetite for it. This, in turn, requires a judgment about what is desirable or not. Moreover, this appetite and this judgment must not be determined, because otherwise it could not be said that one has freely or voluntarily chosen something. Although Albert’s answer to the question of whether nonhuman animals possess free will is negative, it is illuminating insofar as it scrutinises the assumptions lying behind an ascription of free choice to an animal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    On this problem, see, for instance, Korolec (1982), 630.

  2. 2.

    Bernard of Clairvaux, De gratia et libero arbitrio VI.16, ed. Leclercq & Rochais (1963), 177f.

  3. 3.

    Albert the Great, De homine, eds. Anzulewicz & Söder (2008), 487.

  4. 4.

    Aristotle, Metaphysica I.1, 982b25f.

  5. 5.

    I.e. at the beginning of the first paragraph.

  6. 6.

    The editors of the Latin edition provide a list of people to whom Albert might refer in this passage; see Albert the Great, De homine, eds. Anzulewicz & Söder (2008), 507.

  7. 7.

    Unlike in other passages, the term ‘arbitrium’ is translated with ‘decision’ instead of ‘choice’ to make the phrase less tautological.

  8. 8.

    This definition actually appears in Peter Lombard’s Sententiae in IV libris distinctae, b. II, dist. 24, ch. 3, ed. Brady (1971), 452, but was commonly (mis)attributed to Augustine.

  9. 9.

    Aristotle, De anima III.9, 433a7f.

  10. 10.

    John of Damascus, De fide orthodoxa, c. 41 ( = II.27), ed. Buytaert (1955), 153.

  11. 11.

    A list of possible references, including Augustine, John of Damascus, and Avicenna, is provided by the editors of the Latin text; see Albert the Great, De homine, eds. Anzulewicz & Söder (2008), 508.

Bibliography

Primary Sources

  • Albert the Great. (2008). De homine (H. Anzulewicz & J. Söder, Eds.) (Opera omnia 27/2). Münster: Aschendorff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. (1957). Metaphysica (W. Jaeger, Ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. (1961). De anima (W. D. Ross, Ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard of Clairvaux. (1963). De gratia et libero arbitrio (J. Leclercq & H. M. Rochais, Eds.) (Opera III). Rome: Editiones Cistercienses.

    Google Scholar 

  • John of Damascus. (1955). De fide orthodoxa: Versions of Burgundius and Cerbanus (E. M. Buytaert, Ed.). St. Bonaventure: The Franciscan Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peter Lombard. (1971). Sententiae in IV libris distinctae, T. 1, P. 2, Liber I et II (I. Brady, Ed.). Grottaferrata: Collegium S. Bonaventurae Ad Claras Aquas.

    Google Scholar 

Secondary Sources

  • Korolec, J. B. (1982). Free will and free choice. In A. Kenny, E. Stump, J. Pinborg, & N. Kretzmann (Eds.), The Cambridge history of later medieval philosophy: From the rediscovery of Aristotle to the disintegration of scholasticism, 1100–1600 (pp. 629–641). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Oelze, A. (2021). Free Choice, Free Judgment, and Free Appetite (Albert the Great, De homine I). In: Animal Minds in Medieval Latin Philosophy. Studies in the History of Philosophy of Mind, vol 27. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67012-2_21

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation