A Taxonomy of Defensive Deception

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Game Theory for Cyber Deception

Part of the book series: Static & Dynamic Game Theory: Foundations & Applications ((SDGTFA))

  • 1149 Accesses

Abstract

The game theory described in Chaps. 2 and 3 offers versatile possibilities for quantifying cyber deception. Yet specific game-theoretic models must be carefully chosen in order to model different types of deception. In this chapter, therefore, we propose a taxonomy that classifies deception into six categories. We then propose game-theoretic models that fittingly describe each category. Our analysis is based on both theoretical considerations and an empirical study of 25 recent articles in game theory for defensive cyber deception. The taxonomy provides a systematic foundation for understanding the three types of defensive deception that we study in Chaps. 57.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 93.08
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
EUR 117.69
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
EUR 117.69
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    TrackMeNot, ConcealGAN, and other practical deception implementations mentioned in this section do not use game theory, so they are not included the 25 research works mentioned in Table 4.1.

  2. 2.

    The most fine-grained species in a taxonomy are sometimes called the infimae species. Hence, we will sometimes refer to “types” of deception more formally as infimae species.

  3. 3.

    Here, we consider one-shot games to be static even if they are not simultaneous-move games.

  4. 4.

    Future research can consider cooperative games, but most current studies use non-cooperative models.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeffrey Pawlick .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Pawlick, J., Zhu, Q. (2021). A Taxonomy of Defensive Deception. In: Game Theory for Cyber Deception. Static & Dynamic Game Theory: Foundations & Applications. Birkhäuser, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66065-9_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation