Abstract
In this chapter, we argue that paying attention to the mundane aspects of work enriches our understanding of individuals’ lived experience in organizations. While capturing these mundane aspects can be carried through video-ethnography, we propose that mundane data found on social media might also lead to such investigation. Using examples from our previous work, we explore how mundane data found on social media can reveal dimensions of work practices. We then show that it can offer a valuable contribution to video-ethnographic methods.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
For copyright reasons, we were not able to include any of the posts that we have collected in the course of our research on working out loud. We hence offer this example produced by one of us, as we also, from time to time, engage in working out loud on social media. It should be noted that this post was not included in our data collection, but was chosen to provide an illustration for this chapter.
References
Abidin, C., & De Seta, G. (2020). Private messages from the field. Journal of Digital Social Research, 2(1), 1–19.
Bonneau, C., Endrissat, N., & Sergi, V. (n.d.). Social media as a new workspace: How working out loud (re)materializes work. In Artefacts, materiality and practices. Palgrave.
Bonneau, C., & Sergi, V. (2018). Sharing and accessing the mundane dimensions of work on social media: The role of mediated visibility for workers and researchers. Presented at the panel “More than meets the eyes: the lens of visibility in Internet research”. Conference of the Association of Internet Researchers (AoIR2018), Montréal (Canada).
Brekhus, W. (2000). A mundane manifesto. Journal of Mundane Behavior, 1(1), 89–105.
Devreux, G. (1967). From anxiety to method in the behavioural sciences. Mouton & Co.
Dubois, E., & Ford, H. (2015). Qualitative political communication| trace interviews: An actor-centered approach. International Journal of Communication, 9(25).
Falzon, M. A. (2016). Introduction: Multi-sited ethnography: Theory, praxis and locality in contemporary research. In M.-A. Falzon (Ed.), Multi-sited ethnography: Theory, praxis and locality in contemporary research (pp. 1–23). Routledge.
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Prentice-Hall.
Gherardi, S. (2017). One turn… and now another one: Do the turn to practice and the turn to affect have something in common? Management Learning, 48(3), 345–358.
Gherardi, S., Murgia, A., Bellè, E., Miele, F., & Carreri, A. (2019). Tracking the sociomaterial traces of affect at the crossroads of affect and practice theories. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management, 14(3), 295–316.
Green, N. (2001). How everyday life became virtual: Mundane work at the juncture of production and consumption. Journal of Consumer Culture, 1(1), 73–92.
Gregg, M. (2004). A mundane voice. Cultural Studies, 18(2–3), 363–383.
Hand, M. (2012). Ubiquitous photography. Polity.
Heath, C., Knoblauch, H., & Luff, P. (2000). Technology and social interaction: The emergence of ‘workplace studies’. The British Journal of Sociology, 51(2), 299–320.
Hine, C. (2015). Ethnography for the Internet: Embedded, embodied and everyday. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Hine, C. (2017). Research methods for digital work: Innovative methods for studying distributed and multi-modal working practices. Retrieved January 5, 2017, from http://www.ias.surrey.ac.uk/workshops/workpractices/cfp.php.
Kisfalvi, V. (2006). Subjectivity and emotions as sources of insight in an ethnographic case study: A tale of the field. Management, 9(3), 117–135.
Laestadius, L. (2017). Instagram. In A. Quan-Haase & L. Sloan (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of social media research methods (pp. 573–592). Sage.
Latzko-Toth, G., Bonneau, C., & Millette, M. (2017). Small data, thick data: Thickening strategies for trace-based social media research. In A. Quan-Haase & L. Sloan (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of social media research methods (pp. 199–214). Sage.
Le Breton, D. (2006). La saveur du monde: une anthropologie des sens. Éd. Métailié.
Leonardi, P. M., & Vaast, E. (2017). Social media and their affordances for organizing: A review and agenda for research. The Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 150–188.
Marcus, G. E. (1995). Ethnography in/of the world system: The emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, 95–117.
Nicolini, D. (2013). Practice theory, work, and organization: An introduction. Oxford University Press.
Oostervink, N., Agterberg, M., & Huysman, M. (2016). Knowledge sharing on enterprise social media: Practices to cope with institutional complexity. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 21(2), 156–176.
Orlikowski, W. J., & Scott, S. V. (2016). Digital work: A research agenda. In B. Czarniawska (Ed.), A research agenda for management and organization studies (pp. 88–96). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Pink, S. (2012). Advances in visual methodology. Sage.
Pink, S., Sumartojo, S., Lupton, D., & Heyes La Bond, C. (2017). Mundane data: The routines, contingencies and accomplishments of digital living. Big Data & Society, 4(1), 1–12.
Postill, J., & Pink, S. (2012). Social media ethnography: The digital researcher in a messy web. Media International Australia, 145, 123–134.
Reckwitz, A. (2002). Toward a theory of social practices: A development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory, 5(2), 243–263.
Schatzki, T. R. (2001). Introduction—Practice theory. In T. R. Schatzki, K. Knorr-Cetina, & E. von Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 1–14). London: Routledge.
Schmidt, K. (2011). Cooperative work and coordinative practices. Springer.
Schmidt, K. (2016). Reflections on the visibility and invisibility of work. In Boundary objects and beyond: Working with Leigh Star (pp. 345–349). MIT Press.
Schmidt, K., & Bannon, L. (1992). Taking CSCW seriously: Supporting articulation work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 1(1), 7–40.
Sergi, V., & Bonneau, C. (2016). Making mundane work visible on social media: A CCO investigation of working out loud on Twitter. Communication Research and Practice, 2(3), 378–406.
Sergi, V., & Hallin, A. (2011). Thick performances, not just thick descriptions: The processual nature of qualitative research. Qualitative Research in Organization and Management, 6(2), 191–208.
Shortt, H. (2015). Liminality, space and the importance of ‘transitory dwelling places’ at work. Human Relations, 68(4), 633–658.
Star, S. L., & Strauss, A. (1999). Layers of silence, arenas of voice: The ecology of visible and invisible work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 8(1–2), 9–30.
Strauss, A. (1985). Work and the division of labour. Sociological Quarterly, 26(1), 1–19.
Suchman, L. (2000). Making a case: Knowledge and routine work in document production. In P. Luff, J. Hindmarsh, & C. Heath (Eds.), Workplace studies: Recovering work practice and informing system design (pp. 29–45). Cambridge University Press.
Suchman, L., Blomberg, J., Orr, J., & Trigg, R. (1999). Reconstructing technologies as social practice. American Behavioral Scientist Behavioral Scientist, 34(3), 392–408.
Wilhoit, E. D. (2017). Photo and video methods in organizational and managerial communication research. Management Communication Quarterly, 31(3), 447–466.
Wilhoit, E. D., & Kisselburgh, L. G. (2016). Through the eyes of the participant: Making connections between researcher and subject with participant viewpoint ethnography. Field Methods, 28(2), 208–226.
Wolf, C. T. (2016). DIY videos on YouTube: Identity and possibility in the age of algorithms. First Monday, 21(6). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v21i6.6787.
Woolgar, S., & Neyland, D. (2014). Mundane governance: Ontology and accountability. Oxford University Press.
Ybema, S., Yanow, D., Welsh, H., & Kamsteeg, F. (2009). Organizational ethnography: Studying the complexities of everyday life. Sage.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sergi, V., Bonneau, C. (2021). Complementing Video-Ethnography: The Uses and Potential of Mundane Data Collected on Social Media. In: Grosjean, S., Matte, F. (eds) Organizational Video-Ethnography Revisited. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65551-8_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65551-8_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-65550-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-65551-8
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)