Abstract
This chapter examines the notion of therapy and its growing significance in the social, political, and affective life in China during the last four decades. Specifically, it explores the ways in which the languages, ideas, and practices of psychology have been applied to various domains for different purposes and imperatives including addressing the current mental health epidemic. This therapeutic ethos acts as both a mode of thinking and imagination. Since therapy suggests an illness or disease and it encompasses a dual process that both diagnoses (identifies an issue) and prescribes (offers solutions), this understanding can thus be easily appended to governance, problematizing (pathologizing, thus individualizing) social issues, and then proposing solutions. This mode of therapeutic governing involves a unique mode of psychologization in China, in which psychological expertise can be dispensed by non-experts with real consequences. It centers on the management of subjectivity. This mode of therapeutic governing accesses people’s subjectivity through “care” and “permissive empathy” that renews the government’s role as the “guardian of the people”. This chapter contends that the ways this therapeutic ethos involved in Chinese society manifest the implicit complicity among therapy, the state, and market.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bartlett, N. (2018). Idling in Mao’s shadow: Heroin addiction and the contested therapeutic value of socialist traditions of laboring. Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry, 42(1), 49–68.
Bourdieu, P. (2000). Making the economic habitus: Algerian workers revisited. Ethnography, 1, 17–41.
Canguilhem, G. (1989). The normal and the pathological: Georges Canguilhem, with an introduction by Michel Foucault, translated by Carolyn R. Fawcett in collaboration with Robert S. Cohen. New York: Zone Books.
Chen, Z. (2010). Resolving the pain/threats posed by the mentally ill. Outlook Weekly, May 31, 36–37.
Farquhar, J., & Zhang, Q-S. (2012). Ten thousand things: Nurturing life in contemporary Bei**g. New York: Zone Books.
Furedi, F. (2004). Therapy culture. London: Routledge.
Hacking, I. (1986) The invention of split personalities. In A. Donagan et al. (Eds.), Human Nature and Natural Knowledge (pp. 63–85). Dordrecht: Reidel.
Huang, H.-Y. (2014). The emergence of the psycho-boom in contemporary urban China. In H. Chiang (Ed.), Psychiatry and Chinese history (pp. 183–204). London: Pickering & Chatto.
Illouz, E. (2008). Saving the modern soul: Therapy, emotions, and the culture of self-help. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Kipnis, A. (1997). Producing Guanxi: Sentiment, self, and subculture in a North China Village. Durham: Duke University Press.
Kleinman, A. (2010). The art of medicine: Remaking the moral person in China: Implications for health. The Lancet, 375(9720), 1074–1075.
Kuan, T. (2015). Love’s uncertainty: The politics and ethics of child rearing in contemporary China. Oakland: University of California Press.
Liang, Y. (2017). Yearender-China Focus: China’s “Buddha-like” Youth Quietly Accept Life for What It Is. **nhuanet.http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/2017-12/28/c_136857895.htm
Liu, Y. (2008). **ntai Gaibian Mingyun (Attitude Changes One’s Fate). Audio-Visual Press of China’s National Administrative Academy.
Mattyssen, M. (2015). Zheng Banqiao’s Nande Hutu and ‘the art of being muddled’ in contemporary China. Contemporary Chinese Thought, 46(4), 3–25.
Miller, P., & Rose, N. (1994). On therapeutic authority: Psychoanalytic expertise under advanced liberalism. History of the Human Sciences, 7(30), 29–64.
Munro, R. (2002). Dangerous minds: Political psychiatry in China today and its origins in the Mao era. New York: Human Rights Watch and Geneva Initiative on Psychiatry.
Nolan, J. L. (1998). The therapeutic state: Justifying government at century’s end. New York: New York University Press.
Parsons, T. (1965). Social structure and personality. New York: Free Press.
Polsky, A. J. (1991). The rise of the therapeutic state. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Shi, L. (2017). “The people’s daily discusses ‘Buddha-like youth’: If one follows the trends, they will lose their selves.” https://new.qq.com/omn/20171212/20171212G0ZBVS.html
Shi, T., & Lu, J. (2010). Cultural impacts on people’s understanding of democracy. Paper presented at the 2010 American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Washington, D.C., September 1–5.
Szasz, T. S. (2001). The therapeutic state: The tyranny of pharmacy. The Independent Review, 4, 485–521.
Teo, T. (2018). Homo Neoliberalus: From personality to forms of subjectivity. Theory & Psychology, 28(5), 581–599.
Watters, E. (2011). Crazy Like Us: The Globalization of the American Psyche.New York, London, Toronto, Sydney: Free Press.
**n Shi **ang. (2017) The First Group Who Were Born in the 1990s Have Already Become Monks.https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/31934937
Yang, J. (2015). Unknotting the heart: Unemployment and therapeutic governance in China. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Yang, J. (2018a). Mental health in China: Change, tradition, and therapeutic governance. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Yang, J. (2018b). ‘Officials’ heartache’: Depression, bureaucracy, and therapeutic governance in China. Current Anthropology, 58(5), 596–615.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Yang, J. (2021). The Rise of the Therapeutic in Contemporary China. In: Minas, H. (eds) Mental Health in China and the Chinese Diaspora: Historical and Cultural Perspectives. International and Cultural Psychology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65161-9_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65161-9_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-65160-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-65161-9
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)