Historicism, Science Fiction, and the Singularity

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Minding the Future

Part of the book series: Science and Fiction ((SCIFICT))

  • 1142 Accesses

Abstract

Many writers who have discussed the Singularity have treated it not only as the inevitable outcome of advancements in cybernetic technology, but also as natural consequence of broader patterns in the development of human knowledge, or of human history itself. In this paper I examine these claims—as defended by Vernor Vinge, Ray Kurzweil, and David Chalmers—in light of Karl Popper’s famous philosophical critique of historicism. I argue that, because the Singularity is regarded as both a product of human ingenuity and a reflection of the permanent limitations of our rational capacities, speculation about its likelihood occupies an interesting border zone between what Popper referred to as “technological prediction” and what he lambasted as “prophecy.” I go on to examine representations of a post-singularity world in the novels of Iain M. Banks, as well as in Bruce Sterling’s short story “The Beautiful and the Sublime.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 34.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Concerning the broader characteristics of metanarratives, see [1, p. xxiv].

  2. 2.

    If one accepts Popper’s claim from later in the same work that what he calls the “descriptive” and “argumentative” functions of language are irreducible to its “signalling” and “expressive” functions [3, pp. 82–3], it will certainly seem reasonable to draw the weaker conclusion that, to the extent that the historical influence of a scientific theory depends upon its performance of the former pair of functions, not all of its effects could be predicted in the absence of understanding its content.

  3. 3.

    For the classic defence of this view, see [4]. See also [5] for an account of how this view of the explanatory range of lawlike generalizations about human history was prefigured in the work of authors such as Humboldt, Ranke, Rickert, and Simmel. For Donald Davidson’s discussion of the difference between homonomic and heteronomic generalizations, see [6].

  4. 4.

    See, e.g., the discussion in the following section of Ray Kurzweil’s ostensible “law” of “accelerating returns.”

  5. 5.

    For a lively and contentious discussion of the claim, with special reference to the human language faculty, see [10].

  6. 6.

    I.e. “a feeling of pain arising from a want of accordance between the aesthetical estimation of magnitude formed by the imagination and estimation of the same formed by reason…which arouses within us the feeling of our supersensible destination, according to which it is purposive and therefore pleasurable to find every standard of sensibility inadequate to the ideas of understanding” [15, pp. 96–7].

  7. 7.

    It is perhaps worth mentioning in this connection that Sterling’s story was first published in 1986, well before the dawn of the smartphone.

  8. 8.

    When asked in an interview why he returned to writing Culture novels after taking a hiatus to compose some mainstream literary novels, Banks replied “[t]hat’s where I want to live, that’s my utopia. It’s what I want to go home in” [18, p. 15].

  9. 9.

    See, for example, the lively IM exchanges at [20, pp. 214–219, 318]. For an example of Banks’ attention in detail, see his description of the Vavatch Orbital in [19, pp. 101–2].

References

  1. Lyotard, J.: The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge, trans. Bennington. G. and Masumi, B. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Popper, K.: The Poverty of Historicism. Routledge, London (1957)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Popper, K.: In: Bartley III, W.W. (ed.) The Open Universe: An Argument from Indeterminism. Routledge, London (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fodor, J.: Special sciences (or: the disunity of science as a working hypothesis). Synthese. 28, 97–115 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Beiser, F.: The German Historicist Tradition. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Davidson, D.: Mental events. In: Davidson, D. (ed.) Essays on Actions and Events, pp. 219–220. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Vinge, V.: The coming technological singularity: how to survive in a post-human era. NASA Technical Reports Server (2013). https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19940022856.pdf Accessed 27 August 2019

  8. Clark, A.: Natural Born Cyborgs: Minds, Technologies, and the Future of Human Intelligence. Oxford University Press, New York (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kurzweil, R.: The Singularity is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology. Penguin Books, London (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pinker, S., Jackendoff, R.: The faculty of language: what’s special about it? Cognition. 92, 205–236 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cogburn, J., Silcox, M.: Computability theory and ontological emergence. Am. Philos. Q. 48, 63–74 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kurzweil, R.: How my predictions are faring — an update by Ray Kurzweil. Kurzweil: Accelerating Intelligence. https://www.kurzweilai.net/how-my-predictions-are-faring-an-update-by-ray-kurzweil (2010). Accessed 6 June 2019

  13. Kurzweil, R.: A wager on the Turing test: why I think I will win. Kurzweil: Accelerating Intelligence. https://www.kurzweilai.net/a-wager-on-the-turing-test-why-i-think-i-will-win (2002). Accessed 4 June, 2019

  14. Chalmers, D.: The singularity: a philosophical analysis. In: Awret, U. (ed.) The Singularity (Journal of Consciousness Studies), pp. 7–65. Imprint Academic, Exeter (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kant, I.: Critique of Judgment, trans. Bernard, J. Hafner, New York (1951)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sterling, B.: The beautiful and the sublime. In: Sterling, B. (ed.) Crystal Express, pp. 181–209. Ace Books, New York (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sterling, B.: The singularity: your future as a black hole. The Long Now Foundation. http://longnow.org/seminars/02004/jun/11/the-singularity-your-future-as-a-black-hole (2004). Accessed 5 July, 2019

  18. Dibdin, T.: Big words and the small screen. The List. 281, 15 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Banks, I.: Consider Phlebas. Hachette, New York (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Banks, I.: Excession. Bantam, New York (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Banks, I.: The Hydrogen Sonata. Orbit, New York (2012)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark Silcox .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Silcox, M. (2021). Historicism, Science Fiction, and the Singularity. In: Dainton, B., Slocombe, W., Tanyi, A. (eds) Minding the Future. Science and Fiction. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64269-3_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation