Abstract
Nowadays, systems containing components based on machine learning (ML) methods are becoming more widespread. In order to ensure the intended behavior of a software system, there are standards that define necessary quality aspects of the system and its components (such as ISO/IEC 25010). Due to the different nature of ML, we have to adjust quality aspects or add additional ones (such as trustworthiness) and be very precise about which aspect is really relevant for which object of interest (such as completeness of training data), and how to objectively assess adherence to quality requirements. In this article, we present the construction of a quality model (i.e., evaluation objects, quality aspects, and metrics) for an ML system based on an industrial use case. This quality model enables practitioners to specify and assess quality requirements for such kinds of ML systems objectively. In the future, we want to learn how the term quality differs between different types of ML systems and come up with general guidelines for specifying and assessing qualities of ML systems.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Wan, Z., **a, X., Lo, D., Murphy, G.C.: How does machine learning change software development practices? IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 1 (2019)
Sculley, D., et al.: Hidden technical debt in machine learning systems. In: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 2503–2511 (2015)
Zhang, J.M., Harman, M., Ma, L., Liu, Y.: Machine learning testing: survey, landscapes and horizons. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 1 (2020)
ISO/IEC 25010:2011: Systems and software engineering—Systems and software Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQuaRE)—System and software quality models
ISO/TS 8000:2011: Data Quality
High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence: Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI. European Commission (2019)
DIN SPEC 92001-01: Künstliche Intelligenz - Life Cycle Prozesse und Qualitätsanforderungen. Teil 1: Qualitäts-Meta-Modell. Beuth Verlag GmbH, Berlin
Hamada, K., Ishikawa, F., Masuda, S., Matsuya, M., Ujita, Y.: Guidelines for quality assurance of machine learning-based artificial intelligence. In: SEKE2020: the 32nd International Conference on Software Engineering & Knowledge Engineering, pp. 335–341 (2020)
Trustworthy Use of Artificial Intelligence. Priorities from a Philosophical, Ethical, Legal, and Technological Viewpoint as a Basis for Certification of Artificial Intelligence. Fraunhofer Institute for Intelligent Analysis and Information Systems IAIS Schloss Birlinghoven (2019)
From Principles to Practice. An interdisciplinary framework to operationalise AI ethics. VDE, Bertelsmann Stiftung (2020)
Marselis, R., Shaukat, H., Gansel, T.: Testing of Artificial Intelligence. Sogeti, Paris (2017)
Marselis, R., Shaukat, H.: Machine Intelligence Quality Characteristics. How to Measure the Quality of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics. Sogeti, Paris (2018)
Nakajima, S.: Quality assurance of machine learning software. In: 2018 IEEE 7th Global Conference on Consumer Electronics (GCCE), 9–12 October 2018, pp. 601–604. IEEE, Piscataway (2018)
Mariscal, G., Marbán, Ó., Fernández, C.: A survey of data mining and knowledge discovery process models and methodologies. Knowl. Eng. Rev. 25, 137–166 (2010)
Martinez-Plumed, F., et al.: CRISP-DM twenty years later: from data mining processes to data science trajectories. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 1 (2020)
Lwakatare, L.E., Raj, A., Bosch, J., Olsson, H.H., Crnkovic, I.: A taxonomy of software engineering challenges for machine learning systems: an empirical investigation. In: Kruchten, P., Fraser, S., Coallier, F. (eds.) XP 2019. LNBIP, vol. 355, pp. 227–243. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19034-7_14
Amershi, S., et al.: Software engineering for machine learning: a case study. In: 2019 IEEE/ACM 41st International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Practice (ICSE-SEIP), pp. 291–300 (2019)
Hossin, M., Sulaiman, M.N.: A review on evaluation metrics for data classification evaluations. IJDKP 5, 1–11 (2015)
Emmons, S., Kobourov, S., Gallant, M., Börner, K.: Analysis of network clustering algorithms and cluster quality metrics at scale. PLoS ONE 11, e0159161 (2016)
Barocas, S., Boyd, D.: Engaging the ethics of data science in practice. Commun. ACM 60, 23–25 (2017)
Kleinberg, J., Mullainathan, S., Raghavan, M.: Inherent Trade-Offs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scores. ar**v.org (2016)
Wagner, S., et al.: Operationalised product quality models and assessment: the Quamoco approach. Inf. Softw. Technol. 62, 101–123 (2015)
Kaufman, S., Rosset, S., Perlich, C.: Leakage in data mining. In: Apte, C., Ghosh, J., Smyth, P. (eds.) Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, San Diego, Ca, USA, 21–24 August 2011, p. 556. ACM, New York (2011)
Kläs, M., Vollmer, A.M.: Uncertainty in machine learning applications: a practice-driven classification of uncertainty. In: Gallina, B., Skavhaug, A., Schoitsch, E., Bitsch, F. (eds.) SAFECOMP 2018. LNCS, vol. 11094, pp. 431–438. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99229-7_36
Nakamichi, K., et al.: Requirements-driven method to determine quality characteristics and measurements for machine learning software and its evaluation. In: 28th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE’20)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Siebert, J. et al. (2020). Towards Guidelines for Assessing Qualities of Machine Learning Systems. In: Shepperd, M., Brito e Abreu, F., Rodrigues da Silva, A., Pérez-Castillo, R. (eds) Quality of Information and Communications Technology. QUATIC 2020. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1266. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58793-2_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58793-2_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-58792-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-58793-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)