Correction for Optimisation Bias in Structured Sparse High-Dimensional Variable Selection

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Nonparametric Statistics (ISNPS 2018)

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics ((PROMS,volume 339))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1131 Accesses

Abstract

In sparse high-dimensional data, the selection of a model can lead to an overestimation of the number of nonzero variables. Indeed, the use of an \(\ell _1\) norm constraint while minimising the sum of squared residuals tempers the effects of false positives, thus they are more likely to be included in the model. On the other hand, an \(\ell _0\) regularisation is a non-convex problem and finding its solution is a combinatorial challenge which becomes unfeasible for more than 50 variables. To overcome this situation, one can perform selection via an \(\ell _1\) penalisation but estimate the selected components without shrinkage. This leads to an additional bias in the optimisation of an information criterion over the model size. Used as a stop** rule, this IC must be modified to take into account the deviation of the estimation with and without shrinkage. By looking into the difference between the prediction error and the expected Mallows’s Cp, previous work has analysed a correction for the optimisation bias and an expression can be found for a signal-plus-noise model given some assumptions. A focus on structured models, in particular, grouped variables, shows similar results, though the bias is noticeably reduced.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 160.49
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
EUR 213.99
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
EUR 213.99
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    A similar discussion would hold for any distance between selected and true model.

References

  1. Akaike, H.: Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: B.N. Petrov, F. Csáki (eds) Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Information Theory, pp. 267–281. Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Donoho, D.L.: For most large underdetermined systems of equations, the minimal \(\ell _1\)-norm near-solution approximates the sparsest near-solution. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 59, 907–934 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Friedman, J., Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R.: Sparse inverse covariance estimation with the graphical lasso. Biostatistics 9(3), 432–441 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jansen, M.: Information criteria for variable selection under sparsity. Biometrika 101, 37–55 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Mallows, C.L.: Some comments on cp. Technometrics 15, 661–675 (1973)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Meinshausen, N., Bühlmann, P.: High-dimensional graphs and variable selection with the lasso. Annal. Stat. 34, 1436–1462 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Stein, C.: Inadmissibility of the usual estimator for the mean of a multivariate normal distribution. In: J. Neyman (ed), Proceedings of the Third Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, pp. 197–206. University of California Press (1956)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tibshirani, R.: Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 58, 267–288 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tibshirani, R., Saunders, M., Rosset, S., Zhu, J., Knight, K.: Sparsity and smoothness via the fused lasso. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 67(1), 91–108 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wainwright, M.J.: Sharp thresholds for high-dimensional and noisy sparsity recovery using \(\ell _1\)-constrained quadratic programming (lasso). IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 55(5), 2183–2202 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Ye, J.: On measuring and correcting the effects of data mining and model selection. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 93, 120–131 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Yuan, M., Lin, Y.: Model selection and estimation in regression with grouped variables. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 68(1), 49–67 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zhao, P., Rocha, G., Yu, B.: The composite absolute penalties family for grouped and hierarchical variable selection. Annal. Stat. 37, 3468–3497 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhao, P., Yu, B.: On model selection consistency of lasso. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 7, 2541–2563 (2006)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bastien Marquis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Marquis, B., Jansen, M. (2020). Correction for Optimisation Bias in Structured Sparse High-Dimensional Variable Selection. In: La Rocca, M., Liseo, B., Salmaso, L. (eds) Nonparametric Statistics. ISNPS 2018. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics, vol 339. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57306-5_32

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation