Abstract
In this chapter we seek to elucidate the potential of linguistic analysis in the undercover pursuit of criminals online. We examine the relationship between language and online identity performance and address the question of what linguistic analysis is necessary and sufficient to describe an online linguistic persona to the extent it could be successfully assumed by another individual. We compare the performance of trainee undercover officers (UCOs) at online impersonation of a specific individual before receiving any linguistic training to their performance after such input. We also report on a series of experiments in which participants engaged with each other over Instant Messaging (IM), before an impersonation situation was engineered. Information was collected about what level of accuracy and confidence individuals can detect the substitution of one interlocutor with another, what linguistic criteria give rise to such suspicions, and how individuals prepare for impersonation tasks. We also draw on other data sets including from police training and operational settings where identity disguise is employed online in the context of investigations into child grooming and the distribution of abusive images.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aldridge, M. (2010). Vulnerable Witnesses in the Criminal Justice System. In M. Coulthard & A. Johnson (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Forensic Linguistics (pp. 296–314). Abingdon: Routledge.
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do Things with Words. Oxford: Clarendon.
Berk-Seligson, S. (2002). The Bilingual Courtroom: Court Interpreters in the Judicial Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Butters, R. (2008). A Linguistic Look at Trademark Dilution. Santa Clara High Technology Journal, 24, 3.
Chiang, E., & Grant, T. (2017). Online Grooming: Moves and Strategies. Language and Law/Linguagem E Direito, 4(1), 103–141.
Dumas, B. (2012). Language of Jury Instructions. In C. Chappelle (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Chichester: Wiley.
Eades, D. (1992). Aboriginal English and the Law: Communicating with Aboriginal English Speaking Clients: A Handbook for Legal Practitioners. Brisbane: Queensland Law Society.
Eades, D. (2002). Evidence Given in Unequivocal Terms: Gaining Consent of Aboriginal Young People in Court. In J. Cotterill (Ed.), Language in the Legal Process (pp. 161–196). London: Palgrave.
Ehrlich, S. (2001). Representing Rape: Language and Sexual Consent. London: Routledge.
Grant, T. (2010). Text Messaging Forensics: Txt 4n6: Idiolect Free Authorship Analysis? In M. Coulthard & A. Johnson (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Forensic Linguistics (pp. 508–522). Abingdon: Routledge.
Grant, T. (2017). Duppying Yoots in a Dog Eat Dog World, Kmt’: Determining the Senses of Slang Terms for the Courts. Semiotica, 2017(216), 479–495.
Gumperz, J. (1982). Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hale, S. (2004). The Discourse of Court Interpreting. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Herring, S. (2004). Computer-Mediated Discourse Analysis: An Approach to Researching Online Behavior. In S. A. Barab, R. Kling, & J. H. Gray (Eds.), Designing for Virtual Communities in the Service of Learning (pp. 338–376). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Heydon, G. (2005). The Language of Police Interviewing: A Critical Analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Internet Watch Foundation. 2013. Annual Report. https://www.iwf.org.uk/report/2013-annual-report.
MacLeod, N. (2016). “I Thought I’d be Safe There”: Pre-Empting Blame in the Talk of Women Reporting Rape. Journal of Pragmatics, 96, 96–109.
Grant. T., & MacLeod, N. (Forthcoming). Language and Online Identities: The Undercover Policing of Internet Sexual Crime. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
MacLeod, N., & Grant, T. 2012. Whose Tweet?: Authorship Analysis of Micro-Blogs and Other Short form Messages. Electronic Proceedings of the International Association of Forensic Linguists’ 10th Biennial Conference, Aston University, Birmingham, UK, July 2011. www.linguisticaforense.ufsc.br/tiki-index.php?page=IAFL+2011.
MacLeod, N., & Grant, T. (2017). ‘Go on Cam But Don’t be Dirty’: Linguistic Levels of Identity Assumption in Undercover Online Operations Against Child Sex Abusers. Language and Law/Linguagem E Direito, 4(2), 157–175.
MacLeod, N., & Haworth, K. 2016. Develo** a linguistically Informed Approach to Police Interviewing. In R. Lawson & D. Sayers (Eds.), Sociolinguistic Research: Application and Impact. Abingdon: Routledge.
Martellozzo, E. 2012. Online Child Sexual Abuse: Grooming, Policing and Child Protection in a Multi-Media World. London: Routledge.
Nini, A. 2015. Authorship Profiling in a Forensic Context. PhD dissertation. Aston University, Birmingham, UK.
Pavlenko, A. (2008). Non-Native Speakers of English and the Miranda Warnings. TESOL Quarterly, 42(1), 1–30.
Rock, F. (2012). The Caution in England and Wales. In L. Solan & P. Tiersma (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Language and Law (pp. 312–325). Oxford: Oxford Press.
Searle, J. (1969). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tiersma, P. (2001). Textualising the Law. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 8(2), 73–92.
Wright, D. (2013). Stylistic Variation Within Genre Conventions in the Enron Email Corpus: Develo** a Text-Sensitive METHODOLOGY for Authorship Research. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 20(1), 45–75.
Wright, D. (2017). Using Word N-Grams to Identify Authors and Idiolects: A Corpus Approach to a Forensic Linguistic Problem. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 22(2), 212–241.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
MacLeod, N., Grant, T. (2021). Assuming Identities Online: How Linguistics Is Hel** the Policing of Online Grooming and the Distribution of Abusive Images. In: Owen, T., Marshall, J. (eds) Rethinking Cybercrime. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55841-3_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55841-3_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-55840-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-55841-3
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)