Abstract
The process, justified by theory and physical modeling, enables to establish dependence of poroperm properties of loose geomaterials versus fluid pressure and stresses. The laboratory unit designed and manufactured by researchers, comprises a measurement cell filled with a loose material, a hydraulic press, and a recorder of pressure, flow rate, and stress \( \sigma_{m} \), stepwise applied to the cell. At each loading stage the permeability test was carried out at different input gas pressures \( p_{n} \). The stationary measured flowrate data \( Q_{mn} \) and the back analysis were employed to establish the empirical permeability–effective stress dependence, followed with approximation by two-parameter exponential function. The measurement cell was vacuumized at fixed \( \sigma_{m} \) the cell was connected to a vessel, filled with air of a preset mass. Porosity \( \varphi_{m} \) was calculated based on the equilibrium pressure gained in “cell–vessel” system. The experiments performed with the medium-grained sand revealed that the exponent factor characterizing the relationship between permeability and effective stress is something like 0.02 bar−1; the permeability–porosity relation can be described by a power function; thereto, Kozeny–Carman equation is fulfilled with good precision as well.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahmed TH (2019) Reservoir engineering handbook, 5th edn. Gulf Professional Publishing, Oxford, United Kingdom
Alyamani MS, Sen Z (1993) Determination of hydraulic conductivity from grain-size distribution curves. Ground Water 31:551–555
Carrier WD, Goodbye H, Hello K-C (2003) J Geotechn Geoenvironmental Eng 129(11):1054–1056
Chapuis RP (2004) Predicting the saturated hydraulic conductivity of sand and gravel using effective diameter and void ratio. Can Geotech J 41:787–795
Chapuis RP, Gill DE, Baass K (1989) Laboratory permeability tests on sand: influence of the compaction method on anisotropy. Can Geotech J 26(4):614–622
Dake LP (2001) The practice of reservoir engineering. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Ebinuma T, Kamata Y, Minagawa H (2005) Mechanical properties of sandy sediment containing methane hydrate. In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on gas hydrates, vol 2. Trondheim, pp. 907–910
Gurova TI, Chernova LS, Potlova MM (1988) Lithology and conditions for formation of oil and gas reservoirs of the Siberian platform. Nedra, Moscow
Holt RM (1990) Permeability reduction induced by a nonhydrostatic stress field. SPE Formation Eval 5:444–448
Hsu CS, Robinson PR (2019) Petroleum science and technology. Springer, New York
Istomin VA, Yakushev VS (1992) Gas hydrates in natural conditions. Nedra, Moscow
Kochin NE, Kibel IA, Roze NV (1964) Theoretical hydromechanics. Wiley, Chichester
Nazarov LA, Nazarova LA, Karchevskii AL, Panov AV (2013) Estimation of stresses and deformation properties in rock mass based on inverse problem solution using measurement data of free boundary displacement. J Appl Ind Math 7(2):234–240
Nazarova LA, Nazarov LA (2016) Evolution of stresses and permeability of fractured-and-porous rock mass around a production well. J Min Sci 52(3):424–431
Nazarova LA, Nazarov LA, Epov MI, Eltsov IN (2013) Evolution of geomechanical and electro-hydrodynamic fields in deep well drilling in rocks. J Min Sci 49(5):704–714
Nazarova LA, Nazarov LA, Shkuratnik VL, Protasov MI, Nikolenko PV (2017) An acoustic approach to the estimation of rock mass state and prediction of induced seismicity parameters: theory, laboratory experiments, and case study. In: ISRM AfriRock—rock mechanics for Africa. Cape Town, South Africa, pp 593–604
Patino H, Martinez E, Gonzalez J, Soriano A (2019) Permeability of mine tailings measured in triaxial cell. Can Geotech J 56(4):587–599
Ranaivomanana H, Razakamanantsoa A, Amiri O (2017) Permeability prediction of soils including degree of compaction and microstructure. J Geomech 17(4):1–11
Roi R, Paredes X, Holtzman R (2018) Reactive transport under stress: permeability evolution in deformable porous media. Earth and Planet Sci Lett 493:198–207
Ryzhov AY (2011) Structural features of reservoir rock voids in Botuobinskiy horizon of Chayandinskoye field. Oil and Gas Geology 4:49–55
Ryzhov AY, Savchenko NV, Perunova TA, Orlov DM (2010) Influence of Chayan-dinskoye oil and gas condensate field reservoir pore space peculiarities on their filtration properties. In: Theses of II international scientific and practical conference “world gas resources and reserves, and prospective technologies of their Development”. Moscow, p 62
Sathananthan I, Indraratna B (2006) Laboratory evaluation of smear zone and correlation between permeability and moisture content. J Geotechn Geoenvironmental Eng 132(7):942–945
Sezer A, Goktepe AB, Altun S (2009) Estimation of the permeability of granular soils using neuro-fuzzy system. In: Proceedings of conference on artificial intelligence applications and innovations (AIAI-2009). Thessaloniki, Greece, pp 333–342
Sinaiski EG (2011) Hydromechanics: theory and fundamentals. Wiley, Chichester
Terry RE, Rogers JB (2014) Applied petroleum reservoir engineering, 3rd edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, USA
Vukovic M, Soro A (1992) Determination of hydraulic conductivity of porous media from grain-size composition. Water Res Publ, USA
Yeltsov IN, Nazarov LA, Nazarova LA, Nesterova GV, Epov MI (2012) Logging interpretation taking into account hydrodynamical and geomechanical processes in an invaded zone. Dokl Earth Sci 445(2):1021–1024
Yeltsov IN, Nesterova GV, Sobolev AY, Epov MI, Nazarova LA, Nazarov LA (2014) Geomechanics and fluid flow effects on electric well logs: multiphysics modeling. Russ Geol Geophys 55(5–6):775–783
Zhang L, Aziz N, Ren T, Nemcik J, Wang Z (2012) Permeability testing of coal under different triaxial conditions. In: Proceedings of the 12th coal operators’ conference, University of Wollongong and The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, pp 277–285
Zoback MD, Nur A (1975) Permeability and effective stress. Bull Am Assoc Pet Geol 59:154–158
Acknowledgements
The work was partially supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research: Project No. 18-05-00830 and Program of Federal Scientific Investigations (Identification Number AAAA-A17-117122090002-5).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nazarov, L., Nazarova, L., Bruel, D., Golikov, N. (2021). Determination of Permeability–Porosity–Stresses Dependence for Loose Media Based on Inverse Problem Solution by Lab Test Data. In: Chaplina, T. (eds) Processes in GeoMedia - Volume II. Springer Geology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53521-6_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53521-6_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-53520-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-53521-6
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)