Determination of Permeability–Porosity–Stresses Dependence for Loose Media Based on Inverse Problem Solution by Lab Test Data

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Processes in GeoMedia - Volume II

Abstract

The process, justified by theory and physical modeling, enables to establish dependence of poroperm properties of loose geomaterials versus fluid pressure and stresses. The laboratory unit designed and manufactured by researchers, comprises a measurement cell filled with a loose material, a hydraulic press, and a recorder of pressure, flow rate, and stress \( \sigma_{m} \), stepwise applied to the cell. At each loading stage the permeability test was carried out at different input gas pressures \( p_{n} \). The stationary measured flowrate data \( Q_{mn} \) and the back analysis were employed to establish the empirical permeability–effective stress dependence, followed with approximation by two-parameter exponential function. The measurement cell was vacuumized at fixed \( \sigma_{m} \) the cell was connected to a vessel, filled with air of a preset mass. Porosity \( \varphi_{m} \) was calculated based on the equilibrium pressure gained in “cell–vessel” system. The experiments performed with the medium-grained sand revealed that the exponent factor characterizing the relationship between permeability and effective stress is something like 0.02 bar−1; the permeability–porosity relation can be described by a power function; thereto, Kozeny–Carman equation is fulfilled with good precision as well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 96.29
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
EUR 128.39
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
EUR 128.39
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmed TH (2019) Reservoir engineering handbook, 5th edn. Gulf Professional Publishing, Oxford, United Kingdom

    Google Scholar 

  • Alyamani MS, Sen Z (1993) Determination of hydraulic conductivity from grain-size distribution curves. Ground Water 31:551–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrier WD, Goodbye H, Hello K-C (2003) J Geotechn Geoenvironmental Eng 129(11):1054–1056

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapuis RP (2004) Predicting the saturated hydraulic conductivity of sand and gravel using effective diameter and void ratio. Can Geotech J 41:787–795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapuis RP, Gill DE, Baass K (1989) Laboratory permeability tests on sand: influence of the compaction method on anisotropy. Can Geotech J 26(4):614–622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dake LP (2001) The practice of reservoir engineering. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebinuma T, Kamata Y, Minagawa H (2005) Mechanical properties of sandy sediment containing methane hydrate. In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on gas hydrates, vol 2. Trondheim, pp. 907–910

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurova TI, Chernova LS, Potlova MM (1988) Lithology and conditions for formation of oil and gas reservoirs of the Siberian platform. Nedra, Moscow

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt RM (1990) Permeability reduction induced by a nonhydrostatic stress field. SPE Formation Eval 5:444–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu CS, Robinson PR (2019) Petroleum science and technology. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Istomin VA, Yakushev VS (1992) Gas hydrates in natural conditions. Nedra, Moscow

    Google Scholar 

  • Kochin NE, Kibel IA, Roze NV (1964) Theoretical hydromechanics. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Nazarov LA, Nazarova LA, Karchevskii AL, Panov AV (2013) Estimation of stresses and deformation properties in rock mass based on inverse problem solution using measurement data of free boundary displacement. J Appl Ind Math 7(2):234–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nazarova LA, Nazarov LA (2016) Evolution of stresses and permeability of fractured-and-porous rock mass around a production well. J Min Sci 52(3):424–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nazarova LA, Nazarov LA, Epov MI, Eltsov IN (2013) Evolution of geomechanical and electro-hydrodynamic fields in deep well drilling in rocks. J Min Sci 49(5):704–714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nazarova LA, Nazarov LA, Shkuratnik VL, Protasov MI, Nikolenko PV (2017) An acoustic approach to the estimation of rock mass state and prediction of induced seismicity parameters: theory, laboratory experiments, and case study. In: ISRM AfriRock—rock mechanics for Africa. Cape Town, South Africa, pp 593–604

    Google Scholar 

  • Patino H, Martinez E, Gonzalez J, Soriano A (2019) Permeability of mine tailings measured in triaxial cell. Can Geotech J 56(4):587–599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranaivomanana H, Razakamanantsoa A, Amiri O (2017) Permeability prediction of soils including degree of compaction and microstructure. J Geomech 17(4):1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Roi R, Paredes X, Holtzman R (2018) Reactive transport under stress: permeability evolution in deformable porous media. Earth and Planet Sci Lett 493:198–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryzhov AY (2011) Structural features of reservoir rock voids in Botuobinskiy horizon of Chayandinskoye field. Oil and Gas Geology 4:49–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryzhov AY, Savchenko NV, Perunova TA, Orlov DM (2010) Influence of Chayan-dinskoye oil and gas condensate field reservoir pore space peculiarities on their filtration properties. In: Theses of II international scientific and practical conference “world gas resources and reserves, and prospective technologies of their Development”. Moscow, p 62

    Google Scholar 

  • Sathananthan I, Indraratna B (2006) Laboratory evaluation of smear zone and correlation between permeability and moisture content. J Geotechn Geoenvironmental Eng 132(7):942–945

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sezer A, Goktepe AB, Altun S (2009) Estimation of the permeability of granular soils using neuro-fuzzy system. In: Proceedings of conference on artificial intelligence applications and innovations (AIAI-2009). Thessaloniki, Greece, pp 333–342

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinaiski EG (2011) Hydromechanics: theory and fundamentals. Wiley, Chichester

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Terry RE, Rogers JB (2014) Applied petroleum reservoir engineering, 3rd edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Vukovic M, Soro A (1992) Determination of hydraulic conductivity of porous media from grain-size composition. Water Res Publ, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeltsov IN, Nazarov LA, Nazarova LA, Nesterova GV, Epov MI (2012) Logging interpretation taking into account hydrodynamical and geomechanical processes in an invaded zone. Dokl Earth Sci 445(2):1021–1024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeltsov IN, Nesterova GV, Sobolev AY, Epov MI, Nazarova LA, Nazarov LA (2014) Geomechanics and fluid flow effects on electric well logs: multiphysics modeling. Russ Geol Geophys 55(5–6):775–783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, Aziz N, Ren T, Nemcik J, Wang Z (2012) Permeability testing of coal under different triaxial conditions. In: Proceedings of the 12th coal operators’ conference, University of Wollongong and The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, pp 277–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Zoback MD, Nur A (1975) Permeability and effective stress. Bull Am Assoc Pet Geol 59:154–158

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work was partially supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research: Project No. 18-05-00830 and Program of Federal Scientific Investigations (Identification Number AAAA-A17-117122090002-5).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leonid Nazarov .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Nazarov, L., Nazarova, L., Bruel, D., Golikov, N. (2021). Determination of Permeability–Porosity–Stresses Dependence for Loose Media Based on Inverse Problem Solution by Lab Test Data. In: Chaplina, T. (eds) Processes in GeoMedia - Volume II. Springer Geology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53521-6_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation