Revisiting Blockhain Use in Notary Services: An European Perspective

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Blockchain and Applications (BLOCKCHAIN 2020)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1238))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Notary services have long been identified as a recurrent example for dematerialisation through blockchain adoption, but has failed to become a world wide reality. The key issue being the distinct legal frameworks throughout the world. Europe in this context has a more restrictive legal context with regard to blockchain use. In this work, we briefly discuss the European role of the Notary, review the existing European solutions and identify related open issues that are not resolved in the existing solutions.

A. Pinto—This work is partially financed by National Funds through the Portuguese funding agency, FCT - Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, within project UIDB/50014/2020.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 117.69
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
EUR 160.49
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Obtained from https://www.blockchain.com/pools in 30 of July of 2019.

References

  1. Atzori, M.: Blockchain technology and decentralized governance: is the state still necessary? J. Govern. Regul. (2017). https://doi.org/10.22495/jgr-v6-i1-p5

  2. Barbieri, M., Gassen, D.: Blockchain - can this new technology really revolutionize the land registry system. In: Land and Poverty World Bank Conference 2017: Responsible Land Governance (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bellia, M., et al.: Blockchain now and tomorrow - Assessing multidimensional impacts of distributed ledger technologies. Technical report, Joint Research Centre (European Commission) (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bracciali, A.: Italia il primo Paese a riconoscere validità giuridica della notarizzazione attraverso le DLT e gli Smart Contract? (2019). http://www.ilblogdellestelle.it/2019/02/italia-il-primo-paese-a-riconoscere-validitagiuridica-della-notarizzazione-attraverso-le-dlt-e-gli-smart-contract.html. Accessed 28 Jan 2020

  5. Crosby, M., et al.: Blockchain technology: Beyond bitcoin. In: Applied Innovation 2.6-10, p. 71 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  6. De La Rosa, J., Gibociv, D.: A survey of blockchain technologies for open innovation. In: EasyChair Preprint 830 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dumortier, J.: Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 on electronic identification and trust services for electronic transactions in the internal market (eIDAS Regulation). In: EU Regulation of E-Commerce. Edward Elgar Publishing (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  8. DuPont, Q., Maurer, B.: Ledgers and law in the blockchain. Kings Review 23 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Feng, Q., et al.: A survey on privacy protection in blockchain system. J. Network Comput. Appl. 126, 45–58 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lemieux, V.: Blockchain and distributed ledgers as trusted recordkee** systems: an archival theoretic evaluation framework, November 2017

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lin, I.C., Liao, T.-C.: A survey of blockchain security issues and challenges. IJ Network Secur. 19(5), 653–659 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Locher, T., Obermeier, S., Pignolet, Y.A.: When can a distributed ledger replace a trusted third party? In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Internet of Things (iThings) and IEEE Green Computing and Communications (GreenCom) and IEEE Cyber, Physical and Social Computing (CPSCom) and IEEE Smart Data (SmartData), pp. 1069–1077. IEEE (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Di Francesco Maesa, D., Mori, P.: Blockchain 3.0 applications survey. J. Parallel Distrib. Comput. 138, 99–114 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpdc.2019.12.019. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0743731519308664. ISSN 0743-7315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Nakamoto, S.: Bitcoin: a peer-to-peer electronic cash system (2008). http://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf

  15. Notaries of Europe: Italian notariat launches first notarial blockchain: “NotarChain”. Notaries of Europe (2017). http://www.2017.notariesofeuropereport.eu/en/corner/italy-italian-notariat-launches-rst-notarial-blockchain-notarchain. Accessed 28 Jan 2020

  16. Rocha, J.: Manual Teórico e Prático do Notariado. Edições Almedina (2003). ISBN 9789724015637

    Google Scholar 

  17. Salmeling, M., Fransson, C.: The land registry in the Blockchain - Testbed. A development project with Lantmäteriet, Landshypotek Bank, SBAB, Telia company, ChromaWay and Kairos Future (2017). http://chromaway.com/papers/lockchain LandregistryReport2017.pdf

  18. Republic of Slovenia: Slovenia launches national test blockchain infrastructure and Slovenian Blockchain partnership (2019). www.gov.si/en/news/slovenia-launches-national-test-blockchain-infrastructure-andslovenian-blockchain-partnership. Accessed 28 Jan 2020

  19. Swan, M.: Blockchain: Blueprint for a New Economy. O’Reilly Media Inc., Sebastopol (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Telindus: Luxembourg Notary Blockchain Kickoff – A first in Europe (2019). www.telindus.lu/en/blog/solutions-nance/luxembourg-notaryblockchain-kicko-rst-europe. Accessed 28 Jan 2020

  21. Underwood, S.: Blockchain beyond Bitcoin. Commun. ACM 59, 15–17 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/2994581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wüst, K., Gervais, A.: Do you need a Blockchain? In: 2018 Crypto Valley Conference on Blockchain Technology (CVCBT), pp. 45–54. IEEE (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Young, J.: Factom stalls honduras land title registry initiative (2019). www.newsbtc.com/2015/12/26/factom-stalls-honduras-land- titleregistry-initiative/. Accessed 28 Jan 2020

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to António Pinto .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Pinto, A., Silva, J. (2020). Revisiting Blockhain Use in Notary Services: An European Perspective. In: Prieto, J., Pinto, A., Das, A., Ferretti, S. (eds) Blockchain and Applications. BLOCKCHAIN 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1238. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52535-4_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation