An Assessment of Factors Influencing Collaboration Impacts on Organisational Performance: A Review

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Collaboration and Integration in Construction, Engineering, Management and Technology

Abstract

Poor organisational performance is partly attributed to lack of collaboration within an organisation. Therefore, this paper sought to establish the factors that influence collaboration and the impact of collaboration on organisational performance. A literature review was conducted to achieve the objectives of the study. Literature from Google Scholar, Emerald and Science Direct were used, based on the keywords relevant to the study. The materials consulted included journals and conference proceedings. Thematic content analysis was used to identify factors that influence collaboration in an organisation. The findings revealed that collaborative leadership, collaborative culture, attributes of partners, strategic and external environment factors influence collaboration. Further findings revealed that collaboration could influence an organisation’s performance in terms of knowledge creation and transfer, innovativeness, ability to leverage resources to achieve maximum benefits, as well as competitive advantage. This study provides knowledge on factors that influence collaboration in order to devise strategies to improve the quality or extent of collaboration in an organisation. By understanding the factors of collaboration, which in turn influence organisational performance, strategies can be developed by stakeholders and managers to encourage collaboration and thus performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 287.83
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
EUR 374.49
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
EUR 374.49
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baloyi, L., & Bekker, M. C. (2011). Causes of construction cost and time overruns: The 2010 FIFA World Cup stadia in South Africa, Acta Structilia, p. 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boaz, A., Hanney, S., Borst, R., O’Shea, A., & Kok, M. (2018). How to engage stakeholders in research: Design principles to support improvement. Health Research Policy and Systems, 16(1), 60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bresnen, M., & Marshall, N. (2000). Building partnerships: Case studies of client-contractor collaboration in the UK construction industry. Construction Management and Economics, 18(7), 819–832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bullinger, A. C., Rass, M., Adamczyk, S., Moeslein, K. M., & Sohn, S. (2012). Open innovation in health care: Analysis of an open health platform. Health Policy, 105, 165–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buse, K., & Harmer, A. M. (2007). Seven habits of highly effective global public–private health partnerships: Practice and potential. Social Science and Medicine, 64, 259–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, A., Chan, D., & Ho, K. (2003). An empirical study of the benefits of construction partnering in Hong Kong. Construction Management and Economics, 21(5), 523–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choo, C. W., Detlor, B., & Turnbull, D. (2000). Web work: Information seeking and knowledge management on the World Wide Web. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Colombo, G., Dell’Era, C., & Frattini, F. (2011). New product development (NPD) service suppliers in open innovation practices: Processes and organization for knowledge exchange and integration. International Journal of Innovation Management, 15, 165–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daft, R. L. (2001). Organization theory and design. St. Paul: West.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson, P. E. (2008). Procurement effects on coopetition in client-contractor relationships. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 134(2), 103–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feller, J., Finnegan, P., Hayes, J., & O’Reilly, P. (2009). Institutionalising information asymmetry: Governance structures for open innovation. Information Technology & People, 22, 297–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feller, J., Finnegan, P., & Nilsson, O. (2011). Open innovation and public administration: Transformational typologies and business model impacts. European Journal of Information Systems, 20, 358–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, R., Nohria, N., & Akbar, Z. (2000). Strategic networks. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 199–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, C., Phillips, N., & Lawrence, T. B. (2003). Resources, knowledge and influence: The organizational effects of interorganizational collaboration. Journal of Management Studies, 40(2), 321–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauswirth, D. B., Hoffman, D. M., Kane, J. F., Ozubu, I. L., Wong, C. L., & Wong, P. W. (2004). Collaborative leadership: Success stories in transportation mega projects. A “lessons learned” approach to collaborative leadership in mega project management. Washington, DC: University of Maryland University College and US Department of Transportation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurley, T. J. (2011). Collaborative Leadership: Engaging Collective Intelligence to Achieve Results across Organizational Boundaries. White paper, Oxford Leadership Academy: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hussin, J. M., Rahman, I. A., & Memon, A. H. (2013). The way forward in sustainable construction: Issues and challenges. International Journal of Advances in Applied Sciences (IJAAS) 31–42. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijaas.v2i1.1321.

  • Isikdag, U., & Underwood, J. (2010). Two design patterns for facilitating building information model-based synchronous collaboration. Automation in Construction, 19, 544–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai, E. R. (2011). Collaboration: A literature review. Pearson Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S., Park, G., Yoon, B., & Park, J. (2010). Open innovation in SMEs—An intermediated network model. Research Policy, 39, 290–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenthaler, U. (2009). Outbound open innovation and its effect on firm performance: Examining environmental influences. R&D Management, 39, 317–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McEwan, D., Ruissen, G. R., Eys, M. A., Zumbo, B. D., & Beauchamp, M. R. (2017). The effectiveness of teamwork training on teamwork behaviors and team performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled interventions. PLoS One, 12(1), e0169604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohammadi, M., Yeganeh, E. M., & Rad, T. D. (2010). The relationship between faculty members’ perception of organizational culture types and their preferences for instruction and counseling in Iranian college of education and psychology. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 5, 1841–1848.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakagaki, P., Aber, J., Fetterhoff, T. (2006). The challenges in implementing open innovation in a global innovation-driven corporation. Research-Technology Management, 55, 32–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naoum, S. (2003). An overview into the concept of partnering. International Journal of Project Management, 21(1), 71–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reeves, S., Xyrichis, A., & Zwarenstein, M. (2018). Teamwork, collaboration, coordination, and networking: Why we need to distinguish between different types of interprofessional practice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rezgui, Y., Hopfe, C. J., & Vorakulpipat, C. (2010). Generations of knowledge management in the architecture, engineering and construction industry: An evolutionary perspective. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 24(2), 219–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruan, X., Ochieng, E. G., Price, A. D. F., & Egbu, C. O. (2012). Knowledge integration process in construction projects: A social network analysis approach to compare competitive and collaborative working. Construction Management and Economics, 30(1), 5–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiele, H. (2012). Accessing supplier innovation by being their preferred customer. Research-Technology Management, 55, 44–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherer, S. A. (2003). Critical success factors for manufacturing networks as perceived by network coordinators. Journal of Small Business Management, 41, 325–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staykova, G., & Underwood, J. (2017). Assessing collaborative performance on construction projects through knowledge exchange: A UK rail strategic alliance case study. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(6), 968–987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Subramaniam, M. M., Ahn, J., Fleischmann, K. R., & Druin, A. (2012). Reimagining the role of school libraries in STEM education: Creating hybrid spaces for exploration. The Library Quarterly, 82(2), 161–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tshuma, B., Steyn, H., & Van Waveren, C. (2018). The role played by PMOs in the transfer of knowledge between projects: A conceptual framework. South African Journal of Industrial Engineering, 29(2), 127–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Vrande, V., De Jong, J.P., Vanhaverbeke, W., De Rochemont, M. (2009). Open innovation in SMEs: Trends, motives and management challenges. Technovation, 29, 423–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vangen, S., & Huxham, C. (2003). Nurturing collaborative relations: Building trust in interorganizational collaboration. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 39(1), 5–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westergren, U. H. (2011). Opening up innovation: The impact of contextual factors on the co-creation of IT-enabled value adding services within the manufacturing industry. Information Systems and e-Business Management, 9, 223–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, M., & Chen, Y. H. (2014). A factor analysis on teamwork performance: An empirical study of inter-instituted collaboration. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 55, 37–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zwikael, O., Elias, A. A., & Ahn, M. J. (2012). Stakeholder collaboration and engagement in virtual projects. International Journal of Networking and Virtual Organisations, 10(2), 117–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chioma Sylvia Okoro .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sepuru, M., Musonda, I., Okoro, C.S. (2021). An Assessment of Factors Influencing Collaboration Impacts on Organisational Performance: A Review. In: Ahmed, S.M., Hampton, P., Azhar, S., D. Saul, A. (eds) Collaboration and Integration in Construction, Engineering, Management and Technology. Advances in Science, Technology & Innovation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48465-1_54

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation