Abstract
Facial asymmetries can manifest in all thirds of the face and in all planes (sagittal, transverse, and vertical). Significant asymmetry in adolescence and adults can result in esthetic as well as functional consequences such as malocclusion, nasal airway impairment, and temporomandibular joint dysfunction (TMD). In infants and children, asymmetry may also involve the cranial base, forehead, orbits, and neurological consequences. Etiologies may include congenital or developmental deformities, trauma, overgrowth, resorption of condyles, tumors, dysplasia, etc. Comprehensive diagnoses include etiology, age of onset, involved structures (hard and soft tissues), and degree of deformity, progressive or static, etc. Using appropriate diagnostic methods including clinical, imaging, lab tests, etc. will provide a detailed diagnosis and treatment approach to provide optimal treatment outcomes. This chapter focuses on the diagnostics as well as the planning and surgical techniques to correct asymmetries of the facial skeletal structures.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Proffit WR, Turvey TA. Dentofacial asymmetry in profit. In: White RP, Savere DM, editors. Contemporary treatment of dentofacial deformity. St. Louis: Mosley; 2003.
Severt TR, Proffit WR. The prevalence of facial asymmetry in the dentofacial deformities population at the University of North Carolina. Int J Adult Orthodontics Orthodontic Surg. 1997;12:171–6.
Al Sharif AA, et al. Standardization of quantitative single photon emission, computed tomography in control individuals and in patients with condyle hyperplasia. Nu Med Commun. 2014;35(12):1268–76.
Obwegeser HC, Makek MS. Hemimandibular hyperplasia and hemimandibular elongation. J Maxillofac Surg. 1986;14:183.
Obwegeser HL. Mandibular growth anomalies. Berlin: Springer; 2001.
Gateno J, **a JI, Techgraeber JF, et al. Clinical feasibility of computer aided surgical simulation (CASS) in the treatment of complex cranio-maxillofacial deformities. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;65:728–34.
Swennen GR, Malhaous W, Schutyser F. Three dimensional treatment planning of orthognathic surgery with area of virtual imaging. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;67:2080–92.
Sailer HF, et al. The value of stereolithographic models for preoperative diagnosis of craniofacial deformities and planning of surgical corrections. Int J Oral Maxillofacial Surg. 1998;27:327–33.
Ghawai S, Aagaard E, Thygesen TH. High condylectomy for the treatment of mandibular condylar hyperplasia: a systemic review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016;45:60–71.
Wolford LM, Mehra P. Efficacy of high condylectomy for management of condylar hyperplasia. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2002;121:136–50, discussion 150–151.
Brusati R, Pedrazzole M, Colletti G. Functional results after condylectomy in active laterognathia. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2010;38:179–84.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Turvey, T.A., McGraw, C.B.L. (2024). Skeletal Corrections of Facial Asymmetry. In: Mehra, P., Wolford, L.M. (eds) Management of Facial Asymmetry. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44971-1_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44971-1_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-44970-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-44971-1
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)