Nature-Based Solutions for Agricultural Water Management

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Climate Resilient Societies

Abstract

Nature-based solutions (NBS) for water management and food security constitute a new paradigm that uses or mimics ecosystem services to enhance water quality and quantity for agricultural production, while preserving the integrity of ecosystems. Yet, regenerative processes that maintain ecosystems’ quality require ample time and large areas that are shared with multiple stakeholders, many of which have opposing and, sometimes, incompatible interests. Reconciling these conflicting objectives requires a coherent set of principles for NBS interventions that should be based on valuation of the natural resource base and a multidisciplinary approach that uses case-specific knowledge on problem solving. A survey of 21 case studies shows that a platform of multi-stakeholders with an active transdisciplinary approach and sustainable funding mechanisms has important elements for successful NBS implementation. Rewards for ecosystem services delivered to custodians is promising, but still in its infancy; valuation of ecosystem services or ecosystems as an entity is technically cumbersome and hardly applied in practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
GBP 19.95
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
GBP 449.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
GBP 549.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blesh, J. M., & Barrett, G. W. (2006). Farmers’ attitudes regarding agrolandscape ecology: A regional comparison. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 28(3), 121–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bossio, D., NobleMolden, A. D., & Nangia, V. (2008). Land degradation and water productivity in agricultural landscapes. In B. Bossio & K. Geheb (Eds.), Conserving land, protecting water (pp. 20–32). CAB International.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Burek, P., Satoh, Y., Fischer, G., Kahil, M. T., Scherzer, A., Tramberend, S., Nava, L. F., Wada, Y., Eisner, S., Flörke, M., Hanasaki, N., Magnuszewski, P., Cosgrove, B., & Wiberg, D. (2016). Water futures and solution – fast track initiative (Final report. IIASA working paper). Laxenburg: IIASA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coates, D., Pert, P. L., Barron, J., Muthuri, C., Nguyen-Khoa, S., Boelee, E., & Jarvis, D. I. (2013). Water-related ecosystem services and food security. In E. Boelee (Ed.), Managing water and agroecosystems for food security (pp. 29–41). CABI.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Coates, D., Uhlenbook, S., & Connor, E. (2018). Nature-based solutions work everywhere, including Africa. www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/SC/images/NBS_for_Africa_website.pdf

  • Dieguez, H., & Paruelo, J. M. (2017). Disentangling the signal of climatic fluctuations from land use: Changes in ecosystem functioning in South American protected areas (1982–2012). Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation, 3, 177–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eggermont, H., Estelle, B., Azevedo, J. M. N., Beumer, V., Brodin, T., Claudet, J., Fady, B., Grube, M., Keune, H., Lamarque, P., Reuter, K., Smith, M., Van Ham, C., Weisser, W. W., & Le Roux, X. (2015). Nature-based solutions: New influence for environmental management and research in Europe. Gaia, 24(4), 243–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ESPA. (2018). An environment for well-being: Pathways out of poverty – Policy messages from the ESPA programme (Executive summary). Edinburgh: Ecosystem Services for Poverty Alleviation.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO. (2011). Payments for ecosystem services and food security. http://www.fao.org/docrep/014/i2100e/i2100e00.htm

  • FAO. (2017). The future of food and agriculture – Trends and challenges. Rome: FAO.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO/GIAHS. (2018a). Traditional Wasabi cultivation in Shizuoka, Japan. [Cited March 24, 2018.] http://www.fao.org/giahs/giahsaroundtheworld/designated-sites/asia-and-the-pacific/traditional-wasabi-cultivation-in-shizuoka-japan/detailed-information/en/

  • FAO/GIAHS. (2018b). Globally important agricultural heritage systems. [Cited March 20, 2018]. http://www.fao.org/giahs/en/

  • Finlayson, M., Bunting, S. W., Beveridge, M., Tharme, R. E., & Nguyen-Khoa, S. (2013). Wetlands. In E. Boelee (Ed.), Managing water and agroecosystems for food security (pp. 82–103). CABI.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Greenhalgh, S., Samarasinghe, O., Curran-Cournane, F., Wright, W., & Brown, P. (2017). Using ecosystem services to underpin cost–benefit analysis: Is it a way to protect finite soil resources? Ecosystem Services, 27, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo, Z., **ao, X., & Li, D. (2000). An assessment of ecosystem services: Water flow regulation and hydroelectric power production. Ecological Applications, 10(3), 925–936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162, 1243–1248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IUCN. (2012). The IUCN Programme 2013–2016. Retrieved 7 October 2015, from http://cmsdata.iucn.org/downloads/iucn_programme_2013_2016.pdf

  • Jax, K., Furman, E., Saarikoski, H., Barton, D. N., Delbaere, B., Dick, J., Duke, G., Görg, C., GĂłmez-Baggethun, E., Harrison, P. A., Maes, J., PĂ©rez-Soba, M., Saarela, S., Turkelboom, F., van Dijk, J., & Watt, A. D. (2018). Handling a messy world: Lessons learned when trying to make the ecosystem services concept operational. Ecosystems Services, 29, 415–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalas, P., Abubakar, A., Chavva, K., Gordes, A., Grovermann, C., Innes-Taylor, N., Ketelaar, J., Laval, E., Phillips, S., & Rioux, J. (2017). Multi-stakeholder, multi-actor processes, platforms and networks for Climate Smart Agriculture. In Enhancing capacities for a country-owned transition towards Climate Smart Agriculture. Climate-Smart Agriculture.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, K., Dudley, N., & Sandwith, T. (2011). Natural solutions: Protected areas hel** people to cope with climate change. Oryx, 45(4), 461–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mander, M., Jewitt, G., Dini, J., Glenday, J., Blignaut, J., Hughes, C., Marais, C., Maze, K., Van der Waal, B., & Mills, A. (2017). Modelling potential hydrological returns from investing in ecological infrastructure: Case studies from the Baviaanskloof-Tsitsikamma and uMngeni catchments, South Africa. Ecosystem Services. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.03.003.

  • Mattsson, B. J., Fischborn, M., Brunson, M., & Vacik, H. (2019). Introducing and evaluating a knowledge transfer approach to support problem solving in and around protected areas. Ambio, 48, 13–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NCE. (2016). The sustainable infrastructure imperative: Financing for better growth and development. The 2016 new climate economy report- The global commission on the Economy and Climate. https://newclimateeconomy.report

  • Nesshöver, C., Assmuth, T., Irvine, K. N., Rusch, G. M., Waylen, K. A., Delbaere, B., Haase, D., Jones-Walters, L., Keune, H., Kovacs, E., Krauze, K., KĂĽlvik, M., Rey, F., Van Dijk, J., Vistad, O. I., Wilkinson, M. E., & Wittmer, H. (2017). The science, policy and practice of nature-based solutions: An interdisciplinary perspective. The Science of the Total Environment, 579, 1215–1227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, D. W., & Turner, R. K. (1990). Economics of natural resources and the environment. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonneveld, B. G. J. S., Merbis, M. D., Amani, A., Ăśnver, O., & Arnal, M. F. (2018). Nature-based solutions for agricultural water management and food security (FAO land and water discussion paper 12). Rome: FAO.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. (2018). The United Nations world water development report 2018: Nature-based solutions for water. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, N. K., et al. (2018). Integrating fast and slow processes is essential for simulating human–freshwater interactions. Ambio. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-018-1136-6.

  • WWAP (United Nations World Water Assessment Programme)/UN-Water. (2018). The United Nations world water development report 2018: Nature-based solutions for water. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Sonneveld, B.G.J.S., Amani, A., Merbis, M.D. (2021). Nature-Based Solutions for Agricultural Water Management. In: Brears, R.C. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Climate Resilient Societies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42462-6_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation