Abstract
Toleration plays a central role in debates about the accommodation of religious beliefs and practices in liberal democracies. This chapter addresses one such debate, which concerns whether liberal societies ought to tolerate discriminatory practices when, or even because, they are performed by religious associations and institutions. After briefly discussing some recently canvassed arguments in support of tolerating discrimination by religious associations, it turns to the question of how political communities might establish the limits to this form of toleration, a question so far neglected by philosophers. One reason why a tolerant state might refuse to allow religious associations to discriminate is to avoid injuring third-parties, a long-established basis for restricting toleration. This “third-party injuries” objection is carefully unpacked, and it is suggested that third-parties might be injured by particular religious accommodations in at least four different ways. Some tentative suggestions are then made about how to establish the significance and relevance of these injuries.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Balint P (2017) Respecting toleration: traditional liberalism and contemporary diversity. Oxford University Press, New York
Bardon A, Ceva E (2018) The ethics of toleration and religious accommodation. In: Lever A, Poama A (eds) The Routledge handbook of ethics and public policy. Abingdon, Routledge
Barry B (2001) Culture and equality: an egalitarian critique of multiculturalism. Polity, Cambridge
Baumeister A (2019) Religion and the claims of citizenship: the dangers of institutional accommodation. In: Seglow J, Shorten A (eds) Religion and political theory. Rowman and Littlefield, New York, pp 99–118
Bou-Habib P (2006) A theory of religious accommodation. J Appl Philos 23(1):109–126
Brettschneider C (2012) When the state speaks, what should it say? Princeton University Press, Princeton
Clayton M, Mason A, Swift A, Wareham R (forthcoming) The political morality of school composition: the case of religious selection. Br J Polit Sci. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123418000649
Cohen AJ (2014) Toleration. Polity, Cambridge
Cohen J (2015) Freedom of religion, Inc: whose sovereignty. Neth J Legal Philos 3:169–210
Corvino J, Anderson RT, Girgis S (2017) Debating religious liberty and discrimination. Oxford University Press, New York
Eidelson B (2015) Discrimination and disrespect. Oxford University Press, New York
Eisgruber CL, Sager LG (2007) Religious freedom and the constitution. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Galeotti AE (2002) Toleration as recognition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Garnett R (2016) The freedom of the church (toward) an exposition, translation and defence. In: Schwartzman M, Flanders C, Robinson Z (eds) The rise of corporate religious liberty. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 39–62
Gowran S (2004) ‘See no evil, speak no evil, hear no evil?’ The experiences of lesbian and gay teachers in Irish schools. In: Deegan J, Devine D, Lodge A (eds) Primary voices: equality, diversity and childhood in Irish primary schools. Institute of Public Administration, Dublin
Gray EM (2013) Coming out as a lesbian, gay or bisexual teacher: negotiating private and professional worlds. Sex Educ 13(6):702–714
Hohfeld W (1919) Fundamental legal conceptions. Yale University Press, New Haven
Horton J (2011) Why the traditional conception of toleration still matters. Crit Rev Int Soc Pol Phil 14(3):289–305
Horwitz P (2009) Churches as first amendment institutions: of sovereignty and spheres. Harv Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Rev 44:79–131
Jones P (1994) Bearing the consequences of belief. J Polit Philos 2(1):24–43
Jones P (2015) Toleration, religion, and accommodation. Eur J Philos 23(3):542–563
Jones P (2020) Toleration, neutrality and exemption. Crit Rev Int Soc Pol Philos 23(2):203–210 https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2019.1609397
Laborde C (2017) Liberalism’s religion. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Laegaard S (2015) Disaggregating corporate freedom of religion. Neth J Legal Philos 44(3):221–230
Laegaard S (2018) Discrimination and religion. In: Lippert-Rasmussen K (ed) The Routledge handbook of the ethics of discrimination. Routledge, Abingdon, pp 207–217
Laycock D (1990) The remnants of free exercise. Supreme Court Rev:1–68
Leiter B (2013) Why tolerate religion? Princeton University Press, Princeton
Lenta P (2016) Freedom of conscience and the value of personal integrity. Ratio Juris 29(2):246–263
Lovett F (2010) A general theory of domination and justice. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Lovett F (2012) What counts as arbitrary power? J Polit Power 5(1):137–152
Macedo S (1998) Transformative constitutionalism and the case of religion: defending the moderate hegemony of liberalism. Political Theory 26(1):56–80
Maclure J, Taylor C (2011) Secularism and Freedom of Conscience. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press
Martin N (2019) Exemption proliferation. In: Seglow J, Shorten A (eds) Religion and political theory. Rowman and Littlefield, New York, pp 81–98
McConnell M (1985) Accommodation of religion. Supreme Court Rev:1–59
Mendus S (1989) Toleration and the limits of liberalism. Palgrave, London
Neary A (2013) Lesbian and gay teachers’ experiences of ‘coming out’ in Irish schools. Br J Sociol Educ 34(4):583–602
Nussbaum M (2008) Liberty of conscience. Basic Books, New York
Parekh B (2000) Rethinking multiculturalism. Palgrave, London
Sagar LG (2017) The puzzle of the Catholic Church. In: Batnitzky L, Dagan H (eds) Institutionalising rights and religion. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Schragger R, Schwartzman M (2013) Against religious institutionalism. Va Law Rev 99(5):917–985
Seglow J (2017) Religious accommodation: responsibility, integrity, and self-respect. In: Bardon A, Laborde C (eds) Religion in liberal political philosophy. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 177–190
Shorten A (2005) Toleration and cultural controversies. Res Publia 11(3):275–299
Shorten A (2015) Are there rights to institutional exemptions? J Soc Philos 46(2):242–263
Shorten A (2017) Accommodating religious institutions: freedom v. domination. Ethnicities 17(2):242–258
Shorten A (2019) May churches discriminate? J Appl Philos 36(5):709–717
Smith SD (2016) The jurisdictional conception of church autonomy. In: Schwartzman M, Flanders C, Robinson Z (eds) The rise of corporate religious liberty. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 19–37
Tebbe N (2017) Religious freedom in an egalitarian age. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Tebbe N, Schwartzman M, Schragger R (2017) How much may religious accommodations burden others? In: Lynch HF et al (eds) Law, religion and health in the United States. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Vallier K (2015) The moral basis of religious exemptions. Law Philos 35(1):1–28
White S (1997) Freedom of association and the right to exclude. J Polit Philos 5(4):373–391
Acknowledgments
Earlier versions of this chapter benefitted from helpful comments from fellow participants at workshops in Konstanz, Leuven, and Irvine, including François Boucher, Nina Hagel, Kathryn Heard, Eszter Kollar, Haimo Li, Nick Martin, Nathaniel Mull, Nashon Perez, Colin Rowe, Micah Schwartzman, Jonathan Seglow, Aristel Skrbic, Antoon Vandevelde, Jens Van ‘T Klooster, Bouke de Vries, and Alexa Zellentin.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Shorten, A. (2022). Toleration and Religious Discrimination. In: Sardoč, M. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Toleration. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42121-2_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42121-2_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-42120-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-42121-2
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences