Abstract
In this chapter, we describe a novel transdisciplinary undergraduate program that is focused on develo** students’ praxis to address problems across disciplinary boundaries and provide a means to interrogate discipline-specific content, epistemologies, and research methodologies they might encounter across those spaces. We argue that undergraduate educators have the potential to inculcate students’ praxis to effect social innovation across disciplinary boundaries by facilitating engagement with three interrelated processes: habits of mind, ways of knowing, and the adoption of a transdisciplinary, content-agnostic skillset. We describe each set of processes, along with core transdisciplinary skills and ways of knowing, building towards a content-agnostic instructional design approach.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ashby, I., Exer, M., & Varner, D. (2020). Develo** cross-cutting competencies for a transdisciplinary world: An extension of Bloom’s Taxonomy. In B. Hokanson et al. (Eds.), Educational technology beyond content: A new focus for learning. Springer.
Ashby, I., Exter, M., Matei, S., & Evans, J. (2016). Lifelong learning starts at school: Competency-based badge systems within the transdisciplinary experience at Purdue Polytechnic. In L. Muilenburg & Z. Berge (Eds.), Digital badges in education: Trends, issues, and cases. New York: Routledge.
Exter, M., Ashby, I., & Caskurlu, S. (2017). Using digital badges in competency-based degree programs. Invited Presentation for ACODE workshop, Melbourne, Australia.
Exter, M., Caskurlu, S., Ashby, I., & Dionne, R. (2016). Designing and assessing competencies in a new transdisciplinary studies in technology program. 2016 International AECT Conference, Las Vegas, NV.
Exter, M., Dionne, R., & Lukasik, C. (2015). Design of a learner-centered seminar-/studio-based polytechnic institute. In B. Hokanson, G. Clinton, & M. Tracey (Eds.), The design of learning experience: Creating the future of educational technology (pp. 139–154). Cham, Switzerland: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16504-2_10
Exter, M. E., Ashby, I., Gray, C. M., Wilder, D., & Krause, T. (2017, June). Systematically integrating liberal education in a transdisciplinary design studio environment. In Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference, Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division. Washington, DC: ASEE. Retrieved from https://peer.asee.org/28901
Freire, P. (1970/2006). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.
Gray, C. M. (2013). Informal peer critique and the negotiation of habitus in a design studio. Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 12(2), 195–209. https://doi.org/10.1386/adch.12.2.195_1
Gray, C. M., El Debs, L. D., Exter, M., & Krause, T. S. (2016, June). Instructional strategies for incorporating empathy in transdisciplinary technology education. In Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference, Engineering Ethics Division. Washington, DC: ASEE. https://doi.org/10.18260/p.25746
Gray, C. M., Exter, M. E., & Krause, T. (2017, June). Moving towards individual competence from group work in transdisciplinary education. In Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference, Design in Engineering Education Division. Washington, DC: ASEE. Retrieved from https://peer.asee.org/28691
Gray, C. M., & Fernandez, T. M. (2018). When world(view)s collide: Contested epistemologies and ontologies in transdisciplinary education. International Journal of Engineering Education, 34(2B), 1–16.
Koskinen, I., Battarbee, K., & Mattelmäki, T. (2003). Empathic design, user experience in product design. Helsinki, Finland: IT Press.
Nelson, H. G., & Stolterman, E. (2012). The design way: Intentional change in an unpredictable world (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Purdue Polytechnic. (2018). Transdisciplinary studies in technology. Retrieved September 7, 2018 from https://polytechnic.purdue.edu/degrees/transdisciplinary-studies-technology
Rogers, Y. (2004). New theoretical approaches for HCI. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 38(1), 87–143.
Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
Thomas, J., & McDonagh, D. (2013). Empathic design: Research strategies. Australasian Medical Journal, 6(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.4066/AMJ.2013.1575
Tracey, M. W., & Hutchinson, A. (2016). Reflection and professional identity development in design education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 28, 263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-016-9380-1
Van Epps, A., Ashby, I., Gray, C. M., & Exter, M. (2016, June). Supporting student attainment and management of competencies in a transdisciplinary degree program. In Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference, Multidisciplinary Engineering Division. Washington, DC: ASEE. https://doi.org/10.18260/p.25977
Walther, J., Miller, S. E., & Sochacka, N. W. (2017). A model of empathy in engineering as a core skill, practice orientation, and professional way of being. Journal of Engineering Education, 106(1), 123–148. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20159
Warwick, C., Terras, M., & Nyhan, J. (2012). Digital humanities in practice. London: Facet Publishing.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Varner, D., Gray, C.M., Exter, M.E. (2020). A Content-Agnostic Praxis for Transdisciplinary Education. In: Hokanson, B., Clinton, G., Tawfik, A.A., Grincewicz, A., Schmidt, M. (eds) Educational Technology Beyond Content. Educational Communications and Technology: Issues and Innovations. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37254-5_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37254-5_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-37253-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-37254-5
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)