Corrected Overlap Weight and Clustering Coefficient

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Challenges in Social Network Research

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Social Networks ((LNSN))

  • 851 Accesses

Abstract

We discuss two well-known network measures: the overlap weight of an edge and the clustering coefficient of a node. For both of them it turns out that they are not very useful for data analytic task to identify important elements (nodes or links) of a given network. The reason for this is that they attain their largest values on maximal subgraphs of relatively small size that are more probable to appear in a network than that of larger size. We show how the definitions of these measures can be corrected in such a way that they give the expected results. We illustrate the proposed corrected measures by applying them to the US Airports network using the program Pajek.

Mathematics Subject Classification 2010: 91D30, 91C05, 05C85, 68R10, 05C42

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 85.59
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
EUR 106.99
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
EUR 106.99
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wasserman, S., Faust, K.: Social Network Analysis Methods and Applications. Structural Analysis in the Social Sciences. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1995)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Todeschini, R., Consonni, V.: Molecular Descriptors for Chemoinformatics, 2nd edn. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim (2009)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Onnela, J.P., Saramaki, J., Hyvonen, J., Szabo, G., Lazer, D., Kaski, K., Kertesz, J., Barabasi, A.L.: Structure and tie strengths in mobile communication networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 104(18), 7332 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Holland, P.W., Leinhardt, S.: Transitivity in structural models of small groups. Comp. Group Stud. 2, 107–124 (1971)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Watts, D.J., Strogatz, S.: Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature 393(6684), 440–442 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Melançon, G., Sallaberry, A.: Edge metrics for visual graph analytics: a comparative study. In: 12th International Conference Information Visualisation, pp. 610–615 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Nocaj, A., Ortmann, M., Brandes, U.: Untangling the hairballs of multi-centered, small-world online social media networks. J. Graph Algorithms Appl. 19(2), 595–618 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Nocaj, A., Ortmann, M., Brandes, U.: Adaptive disentanglement based on local clustering in small-world network visualization. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 22(6), 1662–1671 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wikipedia: (2018). Clustering coefficient: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clustering_coeflcient, Overlap coefficient: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overlap_coeflcient, Hamming distance: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamming_distance, Jaccard index: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jaccard_index

  10. Batagelj, V., Mrvar, A.: Pajek data sets: US Airports network (2006). http://vlado.fmf.uni-lj.si/pub/networks/data/mix/USAir97.net

    Google Scholar 

  11. De Nooy, W., Mrvar, A., Batagelj, V.: Exploratory Social Network Analysis with Pajek; Revised and Expanded Edition for Updated Software. Structural Analysis in the Social Sciences. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2018)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Batagelj, V.: Corrected (2016). https://github.com/bavla/corrected

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The computations were done combining Pajek [11] with short programs in Python and R [12].

This work is supported in part by the Slovenian Research Agency (research program P1-0294 and research projects J1-9187 and J7-8279) and by Russian Academic Excellence Project “5-100.”

This paper is a detailed and extended version of the talk presented at the CMStatistics (ERCIM) 2015 Conference. The author’s attendance on the conference was partially supported by the COST Action IC1408—CRoNoS.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vladimir Batagelj .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Batagelj, V. (2020). Corrected Overlap Weight and Clustering Coefficient. In: Ragozini, G., Vitale, M. (eds) Challenges in Social Network Research. Lecture Notes in Social Networks. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31463-7_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31463-7_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-31462-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-31463-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation