Abstract
Research on extremism and the Internet has primarily been concerned with violent Islamic groups and their networks and to a lesser extent far right groups. Such a focus has meant that the study of violent animal rights extremism and the Internet has largely been neglected despite the Internet providing animal rights extremists with a medium through which to network, exchange information and coordinate their activities both at the national and international level. Websites like Bite Back and the Animal Liberation Front worldwide news and information resource contain claims of responsibility for animal rights actions, direct action guides, Internet security advice, interviews with activists, details of snitches, lists of current prisoners and material on potential targets. This chapter explores how violent animal rights extremists use the Internet in the pursuit of their cause and compares their usage to other violent extremists, drawing upon the existing literature.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
AFP. (2017, June 26). Govt Websites in Ohio, Maryland Hacked with Pro-IS Messages. Security Week. Retrieved June 18, 2018, from https://www.securityweek.com/govt-websites-ohio-maryland-hacked-pro-messages.
Arkangel. (n.d.). ALF: The Early Years Part 1. Arkangel, No. 30, pp. 17–30.
Baravalle, S., Sanchez Lopez, M., & Wee Lee, S. (2016). Mining the Dark Web: Drugs and Fake Ids. Proceedings of IEEE 16th International Conference on Data Mining Workshops (ICDMW), 12–15 December, Barcelona, Spain.
Baynes, C. (2018, January 26). Animal Rights Campaigners Sentenced After Protest Group Sent ‘Aids-Contaminated’ Post to Researchers. The Independent. Retrieved May 19, 2018, from https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/animal-rights-campaign-aids-contaminated-post-letters-research-testing-shac-winchester-crown-court-a8177936.html.
Benson, D. C. (2014). Why the Internet Is Not Increasing Terrorism. Security Studies, 23(2), 293–328.
Bouchard, M., & Levey, P. (2015). Radical and Connected. In M. Bouchard (Ed.), Social Networks, Terrorism and Counterterrorism: Radical and Connected (pp. 1–8). Abingdon: Routledge.
Carson, J. V., LaFree, G., & Dugan, L. (2012). Terrorist and Non-terrorist Criminal Attacks by Radical Environmental and Animal Rights Groups in the United States, 1970–2007. Terrorism and Political Violence, 24(2), 295–319.
Conway, M. (2017). Determining the Role of the Internet in Violent Extremism and Terrorism: Six Suggestions for Progressing Research. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, 40(1), 77–98.
Crilly, K. (2001). Information Warfare: New Battlefields Terrorists, Propaganda and the Internet. Aslib Proceedings, 53(7), 250–264.
Davies, B., & Harré, R. (1990). Positioning: The Discursive Production of Selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 20(1), 43–63.
Davies, G., Bouchard, M., Wu, E., Joffres, K., & Frank, R. (2015). ‘Terrorist and Extremist Organizations’ Use of the Internet for Recruitment. In M. Bouchard (Ed.), Social Networks, Terrorism and Counterterrorism: Radical and Connected (pp. 105–127). Abingdon: Routledge.
Esrock, S. L., & Leichty, G. B. (1998). Social Responsibility and Corporate Web Pages: Self-Presentation or Agenda-Setting? Public Relations Review, 24(3), 305–319.
Europol. (2014). The Internet Organised Crime Threat Assessment (iOCTA). European Cybercrime Centre. Retrieved May 16, 2018, from https://www.europol.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/europol_iocta_web.pdf.
Europol. (2018). EU Terrorism Situation and Trend Report. Retrieved June 17, 2018, from https://www.europol.europa.eu/activities-services/main-reports/eu-terrorism-situation-and-trend-report.
Flükiger, J.-M. (2008). An Appraisal of the Radical Animal Liberation Movement in Switzerland: 2003 to March 2007. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, 31(2), 145–157.
Garner, R. (2004). Animals, Politics and Morality (2nd ed.). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Hale, W. C. (2012). Extremism on the World Wide Web: A Research Review. Criminal Justice Studies, 24(4), 1–14.
Henshaw, D. (1989). Animal Warfare. London: Fontana.
Herzog, H. A. (1993). The Movement Is My Life’: The Psychology of Animal Rights Activism. Journal of Social Issues, 49(1), 103–119.
Herzog, H. A., Dinoff, B., & Page, J. R. (1997). Animal Rights Talk: Moral Debate over the Internet. Qualitative Sociology, 20(3), 399–418.
Hurlburt, G. (2017). Shining Light on the Dark Web. Computer, 40(4), 100–105.
Jasper, J. M., & Nelkin, D. (1992). The Animal Rights Crusade. New York: Free Press.
Jonas, K. (2004). Bricks and Bullhorns. In S. Best & A. Nocella (Eds.), Terrorists or Freedom Fighters: Reflections on the Liberation of Animals (pp. 263–271). New York: Lantern Books.
Kaplan, E. (2009). Terrorists and the Internet. Council on Foreign Relations. Retrieved February 10, 2018, from http://www.cfr.org/publications/10005/.
Leiner, B. M., Cerf, V. G., Clark, D. D., Kahn, R. E., Klienrock, L., Lynch, D. C., Postel, J., Roberts, L. G., & Wolff, S. (1997). Brief History of the Internet. Internet Society. Retrieved June 1, 2018, from https://www.Internetsociety.org/Internet/history-Internet/brief-history-Internet/.
Lewis, J. E. (2004). Deputy Assistant Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Before the Senate Judiciary Committee, Washington DC. Retrieved February 10, 2018, from https://archives.fbi.gov/archives/news/testimony/animal-rights-extremism-and-ecoterrorism.
Mahmood, S. (2012). Online Social Networks: The Overt and Covert Communication Channels for Terrorists and Beyond. 2012 IEEE Conference on Technologies for Homeland Security (HST). https://doi.org/10.1109/ths.2012.6459912.
Metcalfe, D. (2008). The Protest Game: Animal Rights Protests and the Life Sciences Industry. Negotiation Journal, 24(2), 125–143.
Miller, G. R. (1989). Persuasion and Public Relations: Two P’s in a Pod. In C. H. Botan & V. Hazleton (Eds.), Public Relations Theory (pp. 45–66). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Monaghan, R. (1997). Animal Rights and Violent Protest. Terrorism and Political Violence, 9(4), 106–116.
Monaghan, R. (1999). Terrorism in the Name of Animal Rights. Terrorism and Political Violence, 11(4), 159–169.
Monaghan, R. (2000). Single-Issue Terrorism: A Neglected Phenomenon. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, 23(4), 255–265.
Monaghan, R. (2013). Not Quite Terrorism: Animal Rights Extremism in the United Kingdom. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, 36(11), 933–951.
Motoyama, M., McCoy, D., Levchenko, K., Savage, S., & Voelker, G. M. (2011). An Analysis of Underground Forums. Proceedings of the 2011 ACM SIGCOMM Conference on Internet Measurement Conference, November 2–4, Berlin, Germany.
Nacos, B. L. (2016). Terrorism and Counterterrorism (5th ed.). New York: Routledge.
Oh, O., Agrawal, M., & Rao, R. (2011). Information Control and Terrorism: Tracking the Mumbai Terrorist Attack through Twitter. Information Systems Frontier, 13, 33–43.
Perry, T. S. (1992). Forces for Social Change. IEEE Spectrum, 29, 30–32.
Regan, T. (2004). How to Justify Violence. In S. Best & A. J. Nocella II (Eds.), Terrorists or Freedom Fighters? (pp. 231–236). New York: Lantern Books.
Scudder, J. N., & Bishop Mills, C. (2009). The Credibility of Shock Advocacy: Animal Rights Attack Messages. Public Relations Review, 35(2), 162–164.
Smith, M. F., & Ferguson, D. P. (2001). Activism. In R. E. Heath (Ed.), Handbook of Public Relations (pp. 291–300). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Troup Buchanan, R. (2015, July 25). US Animal Activists Charged with Domestic Terrorism After Allegedly Freeing Almost 6000 Minks. The Independent. Retrieved May 20, 2018, from https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-animal-activists-charged-with-domestic-terrorism-after-allegedly-freeing-almost-6000-minks-10415892.html.
Upton, A. (2010). Contingent Communication in a Hybrid Multi-Media World: Analysing the Campaigning Strategies of SHAC. New Media & Society, 13(1), 96–113.
Veganarchy. (2014). Anti-Speciesist Warfare and Direct Action. Retrieved June 18, 2018, from https://animalliberationpressoffice.org/publications%20online/VEGANARCHY-Anti-Speciesist-Warfare-and-Direct-Action.pdf.
Waters, R. D., & Wang, M. L. (2011). Advocacy on the Internet: Lessons Learned from the Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act of 2005. Journal of Promotion Management, 17, 241–256.
Webb, R. (2003). Staying on Target and Going the Distance: An Interview with the UK ALF Press Officer Robin Webb. No Compromise, Fall. Retrieved December 4, 2012, from http://www.nocompromise.org/issues/22index.html.
Weimann, G. (2004). www.terror.net: How Modern Terrorism Uses the Internet. United States Institute of Peace, Special Report, 116. USIP, Washington, DC. Retrieved from https://www.usip.org/publications/2004/03/wwwterrornet-how-modern-terrorism-uses-Internet.
Weimann, G. (2005). Cyberterrorism: The Sum of All Fears? Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, 28(2), 129–149.
Acknowledgement
We would like to thank Dr Brian Payne for his feedback on an early version of this chapter.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
McAlister, R., Monaghan, R. (2020). Animal Rights Extremism and the Internet. In: Littler, M., Lee, B. (eds) Digital Extremisms. Palgrave Studies in Cybercrime and Cybersecurity. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30138-5_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30138-5_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-30137-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-30138-5
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)