Critique of Romanization in Classical Archaeology

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology
  • 113 Accesses

Introduction

During the 1990s, archaeologists and historians of the late Iron Age and Roman period sparked discussion on the concept of Romanization which was an omnipresent and predominant interpretational framework in the Roman studies of the Western academic tradition. Scholars such as Martin Millett, David Mattingly, Jane Webster, Richard Hingley, Greg Woolf, Nico Roymans, Ton Derks, Nicola Terrenato, Benjamin Isaac, Peter Wells, and Colin Haselgrove (to name just a few) started to reconsider traditional approaches drawing inspiration from postcolonial intellectual waves and processual and post-processual archaeological paradigms. Primarily, they have addressed previous academic favoritism of the Roman side within simplistically and ethnocentrically conceptualized binary opposition of “Romans” and “barbarians/natives.” This black-and-white perspective was constituted within the context of nineteenth- and twentieth-century European imperialisms and colonialisms, accompanying...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Derks, T., and N. Roymans, eds. 2009. Ethnic constructs in antiquity: The role of power and tradition. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Díaz-Andreu, M. 2007. A world history of nineteenth-century archaeology: Nationalism, colonialism, and the past. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietler, M. 2005. The archaeology of colonization and the colonization of archaeology: Theoretical challenges from an ancient Mediterranean colonial encounter. In The archaeology of colonial encounters: Comparative perspectives, ed. G.J. Stein, 33–68. Santa Fe: School of American Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, R. 2008. Utopia antiqua: Readings of the golden age and decline at Rome. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, A. 2013. Thinking about Roman imperialism: Postcolonialism, globalisation and beyond? Britannia 44: 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González-Ruibal, A., ed. 2013. Reclaiming archaeology. Beyond the tropes of modernity. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez Sanchez, S., and A. Guglielmi, eds. 2017. Romans and barbarians beyond the frontiers. Archaeology, ideology and identities in the North. Oxford: Oxbow Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hingley, R. 2005. Globalizing Roman culture: Unity, diversity and empire. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hingley, R. 2012. Romanization. In Encyclopedia of global archaeology, ed. C. Smith, 6373–6380. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgen, M.T. 1964. Early anthropology in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hoyos, D., ed. 2013. A companion to Roman imperialism. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isaac, B. 2004. The invention of racism in classical antiquity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janković, M.A., and V.D. Mihajlović, eds. 2018. Reflections of the Roman imperialisms. Newcastle: CSP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janković, M.A., V.D. Mihajlović, and S. Babić, eds. 2014. The edges of the Roman world. Newcastle: CSP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurence, R. 2012. Roman archaeology for historians. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mattingly, D.J. 2011. Imperialism, power and identity: Experiencing Roman Empire. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitts, M., and M.J. Versluys, eds. 2015. Globalisation and the Roman world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Revell, L. 2016. Ways of being Roman. Oxford: Oxbow Books.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rüpke, J. 2016. On Roman religion. Lived religion and the individual in ancient Rome. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, S., and J. Webster, eds. 2003. Roman imperialism and provincial art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoczkowski, W. 2002. Explaining human origins: Myth, imagination and conjecture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Van Oyen, A., and M. Pitts, eds. 2017. Materialising Roman histories. Oxford: Oxbow Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Versluys, M.J. 2014. Understanding objects in motion. An archaeological dialogue on Romanization (with responses from Hingley, R., Hodos, T., Stek, T.D., van Dommelen, P., and Woolf, G.). Archaeological Dialogues 21: 1–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woolf, G. 2011. Tales of the barbarians: Ethnography and empire in the Roman West. Oxford: Wiley-Blacкwell.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vladimir D. Mihajlović .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Mihajlović, V.D. (2020). Critique of Romanization in Classical Archaeology. In: Smith, C. (eds) Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30018-0_3115

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation