SpringerLink
Log in

Technology-Enhanced Psychology Learning and Teaching

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
International Handbook of Psychology Learning and Teaching

Part of the book series: Springer International Handbooks of Education ((SIHE))

  • 1307 Accesses

Abstract

The design and development of technology-enhanced psychology learning units underly the same principles as any other content. The specificity results from variables concerning the structure of the respective subject matter and variables of the learners. The chapter shows main aspects of the instructional design (ID) of multimedia-supported psychology teaching units to be considered in ID decisions. These aspects are bundled in the DO ID framework model; the focus here is on suitable formats of instruction and technical topics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. R. (1990). The adaptive character of thought (studies in cognition). New York: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury, N. A. (2016). Attention span during lectures: 8 seconds, 10 minutes, or more? Advantages in Physiology Education, 40, 509–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, M. (1998). Philosophy of science: From explanation to justification (vol. 2). Boston, MA: Transaction Publishers: (1967, Springer)

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. B. (1963). A model of school learning. Teachers College Record, 64, 723–733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. B. (1989). The Carroll model. A 25-year retrospective and prospective view. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 26–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, D., Kong, X., & Wei, Q. (2020). Design and development of psychological virtual simulation experiment teaching system. Computer Applications in Engineering Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22293

  • Cleland, J. (2017). Simulation-based education. The Psychologist (30, October). https://thepsychologist.bps.org.uk/volume-30/october/simulation-based-education (access february 2021)

  • Domagk, S., Schwartz, R., & Plass, J. (2010). Interactivity in multimedia learning: An integrated model. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1024–1033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dörner, D., Kreuzig, H. W., Reither, F., & Stäudel, T. (1983). Lohhausen. Huber, Bern/Stuttgart/Wien: Vom Umgang mit Unbestimmtheit und Komplexität.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishman, B., & Penuel, W. (2018). Design-based implementation research. In F. Fischer, C. E. Hmelo-Silver, S. R. Goldman, & P. Reimann (Eds.), International handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 393–400). New York: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Foreman, N. (2009). Virtual reality in psychology. Themes in Science and Technology Education, 2(1–2). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1131318.pdf

  • Gagné, R. M., & Briggs, L. J. (1979). Principles of instructional design. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graesser, A. C., Person, N. K., & Huber, J. (1993). Question asking during tutoring and in the design of educational software. In M. Rabinowitz (Ed.), Cognitive science foundations of instruction (pp. 149–172). New York: Routledge. (eBook edition: 2020). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315044712

  • Herrmann, T. (1979a). Psychologie als problem. Herausforderungen der psychologischen Wissenschaft. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrmann, T. (1979b). Pädagogische Pychologie als psychologische Technologie. In J. Brandtstädter, G. Reinert, & K. A. Schneewind (Eds.), Pädagogische Psychologie: Probleme und Perspektiven (pp. 209–236). Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ifenthaler, D., & Drachsler, H. (2020). Learning analytics. In H. Niegemann & A. Weinberger (Eds.), Handbuch Bildungstechnologie (pp. 515–534). Berlin, Germany: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, J. M., & Deimann, M. (2018). Motivation, volition, and performance. In R. A. Reiser & J. V. Dempsey (Eds.), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (pp. 78–86). New York: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klauer, K. J. (1985). Framework for a theory of teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 1(1), 5–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kögler, K., Rausch, A., & Niegemann, H. (2020). Interpretierbarkeit von Logdaten in computerbasierten Kompetenztests mit großen Handlungsräumen. bwp@ Profil6. Berufliches Lehren und Lernen: Grundlagen, Schwerpunkte und Impulse wirtschaftspädagogischer Forschung. Hrsg. v. Karin Heinrichs, Kristina Kögler & Christin Siegfried, September 2020. https://www.researchgate.net/deref/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.bwpat.de%2Fprofil6_wuttke%2Fkoegler_etal_profil6.pdf

  • Korbach, A., & Niegemann, H. (2020). Microlearning via smartphones in VET for professional drivers: The case of securing cargo for international transport. In E. Wuttke, J. Seyfried, & H. Niegemann (Eds.), Vocational education and training in the age of digitization. Challenges and opportunities (pp. 183–201). Leverkusen: Barbara Budrich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E. (2021). Multimedia learning (3rd ed.). Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMinn, M. R. (2009). Ethics case-study simulation: A generic tool for psychology teachers. Teaching of Psychology, 15(2), 100–101. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328023top1502_9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. M., & Kemp, J. E. (2004). Designing effective instruction (4th ed.). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narciss, S. (2008). Feedback strategies for interactive learning tasks. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. van Merriënboer, & M. P. Driscoll (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (3rd ed., pp. 125–143). New York: L. Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narciss, S. (2020). Feedbackstrategien für interaktive Lernaufgaben. In H. Niegemann & A. Weinberger (Eds.), Handbuch Bildungstechnologie (pp. 369–392). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-54373-3_8-1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Niegemann, H. (2020). Instructional design. In H. Niegemann & A. Weinberger (Eds.), Handbuch Bildungstechnologie (pp. 95–152). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niegemann, H. M., & Heidig, S. (2020). Interaktivität und Adaptivität in multimedialen Lernumgebungen. In H. Niegemann & A. Weinberger (Eds.), Handbuch Bildungstechnologie. Berlin, Germany: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niegemann, H. M., et al. (2008). Kompendium multimediales Lernen. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oser, F., & Baeriswyl, F. J. (2001). Choreographies of teaching: Bridging instruction to learning. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 1031–1065). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plass, J., Moreno, R., & Brünken, R. (Eds.). (2010). Cognitive load theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichardt, C. S. (2019). Quasi-experimentation: A guide to design and analysis. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reigeluth, C. M. (1999). The elaboration theory: Guidance for scope and sequence decisions. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models. A new paradigm of instructional theory (pp. 425–453). Hoboken, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, M. J. (2018). Performance support. In R. A. Reiser & J. V. Dempsey (Eds.), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (4th ed., pp. 132–141). New York: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saettler, P. (1990). The evolution of American educational technology. Englewood, Colorado: Libraries Unlimited, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schank, R. C. (1990). Tell me a story : A new look at real and artificial memory. New York: Scribner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schank, R. C., Berman, T. R., & Macpherson, K. A. (1999). Learning by doing. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design – Theories and models. A new paradigm of instructional theory (pp. 161–182). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnotz, W., Eckhardt, A., Molz, M., Niegemann, H. M., & Hochscheid-Mauel, D. (2004). Deconstructing instructional design models: Toward an integrative conceptual framework for instructional design research. In H. Niegemann, D. Leutner, & R. Brünken (Eds.), Instructional design for multimedia learning (pp. 71–90). Münster, Germany: Waxmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seels, B. B., & Richey, R. (1994). Instructional technology: The definition and domains of the field. Washington, D.C.: Association for Educational Communications and Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidl, R. (2020). Grafikdesign: eine Einführung im Kontext multimedialer Lernumgebungen. In H. Niegemann & A. Weinberger (Eds.), Handbuch Bildungstechnologie (pp. 439–478). Berlin, Germany: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-54373-3_8-1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R. E. (1990). Mastery learning re-reconsidered. Review of Educational Research, 60(2), 300–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. L., & Ragan, T. J. (2005). Instructional design (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley/Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Um, E. R., Plass, J. L., Hayward, E. O., & Homer, B. D. (2012). Emotional design in multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(2), 485–498. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Kirschner, P. A. (2018). Ten steps to complex learning. A systematic approach to four-component instructional design (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weltner, K. (1975). Das Konzept des integrierenden Leitprogramms - ein Instrument zur Förderung der Studienfähigkeit. Informationen zur Hochschuldidaktik, H., 12, 292–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weltner, K., & Wiesner, H. (1973). Förderung von Selbstinstruktionstechniken im Hochschulunterricht durch integrierende Leitprogramme. Unterrichtswissenschaft(2/3), 111–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, B. D. (2008). Development in video technology for coaching. Sports Technology, 1(1), 34–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/19346182.2008.9648449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, K., & Korn, J. H. (2007). Attention during lectures: Beyond ten minutes. Teaching of Psychology, 85–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winn, W., & Jackson, R. (1999). Fourteen propositions about educational uses of virtual reality. Educational Technology (July-August), 5–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zander, S., Behrens, A., & Mehlhorn, S. (2020). Erklärvideos als format des E-learning. In H. M. Niegemann & A. Weinberger (Eds.), Handbuch Bildungstechnologie (pp. 247–258). Berlin, Germany: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-54373-3_8-1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zumbach, J. (2002). Goal-Based Scenarios. Realitätsnahe Vorgaben sichern den Lernerfolg. In U. Scheffer & F. W. Hesse (Eds.), E-Learning. Die Revolution des Lernens gewinnbringend einsetzen (pp. 67–82). Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Saarland University, Educational Technology, Saarbrücken, Germany

    Helmut Niegemann

Authors
  1. Helmut Niegemann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Helmut Niegemann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Educational Research, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria

    Joerg Zumbach

  2. Department of Psychology, University of South Florida, Bonita Springs, FL, USA

    Douglas A. Bernstein

  3. School of Science - Faculty of Psychology, Psychology of Learning and Instruction, Technische Universitaet Dresden, Dresden, Sachsen, Germany

    Susanne Narciss

  4. Department of Human, Philosophical and Educational Sciences (DISUFF), University of Salerno, Fisciano, Italy

    Giuseppina Marsico

Section Editor information

  1. University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria

    Joerg Zumbach

  2. Psychologie des Lehrens und Lernens, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Deutschland

    Susanne Narciss

  3. Department of Psychology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA

    Douglas A. Bernstein

  4. University of Salerno, Fisciano, Italy

    Giuseppina Marsico

  5. Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Brazil

    Giuseppina Marsico

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Niegemann, H. (2023). Technology-Enhanced Psychology Learning and Teaching. In: Zumbach, J., Bernstein, D.A., Narciss, S., Marsico, G. (eds) International Handbook of Psychology Learning and Teaching. Springer International Handbooks of Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28745-0_64

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation