The Patient–Therapist Relationship in Intercultural Psychotherapy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Intercultural Psychotherapy
  • 1246 Accesses

Abstract

The patient–therapist relationship is crucial for the outcome of psychotherapy. This has been shown in research, and it is also a common opinion among psychotherapists. Nowadays, the relationship is not only seen as a process of transference and countertransference, but also in terms of bonding, setting goals and defining tasks.

Intercultural psychotherapy has its own difficulties, since patients and therapists differ more in these processes. Also, there are commonly quite different idioms of distress. A more thorough phase of determining the relationship is necessary, with stages in which both patients as therapists define their role. In different cultures there are quite different perceptions of their role and identity, which can result in misunderstanding and absence of treatment effect.

In order to overcome these difficulties, a proposal is to use the Cultural Formulation Interview (CFI), an interview designed for situations in which there is a great gap between the culture of the patient and of the therapist. Next to this core CFI there is a supplementary module, the Patient–Clinician Relationship Module, which can enlarge the relationship because in this interview most of the delicate questions are asked for.

To write prescriptions is easy, but to relate to people in other ways is difficult.—Franz Kafka (1919): A country doctor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Cultural identity of the individual: describes the individual’s racial, ethnic, or cultural reference groups that may influence his or her relationships with others, access to sources, and developmental and current challenges, conflicts, or predicaments. For immigrants and racial or ethnic communities, the degree and kinds of involvement with both the culture of origin and the host culture should be noted separately. Language abilities, preferences, and patterns of use are relevant for identifying difficulties with access to care, social integration, and the need for an interpreter. Other clinically relevant aspects of identity may include religious affiliation, socioeconomic background, personal and family places of birth and growing up, migrant status, and sexual orientation ([38], pp. 749–750).

  2. 2.

    Cultural conceptualisations of distress: describe the cultural constructs that influence how the individual experiences, understands, and communicates his or her symptoms or problems to others. These constructs may include cultural syndromes, idioms of distress, and explanatory models or perceived causes. The level of severity and meaning of the distressing experiences should be assessed in relation to the norms of the individual’s cultural reference groups. Assessment of co** and help-seeking patterns should consider the use of professional as well as traditional, alternative, or complementary sources of care ([38], p. 750).

  3. 3.

    Psychosocial stressors and cultural features of vulnerability and resilience: identify key stressors and supports in the individual’s social environment (which may include both local and distant events) and the role of religion, family, and other social networks (e.g. friends, neighbors, co-workers) in providing emotional, instrumental, and informational support. Social stressors and social support vary with cultural interpretation of events, family structure, developmental tasks, and social context. Levels of functioning, disability, and resilience should be assessed in light of individual’s cultural reference groups ([38], p. 750).

  4. 4.

    Cultural features of the relationship between the individual and the clinician: identify differences in culture, language, and social status between an individual and clinician that may cause difficulties in communication and may influence diagnosis and treatment. Experiences of racism and discrimination in the larger society may impede establishing trust and safety in the clinical diagnostic encounter. Effects may include problems eliciting symptoms, misunderstanding of the cultural and clinical significance of symptoms and behaviors, and difficulty establishing or maintaining the rapport needed for an effective clinical alliance ([38], p. 750).

References

  1. Garfield SL. Wiley series on personality processes. In: Psychotherapy: an eclectic-integrative approach. 2nd ed. Oxford: Wiley; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gregg J, Saha S. Losing culture on the way to competence. The use and misuse of culture in medical education. Acad Med. 2003;81:542–7.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wampold BE, Imel ZE. The great psychotherapy debate. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge; 2015.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Koelen J, Rohlof H. De therapeutische relatie: Heilige Graal van de psychotherapeut? [The therapeutic relationship: the Holy Grail of the psychotherapist?]. PsyXpert. 2017;2:38–48.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Meijer Y, de Haan E. Het geheim van de smid. Visie van de behandelaar in de ggz op werkzame factoren in therapie [The secret of the smith. View of the therapist in mental health on effective factors in therapy]. Tijdschr Voor Psychother. 2015;41:22–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Norcross JC. Psychotherapy relationships that work. 1st ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Norcross JC. Psychotherapy relationships that work. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Bordin ES. Theory and research on the therapeutic working alliance: mew directions. In: Horvath AO, Greenberg LS, editors. The working alliance. Theory, research, and practice. New York: Wiley; 1994. p. 13–37.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rogers CR. Client centered therapy. London: Constable; 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rohlof H, van Dijk R, Bäärnhielm S. Patient-clinician relationship. In: Lewis-Fernández R, Aggarwal NK, Hinton L, Hinton D, Kirmayer L, editors. DSM-5 handbook on the cultural formulation interview. Washington: American Psychiatric Publishing; 2015. p. 145–55.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fassaert T, Peen J, van Straten A, et al. Ethnic differences and similarities in outpatient treatment for depression in the Netherlands. Psychiatr Serv. 2010;61:690–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kortmann F. Transcultural psychiatry: from practice to theory. Transcult Psychiatry. 2010;47:203–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Taylor J. Confronting ‘culture’ in medicine’s ‘culture of no culture’. Acad Med. 2003;78:555–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Boutin-Foster C, Foster J, Konopasek L. Physician, know thyself; the professional culture of medicine as a framework for teaching cultural competence. Acad Med. 2008;83:116–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bot H. Dialogue interpreting in mental health. Amsterdam: Rodopi; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Comas-Diaz L, Jacobsen FM. Ethnocultural transference and countertransference in the therapeutic dyad. Am J Orthopsychiat. 1991;61:392–402.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hylland Eriksen T. What is anthropology? London: Pluto Press; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rudolph JW, Taylor SS, Foldy EG. Collaborative off-line reflection: a way to develop skill in action science and action inquiry, in handbook of action research. In: Reason P, Bradbury H, editors. Participative Inquiry and practice. London: Sage; 2001. p. 405–12.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Blom MBJ, Hoek HW, Spinhoven P, Hoencamp E, Haffmans PMJ, van Dyck R. Treatment of depression in patients from ethnic minority groups in the Netherlands. Transcult Psychiatry. 2010;47:473–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. de Haan AM, Boon AE, de Jong JTVM, Geluk CAML, Vermeiren RRJM. Therapeutic relationship and dropout in youth mental health care with ethnic minority children and adolescents. Clin Psychol. 2014;18:1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Knipscheer JW, Mooren T, Kurt A. Klinische psychologie in intercultureel perspectief [Clinical psychology in multicultural perspective]. In: Knipscheer JW, Kleber RJ, editors. Psychologie en de multiculturele samenleving [Psychology and the multicultural society]. The Hague: Boom Lemma; 2008. p. 131–48.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Verhulp EE, Stevens GWJM, Pels TVM, Van Weert CMC, Vollebergh WMA. Lay beliefs about emotional problems and attitudes toward mental health care among parents and adolescents: exploring the impact of immigration. Cult Divers Ethn Minor Psychol. 2017;23:269–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Fassaert T, de Wit MAS, Tuinebreijer WC, Verhoeff AP, Beekman ATF, Dekker J. Perceived need for mental health care among non-western labour migrants. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2009;44:208–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gerritsen AA, Bramsen I, Devillé W, van Willigen LHM, Hovens JE, van der Ploeg HM. Use of health care services by Afghan, Iranian, and Somali refugees and asylum seekers living in The Netherlands. Eur J Pub Health. 2006;16:394–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Laban CJ, Gernaat HBPE, Komproe IH, van der Tweel I, De Jong JTVM. Postmigration living problems and common psychiatric disorders in Iraqi asylum seekers in the Netherlands. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2005;193:825–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bot H, Wadensjo C. The presence of a third party: a dialogical view on interpreter-assisted treatment. In: Wilson JP, Drozdek B, editors. Broken spirits: the treatment of traumatized asylum seekers, refugees, war and torture victims. New York: Brunner-Routledge; 2004. p. 355–78.

    Google Scholar 

  27. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of psychiatric disorders, IV, text revision. Washington: American Psychiatric Press; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ton H, Lim RF. The assessment of culturally diverse individuals. In: Lim RF, editor. Clinical manual of cultural psychiatry. Washington: American Psychiatric Publishing; 2006. p. 3–31.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Mesquita B, Boiger M, De Leersnyder J. The cultural construction of emotions. Curr Opin Psychol. 2016;8:31–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ji l, Yap S. Culture and cognition. Curr Opin Psychol. 2016;8:105–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kirmayer LJ, Ryder AG. Culture and psychopathology. Curr Opin Psychol. 2016;8:143–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Balkir N. Mental illness models and help-seeking behaviors among Turkish immigrants in Europe. In: Barnow S, Balkir N, editors. Cultural variations in psychopathology. Cambridge: Hogrefe; 2013. p. 233–47.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kayrouz R, Dear BF, Johnston L, Keyrouz L, Nehme E, Laube R, Titov N. Intergenerational and cross-cultural differences in emotional wellbeing, mental health service utilisation, treatment-seeking preferences and acceptability of psychological treatments for Arab Australians. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2015;61:484–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Bhui K, Stansfeld S, Hull S, Priebe S, Mole F, Feder G. Ethnic variations in pathways to and use of specialist mental health services in the UK. Systematic review. Br J Psychiatry. 2003;182:105–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Hinton DE, Kirmayer LJ. Local responses to trauma: symptom, affect, and healing. Transcult Psychiatry. 2013;50:607–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Qureshi A, Falgàs I, Collazos F, Hinton L. Psychosocial stressors. In: Lewis-Fernández R, Aggarwal NK, Hinton L, Hinton DE, Kirmayer LJ, editors. DSM-5 handbook on the cultural formulation interview. Arlington: American Psychiatric Publishing; 2016. p. 81–9.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Berry JW. Conceptual approaches to acculturation. In: Chun KM, Balls Organista P, Marín G, editors. Acculturation. Washington: American Psychological Association; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Fassaert T, De Wit MAS, Tuinebreijer WC, Knipscheer JW, Verhoeff AP, Beekman ATF, Dekker J. Acculturation and psychological distress among non-western Muslim migrants – a population-based survey. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2011;57:132–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 5th ed. Washington: American Psychiatric Association; 2013.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  40. Kleinman A, Benson P. Anthropology in the clinic. The problem of cultural competency and how to fix it. PLoS Med. 2006;3:1673–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Kleinman A. Patients and healers in the context of culture. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Kirmayer L. Cultural competence and evidence-based practice in mental health. Soc Sci Med. 2012;75:249–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Feldmann T, Bensing J, De Ruijter A. ‘Worries are the mother of all diseases’; general practitioners and refugees in the Netherlands on stress, illness and prejudice. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;3:369–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Kleinman A. Culture and psychiatric diagnosis. What are the necessary tools? Utrecht: Trimbos Institute; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Lakes K, Lopez S, Garro L. Cultural competence and psychotherapy: applying informed conceptions of culture. Psychother Res Pract Theory. 2006;43:380–96.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Lewis-Fernandez R. Cultural formulation of psychiatric diagnosis. Cult Med Psychiatry. 1996;20:133–44.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Supplement (Freely Downloadable at https://www.psychiatry.org/)

Supplement (Freely Downloadable at https://www.psychiatry.org/)

Supplementary Module of the Cultural Formulation Interview

Patient–Clinician Relationship

Related Core CFI Question

16 Some of the core CFI questions are repeated below and are marked with an asterisk (∗). The CFI question that is repeated is indicated in brackets.

Guide to Interviewer

The following questions address the role of culture in the patient–clinician relationship with respect to the individual’s presenting concerns and to the clinician’s evaluation of the individual’s problem. We use the word culture broadly to refer to all the ways the individual understands his or her identity and experience in terms of groups, communities or other collectivities, including national or geographic origin, ethnic community, racialised categories, gender, sexual orientation, social class, religion/spirituality and language.

The first set of questions evaluates four domains in the clinician–patient relationship from the point of view of the patient: experiences, expectations, communication and possibility of collaboration with the clinician. The second set of questions is directed to the clinician to guide reflection on the role of cultural factors in the clinical relationship, the assessment and treatment planning.

Introduction for the Patient

I would like to learn about how it has been for you to talk with me and other clinicians about your [PROBLEM] and your health more generally. I will ask some questions about your views, concerns and expectations.

Questions for the Patient:

  • What kind of experiences have you had with clinicians in the past? What was most helpful to you?

  • Have you had difficulties with clinicians in the past? What did you find difficult or unhelpful?

  • Now let’s talk about the help that you would like to get here. Some people prefer clinicians of a similar background (for example, age, race, religion or some other characteristic) because they think it may be easier to understand each other. Do you have any preference or ideas about what kind of clinician might understand you best?

  • ∗Sometimes differences among patients and clinicians make it difficult for them to understand each other. Do you have any concerns about this? If so, in what way? [RELATED TO CFI Q#16.]

Guide to Interviewer

Question #5 addresses the patient–clinician relationship moving forward in treatment. It elicits the patient’s expectations of the clinician and may be used to start a discussion on how the two of them can collaborate in the individual’s care.

  • What patients expect from their clinicians is important. As we move forward in your care, how can we best work together?

Questions for the Clinician After the Interview:

  • How did you feel about your relationship with the patient? Did cultural similarities and differences influence your relationship? In what way?

  • What was the quality of communication with the patient? Did cultural similarities and differences influence your communication? In what way?

  • If you used an interpreter, how did the presence of an interpreter or his/her way of interpreting influence your relationship or your communication with the patient and the information you received?

  • How do the patient’s cultural background or identity, life situation, and/or social context influence your understanding of his/her problem and your diagnostic assessment?

  • How do the patient’s cultural background or identity, life situation, and/or social context influence your treatment plan or recommendations?

  • Did the clinical encounter confirm or call into question any of your prior ideas about the cultural background or identity of the patient? If so, in what way?

  • Are there aspects of your own identity that may influence your attitudes toward this patient?

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Rohlof, H. (2020). The Patient–Therapist Relationship in Intercultural Psychotherapy. In: Schouler-Ocak, M., Kastrup, M. (eds) Intercultural Psychotherapy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24082-0_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24082-0_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-24081-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-24082-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation