Abstract

This article describes a number of new techniques useful for the construction of biomechanical and anatomical models, particularly those that employ combined FEM-multibody simulation. They are being introduced to the ArtiSynth mechanical modeling system, and include reduced coordinate modeling, in which an FEM model is made more computationally efficient by reducing it to a low degree-of-freedom subspace; new methods for connecting points and coordinate frames directly to deformable bodies; and the ability to create skin and embedded meshes that are connected to underlying FEM models and other dynamic components. All these techniques are based on the principle of virtual work, and we illustrate their application with a number of examples, including a reduced FEM tongue model, subject-specific skeletal registration, skinning applied to modeling the human airway, and a detailed model of the human masseter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
GBP 19.95
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
GBP 35.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
GBP 44.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
GBP 44.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. An SS, Kim T, James DL (2008) Optimizing cubature for efficient integration of subspace deformations. ACM Trans Graph (TOG) 27(5):165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson P, Fels S, Harandi NM, Ho A, Moisik S, Sánchez CA, Stavness I, Tang K (2017) Frank: s hybrid 3d biomechanical model of the head and neck. Biomechanics of living organs. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 413–447

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Barbič J, James DL (2005) Real-time subspace integration for st. venant-kirchhoff deformable models. ACM Trans Graph (TOG) 24(3):982–990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Besl PJ, McKay ND (1992) Method for registration of 3-d shapes. In: Sensor fusion iv: control paradigms and data structures, vol 1611. International Society for Optics and Photonics, pp 586–607

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bonet J, Wood RD (2008) Nonlinear continuum mechanics for finite element analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Buchaillard Stéphanie, Perrier Pascal, Payan Yohan (2009) A biomechanical model of cardinal vowel production: muscle activations and the impact of gravity on tongue positioning. J Acoust Soc Am 126(4):2033–2051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Faure F, Duriez C, Delingette H, Allard J, Gilles B, Marchesseau S, Talbot H, Courtecuisse H, Bousquet G, Peterlik I et al (2012) Sofa: a multi-model framework for interactive physical simulation. Soft tissue biomechanical modeling for computer assisted surgery. Springer, Berlin, pp 283–321

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Hermant N, Perrier P, Payan Y (2017) Human tongue biomechanical modeling. Biomechanics of living organs. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 395–411

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Kim SY, Boynton EI, Ravichandiran K, Fung LY, Bleakney R, Agur AM (2007) Three-dimensional study of the musculotendinous architecture of supraspinatus and its functional correlations. Clin Anat Off J Am Assoc Clin Anat Br Assoc Clin Anat 20(6):648–655

    Google Scholar 

  10. Krysl P, Lall S, Marsden JE (2001) Dimensional model reduction in non-linear finite element dynamics of solids and structures. Int J Numer Methods Eng 51(4):479–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee Dongwoon, Ravichandiran Kajeandra, Jackson Ken, Fiume Eugene, Agur Anne (2012) Robust estimation of physiological cross-sectional area and geometric reconstruction for human skeletal muscle. J Biomech 45(8):1507–1513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lloyd JE, Stavness I, Fels S (2012) Artisynth: a fast interactive biomechanical modeling toolkit combining multibody and finite element simulation. Soft tissue biomechanical modeling for computer assisted surgery. Springer, Berlin, pp 355–394

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Nesme M, Kry PG, Jeřábková L, Faure F (2009) Preserving topology and elasticity for embedded deformable models. ACM Trans Graph (TOG) 28:52 ACM

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pentland A, Williams J (1989) Good vibrations: modal dynamics for graphics and animation. Comput Graph 23(3):207–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Perrier A, Luboz V, Bucki M, Cannard F, Vuillerme N, Payan Y (2017) Biomechanical modeling of the foot. Hyperelastic constitutive laws for finite element modeling. Biomechanics of living organs. Academic Press, Cambridge, pp 545–563

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Sánchez CA, Li Z, Hannam AG, Abolmaesumi P, Agur A, Fels S (2017) Constructing detailed subject-specific models of the human masseter. Imaging for patient-customized simulations and systems for point-of-care ultrasound. Springer, Berlin, pp 52–60

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Sanchez CA, Lloyd JE, Li Z, Fels S (2015) Subject-specific modelling of articulated anatomy using finite element models. In: Proceedings of 13th international symposium on computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering (CMBBE)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sanchez CA, Stavness I, Lloyd JE, Hannam AG, Fels S (2014) Modelling mastication: the important role of tendon in force transmission. In: Proceedings of 12th international symposium on computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering (CMBBE)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Schenk Olaf, Gärtner Klaus (2004) Solving unsymmetric sparse systems of linear equations with pardiso. Futur Gener Comput Syst 20(3):475–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sifakis E, Barbic J (2012) FEM simulation of 3d deformable solids: a practitioner’s guide to theory, discretization and model reduction. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH 2012 courses. ACM, p 20

    Google Scholar 

  21. Stavness I, Sánchez CA, Lloyd J, Ho A, Wang J, Fels S, Huang D (2014) Unified skinning of rigid and deformable models for anatomical simulations. In: Proceedings of SIGGRAPH Asia 2014 technical briefs. ACM, p 9

    Google Scholar 

  22. von Tycowicz C, Schulz C, Seidel H-P, Hildebrandt K (2013) An efficient construction of reduced deformable objects. ACM Trans Graph 32(6):213:1–213:10

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John E. Lloyd .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lloyd, J.E. et al. (2019). New Techniques for Combined FEM-Multibody Anatomical Simulation. In: Tavares, J., Fernandes, P. (eds) New Developments on Computational Methods and Imaging in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering. Lecture Notes in Computational Vision and Biomechanics, vol 33. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23073-9_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation