Abstract
This chapter acknowledges that the meanings of conditionals have been hotly debated and yet, despite decades of research on this topic, no definitive or agreed upon solution has been reached. Although it has long been acknowledged that conditionals in English are expressed in ways other than using the standard ‘if p, q’ sentence form, and that conditional sentences using ‘if’ can be put to a multitude of uses other than to express conditional thoughts, what is still lacking is an account that brings all of these uses and forms of conditionals together. This chapter sets the research agenda for the remainder of the book, putting forward the claim that the full range of conditionals can be satisfactorily semantically represented only when we locate their meanings at the level of thought.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Harkins, J., and D.P. Wilkins. 1994. Mparntwe Arrernte and the search for lexical universals. In Semantic and Lexical Universals, ed. C. Goddard and A. Wierzbicka, 285–310. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.
Jaszczolt, K.M. 2005. Default Semantics: Foundations of a Compositional Theory of Acts of Communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jaszczolt, K.M. 2010. Default Semantics. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis, ed. B. Heine and H. Narrog, 193–221. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Elder, CH. (2019). Introduction. In: Context, Cognition and Conditionals. Palgrave Studies in Pragmatics, Language and Cognition. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13799-1_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13799-1_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-13798-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-13799-1
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)