The Joint Optimization of Critical Interdependent Infrastructure of an Electricity-Water-Gas System

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Systems Engineering in Context

Abstract

Electricity, water, and gas systems are critical infrastructures that are sustaining our daily lives. This paper studies the joint operation of these systems through a proposed optimization model and explores the advantage of considering the system of systems. Individual and joint optimizations are studied and compared. The numerical results show that the total electricity cost for these three systems can be reduced by 11.3% via joint optimization. Because the water system and gas system intrinsically include the storages in their systems, the power system can use these storages as the regulation capacity to shift load from peak hours to off-peak hours. Since the saving on the power generation cost surpasses the incremental cost in the operation and maintenance (O&M), the overall economic performance is improved by the joint optimization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

an,bn:

Parameters for pricewise linearization in kW and $, respectively

c1,c2,c3:

Cost coefficients for quadratic electric power curve in $/kW2, $/kW, and $, respectively

h g :

Power coefficient for gas load flow in kW/(m3/h)

h w :

Power coefficient for water load flow in kW/(m3/h)

N s :

Number of points for piecewise linearization

N T :

Number of time steps

\( {p}_p^{\mathrm{ref}} \) :

Nominal pipe pressure reference in Pa

\( {r}_e^{\prime } \) :

Pseudo electricity rate in $/kWh

r e :

Finalized electricity rate in $/kWh

r g :

O&M cost coefficient for gas storage system in $/m3

r p :

O&M cost coefficient for pipe system in $/Pa

r s :

Coefficient of per unit cost of gas supply in $/unit

r w :

O&M cost coefficient for water system in $/m3

\( {S}_p^{\mathrm{ref}} \) :

Nominal pipe storage reference in m3

t :

Time index

T :

Time step constant in hour

V g :

Volume of one unit gas in gas transportation in m3/unit

λn(t):

Ancillary variable for pricewise linearization

Lr(t):

Residential electricity load at time t in kW

Lg(t):

Gas load at time t in m3/h

Lw(t):

Water load at time t in m3/h

m(t):

Gas transportation decision variable at time t in per unit

pp(t):

Pipe pressure status at time t in Pa

Pe(t):

Residential electric load (non-infrastructure electric load) at time t in kW

Pg(t):

Gas system electric load at time t in kW

Pw(t):

Water system electric load at time t in kW

Qg(t):

Gas flow rate at time t in m3/h

Qw(t):

Water flow rate at time t in m3/h

Sg(t):

Gas tank storage status at time t in m3

Sp(t):

Gas pipe storage status at time t in m3

Sw(t):

Water storage status at time t in m3

References

  1. Liu, Y., Qu, Z., **n, H., & Gan, D. (2017). Distributed real-time optimal power flow control in smart grid. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 32(5), 3403–3414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ormsbee, L. E., & Lansey, K. E. (1994). Optimal control of water supply pum** systems. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 120(2), 237–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Solgi, M., Bozorg-Haddad, O., Seifollahi-Aghmiuni, S., Ghasemi-Abiazani, P., & Lóaiciga, H. A. (2016). Optimal operation of water distribution networks under water shortage considering water quality. Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice, 7(3), 04016005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zavala, V. M. (2014). Stochastic optimal control model for natural gas networks. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 64, 103–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Afshar, M. H. & Rohani, M. (2009) Optimal operation of pipeline systems using genetic algorithm. In Evolutionary computation, 2009. CEC’09. IEEE congress on (pp. 1399–1405). IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gopalakrishnan, A., & Biegler, L. T. (2013). Economic nonlinear model predictive control for periodic optimal operation of gas pipeline networks. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 52, 90–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bagchi, A., Sprintson, A., Guikema, S., Bristow, E., & Brumbelow, K. (2010). Modeling performance of interdependent power and water networks during urban fire events. In Communication, control, and computing (Allerton), 2010 48th annual allerton conference on (pp. 1637–1644). IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Santhosh, A., Farid, A., Adegbege, A., & Youcef-Toumi, K. (2012). Simultaneous co-optimization for the economic dispatch of power and water networks. In Advances in power system control, operation and management (APSCOM 2012), 9th IET international conference on, Hong Kong, China. IET.

    Google Scholar 

  9. He, C., Wu, L., Liu, T., & Bie, Z. (2017). Robust co-optimization planning of interdependent electricity and natural gas systems with a joint n-1 and probabilistic reliability criterion. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 99, 1–1.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Homeland Security. (2013). Critical infrastructure security and resilience.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Water Distribution Systems. (2017). https://www.epa.gov/dwsixyearreview/drinking-water-distribution-systems

  12. Natural Gas Distribution. (2014). https://www.eversource.com/Content/ema-g/residential/safety/gas-safety-tips/gas-pipeline-safety%0A

  13. Bradley, H. (1977). Nonlinear programming. In Applied mathematical programming (pp. 419–464).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dutt, G. & Tanides, C. (1999). Hourly demand curves for residential end uses in Argentina and potential for load management. In Proceedings of l5eme. Congres International des Reseaux Electriques de Distribution.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gurung, T. R., Stewart, R. A., Beal, C. D., & Sharma, A. K. (2015). Smart meter enabled water end-use demand data: Platform for the enhanced infrastructure planning of contemporary urban water supply networks. Journal of Cleaner Production, 87, 642–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang, X., Che, L., Shahidehpour, M., Alabdulwahab, A., & Abusorrah, A. (2016). Electricity-natural gas operation planning with hourly demand response for deployment of flexible ramp. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 7(3), 996–1004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qing Hui .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Cheng, J., Liu, Q., Hui, Q., Choobineh, F. (2019). The Joint Optimization of Critical Interdependent Infrastructure of an Electricity-Water-Gas System. In: Adams, S., Beling, P., Lambert, J., Scherer, W., Fleming, C. (eds) Systems Engineering in Context. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00114-8_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation