Auditory Training in Tinnitus

  • Chapter
Textbook of Tinnitus

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 160.49
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
EUR 213.99
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

A1:

Primary auditory cortex

A2:

Secondary auditory cortex

ADT:

Auditory discrimination training

AOIL:

Auditory object identification and localization

ASSR:

Auditory steady-state response

EAE:

Enriched acoustic environment

LDL:

Loudness discomfort level

LM:

Loudness matching

MML:

Minimum masking level

QE:

Quiet environment

RI:

Residual inhibition

THI:

Tinnitus handicap inventory

THQ:

Tinnitus handicap questionnaire

TRQ:

Tinnitus reaction questionnaire

TRT:

Tinnitus retraining therapy

TSI:

Tinnitus severity index

VAS:

Visual analog scales

References

  1. Jastreboff PJ (1995) Tinnitus as a phantom perception: Theories and clinical applications. In: Vernon J, Moeller AR, Editors. Mechanisms of Tinnitus. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon, pp. 73–94.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Henry JA, MA Schechter, TL Zaugg et al (2006) Outcomes of clinical trial: Tinnitus masking versus tinnitus retraining therapy. J. Am. Acad. Audiol. 17:104–132.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Robertson D, DRF Irvine (1989) Plasticity of frequency organization in auditory cortex of guinea pigs with partial unilateral deafness. J. Comp. Neurol. 282:456–461.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Rajan R, DRF Irvine (1998) Neuronal responses across cortical field A1 in plasticity induced by peripheral auditory organ damage. Audiol. Neurootol. 3:123–144.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Noreña AJ, M Tomita, JJ Eggermont (2003) Neural changes in cat auditory cortex after a transient pure-tone trauma. J. Neurophysiol. 90:2387–2401.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rauschecker JP (1999) Auditory cortical plasticity: a ­comparison with other sensory systems. Trends Neurosci. 22:74–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Eggermont JJ, LE Roberts (2004) The neuroscience of ­tinnitus. Trends Neurosci. 27:676–682.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Fritz J, M Elhilali, S Shamma (2005) Active listening: task-dependent plasticity of spectrotemporal receptive fields in primary auditory cortex. Hear. Res. 206:159–176.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Weinberger NM (2007) Auditory associative memory and representational plasticity in the primary auditory cortex. Hear. Res. 229:54–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Finlayson PG, JA Kaltenbach (2009) Alterations in the spontaneous discharge patterns of single units in the dorsal cochlear nucleus following intense sound exposure. Hear. Res. doi:10.1016.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cacace AT (2003) Expanding the biological basis of tinnitus: crossmodal origins and the role of neuroplasticity. Hear. Res. 175:112–132.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Shore SE, S Koehler, M Oldakowski, LF Hughes, S Syed (2008) Dorsal cochlear nucleus responses to somatosensory stimulation are enhanced after noise-induced hearing loss. Eur. J. Neurosci. 27:155–168.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lanting CP, E de Kleine, P van Dijk (2009) Neural activity underlying tinnitus generation: Results from PET and fMRI. Hear. Res. 255:1–13.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Roberts LE, G Moffat, M Baumann et al (2008) Residual inhibition functions overlap tinnitus spectra and the region of auditory threshold shift. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 9: 417–435.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ross B, R Draganova, TW Picton, C Pantev (2003) Frequency specificity of 40-Hz auditory steady-state responses. Hear. Res. 186:57–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Pantev C, H Okamoto, B Ross, W Stoll, E Ciurlia-Guy, R Kakigi, T Kubo (2004) Lateral inhibition and habituation of the human auditory cortex. Eur. J. Neurosci. 19: 2337–2344.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kadia SC, X Wang (2003) Spectral integration in A1 of awake primates: neurons with single and multipeaked tuning characteristics. J Neurophysiol. 89:1603–1622.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Plewnia C, M Reimold, A Najib, B Brehm, G Reischl, SK Plontke, C Gerloff (2007) Dose-dependent attenuation of auditory phantom perception (tinnitus) by PET-guided repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Hum. Brain Mapp. 28:238–246.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Noreña AJ, S Chery-Croze (2007) Enriched acoustic environment rescales auditory sensitivity. NeuroReport 18:1251–1255

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Noreña A, C Micheyl, S Chéry-Croze, L Collet (2002) Psychoacoustic characterization of the tinnitus spectrum: implications for the underlying mechanisms of tinnitus. Audiol. Neurootol. 7:358–369.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kuk FK, RS Tyler, D Russell, H Jordan (1990) The psychometric properties of a tinnitus handicap questionnaire. Ear Hear. 11:434–445.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Meikle MB, SE Griest, BJ Stewart, LS Press (1995) Measuring the negative impact of tinnitus: A brief severity index. Abstr. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. p.167.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Newman CW, GP Jacobson, JB Spitzer (1996) Development of the tinnitus handicap inventory. Arch. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 122:143–148.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Wilson PH, J Henry, M Bowen, G Haralambous (1991) Tinnitus reaction questionnaire: psychometric properties of a measure of distress associated with tinnitus. J. Speech Hear. Res. 34:197–201.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Flor H, T Elbert, S Knecht, C Wienbruch, C Pantev, N Birbaumer et al (1995) Phantom limb pain as perceptual correlate of cortical reorganization. Nature 357:482–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Flor H, C Denke, M Schaefer, S Grusser (2001) Effect of sensory discrimination training on cortical reorganization and phantom limb pain. The Lancet 357:1763–1764.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Flor H, D Hoffmann, M Struve, E Diesch (2004) Auditory discrimination training for the treatment of tinnitus. Appl. Psychophysiol. Biofeedback 29(2):113–120.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Burns E (1984) A comparison of variability among measurements of subjective tinnitus and objective stimuli. Audiology 23:426–440.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Herriaz C, I Diges, P Cobo, G Plaza, J Aparicio (2006) Auditory discrimination therapy (ADT) for tinnitus management: preliminary results. Acta Oto-Laryngologica 126:8083.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Herriaz C, I Diges, P Cobo, J Aparicio (2009) Cortical reorganization and tinnitus: principles of auditory discrimination training for tinnitus management. Eur. Arch. Otorhino­laryngol. 266:9–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Roberts LE, DJ Bosnyak (2010) Neural synchrony and neural plasticity in tinnitus. In: Searchfield GD, Goodey R Editors. Proceedings of Tinnitus Discovery: Asia-Pacific Tinnitus Symposium. N. Z. Med. J. 123:39–50.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Bosnyak DJ, RA Eaton, LE Roberts (2004) Distributed auditory cortical representations are modified by training at pitch discrimination with 40-Hz amplitude modulated tones. Cereb. Cortex 14:1088–1099.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kilgard MP, PK Pandya, J Vazquez, A Gehi, CE Schreiner, MM Merzenich (2001) Sensory input directs spatial and temporal plasticity in primary auditory cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 86:326–338.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Searchfield G, J Morrison-Low, K Wise (2007) Object identification and attention training for treating tinnitus. Prog. Brain Res. 166:369–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Baguley D, M Atlas (2007) Cochlear implants and tinnitus. Prog. Brain Res. 166:369–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Folmer R, J Carroll (2006) Long-term effectiveness of ­ear-level devices for tinnitus. Otolaryng. Head Neck Surg. 134:132–137.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Moffat G, K Adjout, S Gallego, H Thai-Van, L Collet, A Norena (2009) Effects of hearing aid fitting on the perceptual characteristics of tinnitus. Hear. Res. 254:82–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Noreña A, JJ Eggermont (2005) Enriched acoustic environment after noise trauma reduces hearing loss and prevents cortical map reorganization. J. Neurosci. 25(3):699–705.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Noreña A, JJ Eggermont (2006) Enriched acoustic environment after noise trauma abolishes neural signs of tinnitus. Neuroreport 17(6):559–563.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Pienkowski M, JJ Eggermont (2009) Long-term, partially-reversible reorganization of frequency tuning in mature cat primary auditory cortex can be induced by passive exposure to moderate-level sounds. Hear. Res. 257:24–40.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Gander PE, DJ Bosnyak, LE Roberts (2010) Acoustic experience but not attention modifies neural population phase expressed in human primary auditory cortex. Hear. Res. doi:10.1016 (on-line ahead of print).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Ross B, K Tremblay (2009) Stimulus experience modifies auditory neuromagnetic responses in young and older listeners. Hear. Res. 248:48–59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Sheehan KA, GM McArthur, DV Bishop (2005) Is discrimination training necessary to cause changes in the P2 auditory event-related brain potential to speech sounds? Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 25:547–553.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Stanton SG, RV Harrison (1996) Abnormal cochleotopic organization in the auditory cortex of cats reared in a frequency augmented environment. Aud. Neurosci. 2:97–107.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Davis PB, B Paki, PJ Hanley (2007) Neuromonics tinnitus treatment: third clinical trial. Ear Hear. 28(2):242–259.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Davis PB, RA Wilde, LG Steed, PJ Hanley (2008) Treatment of tinnitus with a customized acoustic neural stimulus: a controlled clinical study. Ear Nose Throat J. 87:330–339.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Hanley PJ, PB Davis, B Paki, SA Quinn, SR Bellekom (2008) Treatment of tinnitus with a customized, dynamic acoustic neural stimulus: Clinical outcomes in general private practice. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 117:791–799.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Anari M, A Axelsson, A Eliasson, L Magnusson (1999) Hypersensitivity to sound – questionnaire data, audiometry and classification. Scand. Audiol. 28:219–230.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Formby C, LP Sherlock, SL Gold (2003) Adaptive plasticity of loudness induced by chronic attenuation and enhancement of the acoustic background. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 114:55–58.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Munro KJ, J Blount (2009) Adaptive plasticity in brainstem of adult listeners following earplug-induced deprivation. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 126:568–571.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Okamoto H, C Pantev, H Stracke, O Thiede (2009) Listening to tailor-made music reverses maladaptive auditory cortex reorganization and alleviates tinnitus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; doi:10.1073/pnas.0911268107.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Jepsen K, MP Sanders, GD Searchfield, K Kobayashi (2009) Perceptual training for tinnitus management. Tinnitus Discovery: Asia Pacific Tinnitus Symposium, Auckland, 11–12 September.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Guenther F, F Husain, M Cohen, B Shinn-Cunningham (1999) Effects of categorization and discrimination training on auditory perceptual space. JASA 106:2900–2912.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Guenther FH, A Nieto-Castanon, SS Ghosh, JA Tourville (2004) Representation of sound categories in auditory cortical maps. J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 47:46–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Preparation of this chapter was assisted by grants from the Canadian Institutes for Health Research, the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, the American Tinnitus Association, and the Tinnitus Research Initiative.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Larry E. Roberts .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Roberts, L.E., Bosnyak, D.J. (2011). Auditory Training in Tinnitus. In: Møller, A.R., Langguth, B., De Ridder, D., Kleinjung, T. (eds) Textbook of Tinnitus. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60761-145-5_72

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60761-145-5_72

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-60761-144-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-60761-145-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation