Response to Intervention and Accountability Systems

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Response to Intervention

Abstract

Response to intervention (RTI) for academics or behavior requires that data from multiple sources are collected and monitored to evaluate efficacy of interventions for individuals, groups of students, and whole school populations. An explosion of data sources for RTI and positive behavioral interventions and supports (PBIS) in recent years has allowed school teams to base educational decisions on multiple sets of reliable and valid data; however, with large quantities of available data comes the challenge of securely storing these data and retrieving them in an efficient manner. This process of data warehousing has led to the emergence of a number of commercial products aimed at storing data key to RTI and PBIS and providing teams with a range of reports and graphs to facilitate making informed, data-based decisions about instruction and interventions. A review of the data analysis teaming process along with common types of data used in the RTI/PBIS process is provided. Sample data warehousing products are offered with a review of their strengths and limitations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 269.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 349.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Algozzine, B., Horner, R. H., Sugai, G., Barrett, S., Dickey, S. R., Eber, L., & Tobin, T. (2010). Evaluation blueprint for school-wide positive behavior support. Eugene: National Technical Assistance Center on Positive Behavior Interventions and Support. www.pbis.org. Accessed 27 Feb 2015.

  • Anderson, N. A., Childs, K., Kincaid, D., Horner, R. H., George, H., Todd, A., & Spaulding, S. A. (2012). Benchmarks of advanced tiers v. 2.5. Unpublished instrument, Educational and Community Supports, University of Oregon, and University of South Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, D., Daly, E., Jones, K., & Lentz, F. E. (2004). Response to intervention: Empirically-based special service decisions for increasing and decreasing intensity using single case designs. The Journal of Special Education, 38, 66–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boneshefski, M. J., & Runge, T. J. (2014). Addressing disproportionate discipline practices within a schoolwide positive behavioral interventions and supports framework: A practical guide for calculating disproportionality rates. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 16, 149–158. doi:10.1177/1098300713484064.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw, C. P., Mitchell, M. M., & Leaf, P. J. (2010). Examining the effects of schoolwide positive behavioral interventions and supports on student outcomes: Results from a randomized controlled effectiveness trial in elementary schools. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 12, 133–149. doi:10.1177/1098300709334798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown-Chidsey, R., & Steege, M. W. (2005). Response to intervention: Principles and strategies for effective practice. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, M. K., Appleton, J. J., & Stehouwer, J. D. (2005). Meta-analytic review of responsiveness-to-intervention research: Examining field-based and research-implemented models. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 23, 381–394. doi:10.1177/073428290502300406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christ, T. J., Zopluoglu, C., Long, J. D., & Monaghen, B. D. (2012). Curriculum-based measurement of oral reading: Quality of progress monitoring outcomes. Exceptional Children, 78, 356–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christ, T. J., Zopluoglo, C., Monaghen, B. D., & Van Norman, E. R. (2013). Curriculum-based measurement of oral reading: Multi study evaluation of schedule, duration, and dataset quality on progress monitoring outcomes. Journal of School Psychology, 51(1), 19–57. (in press).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (2007). Applied behavior analysis (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crone, D. A., Hawken, L. S., & Horner, R. H. (2010). Responding to problem behavior in schools: The behavior education program (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duhon, G. J., Noell, G. H., Witt, J. C., Freeland, J. T., Dufrene, B. A., & Gilbertson, D. N. (2004). Identifying academic skill and performance deficits: The experimental analysis of brief assessments of academic skills. School Psychology Review, 33, 429–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eber, L., Phillips, D., Hyde, K., Breen, K., Rose, J., Lewandowski, H., & Upreti, G. (2010). Illinois positive behavior interventions & supports (PBIS) network: FY10 annual progress report. Springfield: Illinois PBIS Network. www.istac.net. Accessed 27 Feb 2015.

  • Educational and Community Supports. (2011). School-wide information system [On-line data-base]. Eugene: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, S. N., & Gresham, F. M. (2007). Social skills improvement system—Performance screening guide. San Antonio: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, L., Hemmeter, M. L., & Jack, S. (2010). Early childhood program-wide PBIS benchmarks of quality. Unpublished instrument, University of South Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, L. (2003). Assessing intervention responsiveness: Conceptual and technical issues. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 172–186. doi:10.1111/1540-5826.00073.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, L. S., & Deno, S. L. (1991). Paradigmatic distinctions between instructionally relevant measurement models. Exceptional Children, 57, 488–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gellert, A. S., & Elbro, C. (2013). Cloze tests may be quick, but are they dirty? Development and preliminary validation of a cloze test of reading comprehension. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 31, 16–28. doi:10.1177/0734282912451971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Good, R. H., Kaminski, R. A., Cummings, K., Dufour-Martel, C., Petersen, K., Powell-Smith, K., & Wallin, J. (2011). DIBELS Next. Eugene: Dynamic Measurement Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosp, J. L., & Reschly, D. J. (2003). Referral rates for intervention and assessment: A meta-analysis of racial differences. Journal of Special Education, 37, 67–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howe, K. B., Scierka, B. J., Gibbons, K. A., & Silberglitt, B. (2003). A school-wide organization system for raising reading achievement using general outcome measures and evidenced-based instruction: One education district’s experience. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 28, 59–72. doi:10.1177/073724770302800307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howell, K. W., & Nolet, V. (2000). Curriculum-based evaluation: Teaching and decision making (3rd ed.). Belmont: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Illinois PBIS Network. (2012). FY12: End of year report. Springfield: Author. http://www.istac.net. Accessed 27 Feb 2015.

  • Kamphaus, R. W., & Reynolds, C. R. (2007). Behavior assessment system for children—Second edition (BASC-2): Behavioral and emotional screening system. Bloomington: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, B. (2008). Curriculum-based evaluation in math. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Ed.), Best practices in school psychology V (pp. 419–438). Bethesda: National Association of School Psychologists.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kincaid, D., Childs, K., & George, H. (2005). School-wide benchmarks of quality. Unpublished instrument, University of South Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kovaleski, J. F., & Pedersen, J. (2008). Best practices in data analysis teaming. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology, V (Vol. 2, pp. 115–129). Bethesda: National Association of School Psychologists.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kovaleski, J. F., & Pedersen, J. A. (2014). Best practices in data-analysis teaming. In P. L. Harrison & A. Thomas (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology: Data-based and collaborative descision making, (pp. 99–120). Bethesda: National Association of School Psychologists.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kovaleski, J. F., VanDerHeyDen, A. M., & Shapiro, E. S. (2013). The rti approach to evaluating learning disabilities. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marston, D., Muyskens, P., Lau, M., & Canter A. (2003). Problem-solving model for decision making with high-incidence disabilities: The Minneapolis experience. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 187–200. doi:10.1111/1540-5826.00074.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Association of State Directors of Special Education. (2005). Response to intervention: Policy considerations and implementation. Alexandria: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Reading Panel. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read. Bethesda: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • NCS Pearson, Inc. (2011). AIMSweb. Austin: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Northwest Evaluation Association. (2004). Measures of academic progress. Lake Oswego: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renaissance Learning. (1996). STAR Reading. Wisconsin Rapids: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reschly, D. J., Tilly, W. D., & Grimes, J. (Eds.). (1999). Special education in transition: Functional assessment and noncategorical programming. Longmont: Sopris West.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runge, T. J., Staszkiewicz, M. J., & O’Donnell, K. H. (2012). 2010–2011 PAPBS network SWPBIS executive summary. Indiana: Indiana University of Pennsylvania. http://www.papbs.org. Accessed 27 Feb 2015.

  • Shinn, M. R. (1989). Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skiba, R. J., Michael, R. S., Nardo, A. C., & Peterson, R. L. (2002). The color of discipline: Sources of racial and gender disproportionality in school punishment. The Urban Review, 32, 317–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skiba, R. J., Horner, R. H., Chung, C., Rausch, M. K., May, S. L., & Tobin, T. (2011). Race is not neutral: A national investigation of African American and Latino disproportionality in school discipline. School Psychology Review, 40, 85–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spaulding, S. A., Irvin, L. K., Horner, R. H., May, S. L., Emeldi, M., Tobin, T. J., & Sugai, G. (2010). Schoolwide social-behavioral climate, student problem behavior, and related administrative decisions: Empirical patterns from 1,510 schools nationwide. Journal of Positive Behavior Intervention, 12, 69–85. doi:10.1177/1098300708329011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sprague, J., Colvin, G., & Irvin, L. (2002). The school safety survey version 2.0. Unpublished instrument, The Institute on Violence and Destructive Behavior.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steege, M. W., & Watson, T. S. (2009). Conducting school-based functional behavioral assessments (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, L H., & Silberglitt, B. (2008). Best practices in develo** academic local norms. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology V (pp. 225–242). Bethesda: National Association of School Psychologists.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugai, G., & Horner, R. H. (2009). Schoolwide positive behavior support. In W. Sailor, G. Sugai, G. Dunlap, & R. Horner (Eds.), Handbook of positive behavior support (pp. 307–326). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sugai, G., Lewis-Palmer, T., Todd, A. W., & Horner, R. H. (2005). School-wide evaluation tool version 2.1. Eugene: Educational and Community Supports.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugai, G., Horner, R. H., & Lewis-Palmer, T. (2009a). Effective behavior support: Team implementation checklist version 3.0. Eugene: Educational and Community Supports.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugai, G., Horner, R. H., & Todd, A. (2009b). Effective behavior support: Self-assessment survey version 3.0. Eugene: Educational and Community Supports.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, W. D., III. (2008). The evolution of school psychology to science-based practice: Problem-solving and the three-tiered model. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology, V (Vol. 1, pp. 17–36). Bethesda: National Association of School Psychologists.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todd, A. W., Horner, R. H., Newton, J. S., Algozzine, R. F., Algozzine, K. M., & Frank, J. L. (2011). Effects of team-initiated problem solving on decision making by schoolwide behavior support teams. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 27, 42–59. doi:10.1080/15377903.2011.540510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torgesen, J. K. (2002). The prevention of reading difficulties. Journal of School Psychology, 40, 7–26. doi:10.1016/S0022-4405(01)00092-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VanDerHeyden, A. M., Witt, J. C., & Naquin, G. (2003). The development and validation of a process for screening referrals to special education. School Psychology Review, 32, 204–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughn, S., & Fuchs, L. S. (2003). Redefining learning disabilities as inadequate response to instruction: The promise and potential pitfalls. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 137–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughn, S., Linan-Thompson, S., & Hickman, P. (2003). Response to instruction as a means of identifying students with reading/learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 69, 391–409.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Timothy J. Runge .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Runge, T., Lillenstein, D., Kovaleski, J. (2016). Response to Intervention and Accountability Systems. In: Jimerson, S., Burns, M., VanDerHeyden, A. (eds) Handbook of Response to Intervention. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7568-3_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation