Abstract
Response to intervention (RTI) for academics or behavior requires that data from multiple sources are collected and monitored to evaluate efficacy of interventions for individuals, groups of students, and whole school populations. An explosion of data sources for RTI and positive behavioral interventions and supports (PBIS) in recent years has allowed school teams to base educational decisions on multiple sets of reliable and valid data; however, with large quantities of available data comes the challenge of securely storing these data and retrieving them in an efficient manner. This process of data warehousing has led to the emergence of a number of commercial products aimed at storing data key to RTI and PBIS and providing teams with a range of reports and graphs to facilitate making informed, data-based decisions about instruction and interventions. A review of the data analysis teaming process along with common types of data used in the RTI/PBIS process is provided. Sample data warehousing products are offered with a review of their strengths and limitations.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Algozzine, B., Horner, R. H., Sugai, G., Barrett, S., Dickey, S. R., Eber, L., & Tobin, T. (2010). Evaluation blueprint for school-wide positive behavior support. Eugene: National Technical Assistance Center on Positive Behavior Interventions and Support. www.pbis.org. Accessed 27 Feb 2015.
Anderson, N. A., Childs, K., Kincaid, D., Horner, R. H., George, H., Todd, A., & Spaulding, S. A. (2012). Benchmarks of advanced tiers v. 2.5. Unpublished instrument, Educational and Community Supports, University of Oregon, and University of South Florida.
Barnett, D., Daly, E., Jones, K., & Lentz, F. E. (2004). Response to intervention: Empirically-based special service decisions for increasing and decreasing intensity using single case designs. The Journal of Special Education, 38, 66–79.
Boneshefski, M. J., & Runge, T. J. (2014). Addressing disproportionate discipline practices within a schoolwide positive behavioral interventions and supports framework: A practical guide for calculating disproportionality rates. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 16, 149–158. doi:10.1177/1098300713484064.
Bradshaw, C. P., Mitchell, M. M., & Leaf, P. J. (2010). Examining the effects of schoolwide positive behavioral interventions and supports on student outcomes: Results from a randomized controlled effectiveness trial in elementary schools. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 12, 133–149. doi:10.1177/1098300709334798.
Brown-Chidsey, R., & Steege, M. W. (2005). Response to intervention: Principles and strategies for effective practice. New York: Guilford Press.
Burns, M. K., Appleton, J. J., & Stehouwer, J. D. (2005). Meta-analytic review of responsiveness-to-intervention research: Examining field-based and research-implemented models. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 23, 381–394. doi:10.1177/073428290502300406.
Christ, T. J., Zopluoglu, C., Long, J. D., & Monaghen, B. D. (2012). Curriculum-based measurement of oral reading: Quality of progress monitoring outcomes. Exceptional Children, 78, 356–373.
Christ, T. J., Zopluoglo, C., Monaghen, B. D., & Van Norman, E. R. (2013). Curriculum-based measurement of oral reading: Multi study evaluation of schedule, duration, and dataset quality on progress monitoring outcomes. Journal of School Psychology, 51(1), 19–57. (in press).
Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (2007). Applied behavior analysis (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Crone, D. A., Hawken, L. S., & Horner, R. H. (2010). Responding to problem behavior in schools: The behavior education program (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
Duhon, G. J., Noell, G. H., Witt, J. C., Freeland, J. T., Dufrene, B. A., & Gilbertson, D. N. (2004). Identifying academic skill and performance deficits: The experimental analysis of brief assessments of academic skills. School Psychology Review, 33, 429–443.
Eber, L., Phillips, D., Hyde, K., Breen, K., Rose, J., Lewandowski, H., & Upreti, G. (2010). Illinois positive behavior interventions & supports (PBIS) network: FY10 annual progress report. Springfield: Illinois PBIS Network. www.istac.net. Accessed 27 Feb 2015.
Educational and Community Supports. (2011). School-wide information system [On-line data-base]. Eugene: Author.
Elliott, S. N., & Gresham, F. M. (2007). Social skills improvement system—Performance screening guide. San Antonio: Pearson.
Fox, L., Hemmeter, M. L., & Jack, S. (2010). Early childhood program-wide PBIS benchmarks of quality. Unpublished instrument, University of South Florida.
Fuchs, L. (2003). Assessing intervention responsiveness: Conceptual and technical issues. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 172–186. doi:10.1111/1540-5826.00073.
Fuchs, L. S., & Deno, S. L. (1991). Paradigmatic distinctions between instructionally relevant measurement models. Exceptional Children, 57, 488–500.
Gellert, A. S., & Elbro, C. (2013). Cloze tests may be quick, but are they dirty? Development and preliminary validation of a cloze test of reading comprehension. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 31, 16–28. doi:10.1177/0734282912451971.
Good, R. H., Kaminski, R. A., Cummings, K., Dufour-Martel, C., Petersen, K., Powell-Smith, K., & Wallin, J. (2011). DIBELS Next. Eugene: Dynamic Measurement Group.
Hosp, J. L., & Reschly, D. J. (2003). Referral rates for intervention and assessment: A meta-analysis of racial differences. Journal of Special Education, 37, 67–81.
Howe, K. B., Scierka, B. J., Gibbons, K. A., & Silberglitt, B. (2003). A school-wide organization system for raising reading achievement using general outcome measures and evidenced-based instruction: One education district’s experience. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 28, 59–72. doi:10.1177/073724770302800307.
Howell, K. W., & Nolet, V. (2000). Curriculum-based evaluation: Teaching and decision making (3rd ed.). Belmont: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
Illinois PBIS Network. (2012). FY12: End of year report. Springfield: Author. http://www.istac.net. Accessed 27 Feb 2015.
Kamphaus, R. W., & Reynolds, C. R. (2007). Behavior assessment system for children—Second edition (BASC-2): Behavioral and emotional screening system. Bloomington: Pearson.
Kelley, B. (2008). Curriculum-based evaluation in math. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Ed.), Best practices in school psychology V (pp. 419–438). Bethesda: National Association of School Psychologists.
Kincaid, D., Childs, K., & George, H. (2005). School-wide benchmarks of quality. Unpublished instrument, University of South Florida.
Kovaleski, J. F., & Pedersen, J. (2008). Best practices in data analysis teaming. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology, V (Vol. 2, pp. 115–129). Bethesda: National Association of School Psychologists.
Kovaleski, J. F., & Pedersen, J. A. (2014). Best practices in data-analysis teaming. In P. L. Harrison & A. Thomas (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology: Data-based and collaborative descision making, (pp. 99–120). Bethesda: National Association of School Psychologists.
Kovaleski, J. F., VanDerHeyDen, A. M., & Shapiro, E. S. (2013). The rti approach to evaluating learning disabilities. New York: Guilford Press.
Marston, D., Muyskens, P., Lau, M., & Canter A. (2003). Problem-solving model for decision making with high-incidence disabilities: The Minneapolis experience. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 187–200. doi:10.1111/1540-5826.00074.
National Association of State Directors of Special Education. (2005). Response to intervention: Policy considerations and implementation. Alexandria: Author.
National Reading Panel. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read. Bethesda: Author.
NCS Pearson, Inc. (2011). AIMSweb. Austin: Author.
Northwest Evaluation Association. (2004). Measures of academic progress. Lake Oswego: Author.
Renaissance Learning. (1996). STAR Reading. Wisconsin Rapids: Author.
Reschly, D. J., Tilly, W. D., & Grimes, J. (Eds.). (1999). Special education in transition: Functional assessment and noncategorical programming. Longmont: Sopris West.
Runge, T. J., Staszkiewicz, M. J., & O’Donnell, K. H. (2012). 2010–2011 PAPBS network SWPBIS executive summary. Indiana: Indiana University of Pennsylvania. http://www.papbs.org. Accessed 27 Feb 2015.
Shinn, M. R. (1989). Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children. New York: Guilford Press.
Skiba, R. J., Michael, R. S., Nardo, A. C., & Peterson, R. L. (2002). The color of discipline: Sources of racial and gender disproportionality in school punishment. The Urban Review, 32, 317–342.
Skiba, R. J., Horner, R. H., Chung, C., Rausch, M. K., May, S. L., & Tobin, T. (2011). Race is not neutral: A national investigation of African American and Latino disproportionality in school discipline. School Psychology Review, 40, 85–107.
Spaulding, S. A., Irvin, L. K., Horner, R. H., May, S. L., Emeldi, M., Tobin, T. J., & Sugai, G. (2010). Schoolwide social-behavioral climate, student problem behavior, and related administrative decisions: Empirical patterns from 1,510 schools nationwide. Journal of Positive Behavior Intervention, 12, 69–85. doi:10.1177/1098300708329011.
Sprague, J., Colvin, G., & Irvin, L. (2002). The school safety survey version 2.0. Unpublished instrument, The Institute on Violence and Destructive Behavior.
Steege, M. W., & Watson, T. S. (2009). Conducting school-based functional behavioral assessments (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
Stewart, L H., & Silberglitt, B. (2008). Best practices in develo** academic local norms. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology V (pp. 225–242). Bethesda: National Association of School Psychologists.
Sugai, G., & Horner, R. H. (2009). Schoolwide positive behavior support. In W. Sailor, G. Sugai, G. Dunlap, & R. Horner (Eds.), Handbook of positive behavior support (pp. 307–326). New York: Springer.
Sugai, G., Lewis-Palmer, T., Todd, A. W., & Horner, R. H. (2005). School-wide evaluation tool version 2.1. Eugene: Educational and Community Supports.
Sugai, G., Horner, R. H., & Lewis-Palmer, T. (2009a). Effective behavior support: Team implementation checklist version 3.0. Eugene: Educational and Community Supports.
Sugai, G., Horner, R. H., & Todd, A. (2009b). Effective behavior support: Self-assessment survey version 3.0. Eugene: Educational and Community Supports.
Tilly, W. D., III. (2008). The evolution of school psychology to science-based practice: Problem-solving and the three-tiered model. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology, V (Vol. 1, pp. 17–36). Bethesda: National Association of School Psychologists.
Todd, A. W., Horner, R. H., Newton, J. S., Algozzine, R. F., Algozzine, K. M., & Frank, J. L. (2011). Effects of team-initiated problem solving on decision making by schoolwide behavior support teams. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 27, 42–59. doi:10.1080/15377903.2011.540510.
Torgesen, J. K. (2002). The prevention of reading difficulties. Journal of School Psychology, 40, 7–26. doi:10.1016/S0022-4405(01)00092-9.
VanDerHeyden, A. M., Witt, J. C., & Naquin, G. (2003). The development and validation of a process for screening referrals to special education. School Psychology Review, 32, 204–227.
Vaughn, S., & Fuchs, L. S. (2003). Redefining learning disabilities as inadequate response to instruction: The promise and potential pitfalls. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 137–146.
Vaughn, S., Linan-Thompson, S., & Hickman, P. (2003). Response to instruction as a means of identifying students with reading/learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 69, 391–409.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Runge, T., Lillenstein, D., Kovaleski, J. (2016). Response to Intervention and Accountability Systems. In: Jimerson, S., Burns, M., VanDerHeyden, A. (eds) Handbook of Response to Intervention. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7568-3_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7568-3_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-7567-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-7568-3
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)