Race and the Jury

  • Chapter
Race and the Jury

Abstract

The jury is one of our most democratic institutions. A random sample of the community is asked to render an impartial verdict in a case after hearing evidence from both sides. The notion that ordinary men and women of good will can and will exercise good judgment is basic to our tradition of government by the people. Furthermore, a jury’s verdict is assumed to reflect the collective sentiments and conscience of the community and therefore carries a legitimacy that cannot be attained by experts, no matter how intelligent and skillful they may be.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

eBook
USD 9.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. See Alker, Hosticka, and Mitchell (1976); Brady (1983); Carp (1982); Chevigny (1975); De Card (1974); Diamond (1980); Finkelstein (1966); Fukurai and Butler (1987, 1991, 1992a, 1992b); Hans and Vidmar (1986); Heyns (1979); Kairys (1972); Kairys, Kadane, and Lehoczky (1977); Mills (1969); Robinson (1950); Staples (1975); Summers (1961, pp. 35-42); U.S. 90th Congress Senate Report No. 891 (1967); and U.S. 90th Congress House Report No. 1076 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  2. For various court trials in the Federal Supreme Court, see Alexander v. Louisiana (405 U.S. 625 1972); Peters v. Kiff (407 U.S. 493 1972); Taylor v. Louisiana (419 U.S. 522 1975); Duren v. Missouri (439 U.S. 357 1979); City of Mobile, Ala. v. Bolden (466 U.S. 55 1980). In California, see People v. White (43 Cal. 3d 740 1954), People v. Newton (8 Cal. App. 3d 359, 87 Cal. Rptr. 294 1970); People v. Breckenridge (52 Cal. App. 3d. 913, 125 Cal. Rptr. 425 1975); People v. Lewis (74 Cal. App. 3d. 633, 141 Cal. Rptr. 614 1977); People v. King (49 Cal. Rptr. 562, 1966); People v. Sirhan (7 Cal. 3d 258 1978); People v. Wheeler (148 Cal. Rptr. 890 1978); People v. Estrada (155 Cal. Rptr. 731 1979); People v. Grahm (160 Cal. Rptr. 10 1979); and People v. Harris (36 Cal. 3d 36, 201, Cal. Rptr. 782 679 P. 2d 433 1984).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fukurai, H., Butler, E.W., Krooth, R. (1993). Race and the Jury. In: Race and the Jury. The Plenum Series in Crime and Justice. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-1127-8_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-1127-8_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-1129-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-1127-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation