Constraints Placed by Predators on Feeding Behaviour

  • Chapter
The Behaviour of Teleost Fishes

Abstract

Teleost fish are frequently in danger of being preyed upon. Predators of many taxa are specialised piscivores and there are more of them that attack small fish. Therefore, young fish normally live under a high risk of predation, which decreases as they grow older and bigger. Growing fast is not only a good strategy for esca** the prey spectrum of many predators, but also for increasing reproductive success; bigger teleosts are generally able to produce more numerous offspring than smaller ones because bigger females produce more eggs, and bigger males can defend breeding sites better and have a higher social rank; for example, dominant male threespined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus) maintain larger territories and have priority of access to females (Li and Owings 1978). Thus, there is a high selection pressure to feed most efficiently in order to grow quickly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

eBook
USD 9.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arme, C. and Owen, R.W. (1967) `Infections of the Three-spined Stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus L., with the Plerocercoid larvae of Schistocephalus solidus (Willer 1776), with Special Reference to Pathological Effects’, Parasitology, 57, 301–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cerri, R.D. and Fraser, D.F. (1983) `Predation and Risk in Foraging Minnows: Balancing Conflicting Demands’, American Naturalist, 121, 552–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowden, A.E. and Broom, D.M. (1980) `Effects of the Eyefluke, Diplostomum spathaceum, on the Behaviour of Dace (Leuciscus leuciscus)’, Animal Behaviour, 28, 287–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Dill, L.M. (1983) `Adaptive Flexibility in the Foraging Behaviour of Fishes’, Canadian Journal of Fishery and Aquatic Sciences, 40, 398–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dill, L.M. and Fraser, A.H.G. (1984) `Risk of Predation and the Feeding Behaviour of Juvenile Coho Salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch)’, Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology, 16,65–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Giles, N. (1983) `Behavioural Effects of the Parasite Schistocephalus solidus (Cestoda) on an Intermediate Host, the Three-spined Stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus L’, Animal Behaviour, 31, 1192–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilliam, J.F. (1982) `Habitat Use and Competitive Bottlenecks in Size-structured FishPopulations’, unpublished PhD dissertation, Michigan State University, East Lansing Heller, R. and Milinski, M. (1979) `Optimal Foraging of Sticklebacks on Swarming Prey’,Animal Behaviour, 27, 1127–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Janetos, A.C. and Cole, B.J. (1981) `Imperfectly Optimal Animals’, Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology, 9, 203–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, J. (1976) `Feeding Modes and Prey Size Selection in the Alewife (Alosa pseudoharengus)’, Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 33, 1972–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Kniprath, E. (1965) ‘Stichlinge als Nahrung des Eisvogels and des Teichhuhns’, Ornithologischer Beobachter, 62, 190–2

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs, J.R. (1980) `Optimal Foraging, Predation Risk and Territory Defence’, Ardea, 68, 83–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs, J.R., Stephens, D.W. and Sutherland, W.J. (1983) `Perspectives in Optimal Foraging’, Perspectives in Ornithology, Essays Presented for the Centennial of the American Ornithologists’ Union, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 165–221

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, J. (1979) `The Early Warning Function of Flocking in Birds: an Experimental Study with Captive Quelea’, Animal Behaviour, 27, 855–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Lester, R.J.G. (1971) `The Influence of Schistocephalus Plerocercoids on the Respiration of Gasterosteus and a Possible Resulting Effect on the Behavior of the Fish’, Canadian Journal of Zoology, 49, 361–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, S.K. and Owings, D.H. (1978) `Sexual Selection in the Three-spined Stickleback. I. Normative Observations’, Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, 46, 359–71

    Google Scholar 

  • McCleery, R.H. (1978) `Optimal Behaviour Sequences and Decision Making’, in J.R. Krebs and N.B. Davies (eds), Behavioural Ecology: an Evolutionary Approach, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 337–410

    Google Scholar 

  • McNaught, D.C. and Hasler, A.D. (1961) `Surface Schooling and Feeding Behavior in the White Bass, Roccus chrysops (Rafinesque), in Lake Mendota’, Limnology and Oceanography, 6, 53–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magurran, A.E., Ou1ton, W.J. and Pitcher, T.J. (1985) `Vigilant Behaviour and Shoal Size in Minnows’, Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, 67, 167–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milinski, M. (1977a) `Experiments on the Selection by Predators against Spatial Oddity of their Prey’, Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, 43, 311–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milinski, M. (1977b) `Do All Members of a Swarm Suffer the Same Predation?’, Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, 45, 373–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milinski, M. (1984a) `A Predator’s Costs of Overcoming the Confusion Effect of Swarming Prey’, Animal Behaviour, 32, 1157–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milinski, M. (1984b) `Parasites Determine a Predator’s Optimal Feeding Strategy’, Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology, 15, 35–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milinski, M. (1985) `Risk of Predation Taken by Parasitised Sticklebacks under Competition for Food’, Behaviour, 93, 203–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milinski, M. and Heller, R. (1978) `Influence of a Predator on the Optimal Foraging Behaviour of Sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus L.)’, Nature, London, 275, 642–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohguchi, O. (1981) `Prey Density and Selection against Oddity by Three-spined Sticklebacks’, Supplement No. 23 to Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, G.V.N. (1974) `Experimental Analysis of the Social Value of Flocking by Starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) in Relation to Predation and Foraging’, Animal Behaviour, 22, 501–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Power, M.E. (1984) `Depth Distributions of Armored Catfish: Predator-induced Resource Avoidance’, Ecology, 65, 523–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobben, W.H. (1952) `The Food of the Cormorants in The Netherlands’, Ardea, 40, 1–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, E.E., Gilliam, J.F., Hall, D.J., and Mittelbach, G.G. (1983) ‘An Experimental Test of the Effects of Predation Risk on Habitat Use in Fish’, Ecology, 64, 1540–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wootton, R.J. (1976) The Biology of the Sticklebacks, Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1986 Tony J. Pitcher

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Milinski, M. (1986). Constraints Placed by Predators on Feeding Behaviour. In: Pitcher, T.J. (eds) The Behaviour of Teleost Fishes. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-8261-4_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-8261-4_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-8263-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-8261-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation