Abdominal Imaging

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Clinician's Guide to Diagnostic Imaging

Abstract

Diseases of the abdomen and pelvis can have a bewildering array of clinical presentations as a result of pathological conditions involving either the gastrointestinal (GI) or the genitourinary (GU) system. The diagnosis and management of these patients therefore is often clinically challenging and can represent an enigma despite or perhaps because of the availability of numerous laboratory investigations. The introduction of imaging has opened new methods to evaluate patients presenting with diseases of the abdomen and pelvis. Imaging provides a unique inside view of the abdomen, and it frequently aids a treating physician in unraveling its complex mysteries. The explosion of various imaging modalities over the past century, ranging from plain radiography to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), has revolutionized diagnosis and follow-up of patients with various types of pathology in the abdomen and pelvis. Continued advancements in the past few decades, particularly in cross-sectional imaging modalities such as multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) and MRI, have made imaging an integral tool in patient diagnosis and management. Indeed, an ultrasound (US) or CT scan is often among the initial investigations performed in a patient presenting to the emergency room with abdominal complaints. Despite their immense benefits, judicious use of imaging techniques is imperative, not only to avoid excessive economic burden on our healthcare system, but also to prevent unnecessary exposure to ionizing radiation with techniques such as fluoroscopy or CT scans (Table 5.1). In this chapter, our aim is to provide an overview of the various imaging techniques available in the interrogation of patients with signs and symptoms related to the abdomen and pelvis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 53.49
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
EUR 69.54
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Campani R, Bottinelli O, Calliada F, Coscia D. The latest in ultrasound: three-dimensional imaging. Part II. Eur J Radiol. 1998;27 Suppl 2:S183–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Harvey CJ, Pilcher JM, Eckersley RJ, Blomley MJ, Cosgrove DO. Advances in ultrasound. Clin Radiol. 2002;57:157–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Leschka S, Alkadhi H, Wildermuth S, Marincek B. Multi-detector computed tomography of acute abdomen. Eur Radiol. 2005;15:2435–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kocher KE, Meurer WJ, Fazel R, Scott PA, Krumholz HM, Nallamothu BK. National trends in use of computed tomography in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 2011;58:452–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cartwright SL, Knudson MP. Evaluation of acute abdominal pain in adults. Am Fam Physician. 2008;77:971–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Shuman WP, Ralls PW, Balfe DM, et al. Imaging evaluation of patients with acute abdominal pain and fever. American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria. Radiology. 2000;215(Suppl):209–12.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bree RL, Ralls PW, Balfe DM, et al. Evaluation of patients with acute right upper quadrant pain. American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria. Radiology. 2000;215(Suppl):153–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hanbidge AE, Buckler PM, O’Malley ME, Wilson SR. From the RSNA refresher courses: imaging evaluation for acute pain in the right upper quadrant. Radiographics. 2004;24:1117–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Spence SC, Teichgraeber D, Chandrasekhar C. Emergent right upper quadrant sonography. J Ultrasound Med. 2009;28:479–96.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ralls PW, Balfe DM, Bree RL, et al. Evaluation of acute right lower quadrant pain. American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria. Radiology. 2000;215(Suppl):159–66.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hammond NA, Nikolaidis P, Miller FH. Left lower-quadrant pain: guidelines from the American College of Radiology appropriateness criteria. Am Fam Physician. 2010;82:766–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. van der Molen AJ, Hovius M. Hematuria: a problem-based imaging algorithm illustrating the recent Dutch guidelines on hematuria. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;198(6):1256–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Newhouse JH, Amis Jr ES, Bigongiari LR, et al. Radiologic investigation of patients with hematuria. American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria. Radiology. 2000;215(Suppl):687–91.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Royal SA, Slovis TL, Kushner DC, et al. Hematuria. American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria. Radiology. 2000;215(Suppl):841–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lang EK, Thomas R, Davis R, et al. Multiphasic helical computerized tomography for the assessment of microscopic hematuria: a prospective study. J Urol. 2004;171:237–43.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bohm-Velez M, Mendelson E, Bree R, et al. Suspected adnexal masses. American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria. Radiology. 2000;215(Suppl):931–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Asrani A, Morani AK, Colen RR. Imaging of scrotum. In: Sahani D, Samir A, editors. Abdominal imaging. 1st ed. Maryland, Missouri: Saunders Elsevier; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  18. de Bombal F. Diagnosis of acute abdominal pain. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gore RM, Miller FH, Pereles FS, Yaghmai V, Berlin JW. Helical CT in the evaluation of the acute abdomen. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;174:901–13.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dushyant Sahani M.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bajpai, S., Sahani, D. (2014). Abdominal Imaging. In: Reinus, W. (eds) Clinician's Guide to Diagnostic Imaging. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8769-2_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8769-2_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-8768-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-8769-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation