Abstract
During the last decade, school shootings throughout the world have established the need for preventive measures, especially in North America and Europe where most cases occurred. Prevention strategies should base on scientific research that recognizes the difficulties of identifying reliable warning signs and risk factors for a low base rate phenomenon. Universal preventive measures aim to reduce risk in unselected populations (e.g., reduce bullying); indicated prevention measures use more immediate indicators, such as threats of violence and leaking, to identify persons at risk of committing an offense (i.e., threat assessment). Even with good prevention programs in place, schools need crisis response plans enabling them to react quickly and minimize harm in the event of a violent attack (i.e., limiting access to schools). We identify general difficulties of preventing school shootings and review different prevention and intervention strategies, highlighting some of the most promising approaches in the United States and Germany.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Psychological Association. (1999). Warning signs of youth violence. Retrieved January 22, 2011, from http://www.apa.org/helpcenter/warning-signs.aspx.
American Psychological Association Zero Tolerance Task Force. (2008). Are zero tolerance policies effective in the schools? An evidentiary review and recommendations. American Psychologist, 63, 852–862. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.63.9.852.
Bondü, R. (2012). School shootings in Deutschland: Internationaler Vergleich, Warnsignale, Risikofaktoren, Entwicklungsmodelle [School shootings in Germany. International comparison, warning signs, risk factors, and developmental models]. Retrieved September 27, 2012, from http://www.diss.fu-berlin.de/diss/receive/FUDISS_thesis_000000037683.
Bondü, R., Cornell, D. W., & Scheithauer, H. (2011). Student homicidal violence in schools: An international problem. New Directions for Youth Development, 129, 13–30. doi:10.1002/yd.384.
Bondü, R., Leuschner, V., Lippok, A., Scholl, J., & Scheithauer, H. (2012). Leaking-Phänomene und Ankündigungen von Gewalt—ihr Nutzen für die Prävention von schwerer, zielgerichteter Gewalt an Schulen. Befunde aus dem Berliner Leaking-Projekt und dem Projekt NETWASS [Leaking and announcements of violene – their use for prevention of severe targeted violence in schools. Results from the Berlin Leaking-Project and the project NETWASS]. In J. Hoffmann & K. Roshdi (Eds.), Schwere Schulgewalt, Jugend- und Erwachsenenamok—Täterpsychologie—Psychiatrische Aspekte—Risikoanalyse—Bedrohungsmanagement. Stuttgart: Schattauer (in press).
Bondü, R., & Scheithauer, H. (2009). Aktuelle Ansätze zur Prävention von School Shootings in Deutschland. Praxis der Kinderpsychologie und Kinderpsychiatrie, 58, 685–701.
Bondü, R., & Scheithauer, H. (2010). Explaining and preventing school shootings: Chances and difficulties of control. In W. Heitmeyer, H. G. Haupt, S. Malthaner, & A. Kirschner (Eds.), Control of violence: Historical and international perspectives on violence in modern societies (pp. 295–314). New York: Springer.
Bondü, R., & Scheithauer, H. (2012). Violent media consumption in German school shooters. In G. Muschert & J. Sumiala (Eds.), Mediatized violence in a global age. Chicago: Emerald (in press).
Borum, R., Bartel, P., & Forth, A. (2002). Manual for the Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY). Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Borum, R., Cornell, D., Modzeleski, W., & Jimerson, S. R. (2010). What can be done about school shootings? A review of the evidence. Educational Researcher, 39, 27–37. doi:10.3102/0013189X09357620.
Butcher, J. N., Perry, J. N., & Atlis, M. M. (2000). Validity and utility of computer-based test interpretation. Psychological Assessment, 12, 6–18.
Chagnon, F., Houle, J., Marcoux, I., & Renaud, J. (2007). Control-group study of an intervention training program for youth suicide prevention. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 37, 135–144.
Cornell, D., & Sheras, P. (2006). Guidelines for responding to student threats of violence. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
Cornell, D., Allen, K., & Fan, X. (2012). A randomized controlled study of the Virginia Student Threat Assessment Guidelines in grades K-12. School Psychology Review, 41, 100–115.
Cornell, D., Sheras, P., Gregory, A., & Fan, X. (2009). A retrospective study of school safety conditions in high schools using the Virginia Threat Assessment Guidelines versus alternative approaches. School Psychology Quarterly, 24, 119–129.
Cornell, D., et al. (2004). Guidelines for student threat assessment: Field-test findings. School Psychology Review, 33, 527–546.
Cornell, D., Gregory, A., & Fan, X. (2011). Reductions in long-term suspensions following adoption of the Virginia Student Threat Assessment Guidelines. Bulletin of the National Association of Secondary School Principals, 20, 1–20. doi:10.1177/0192636511415255.
De Becker, G. (n.d.). Gavin de Becker explains MOSAIC. Retrieved November 11, 2011, from https://www.mosaicmethod.com/.
Dill, K., Redding, R., Smith, P., Surette, R., & Cornell, D. (2011). Recurrent issues in efforts to prevent homicidal youth violence in schools: Expert opinions. New Directions for Youth Development, 129, 113–128. doi:10.1002/yd.391.
Dwyer, K., & Osher, D. (2000). Safeguarding our children: An action guide. Washington, DC: US Departments of Education and Justice, American Institutes for Research.
Dwyer, K., Osher, D., & Warger, C. (1998). Early warning, timely response: A guide to safe schools. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
Eliot, M., Cornell, D., Gregory, A., & Fan, X. (2010). Supportive school climate and student willingness to seek help for bullying and threats of violence. Journal of School Psychology, 48, 533–553.
Expertenkreis Amok. (2009). Gemeinsam Handeln: Risiken erkennen und minimieren: Prävention: Intervention: Opferhilfe: Medien: Konsequenzen aus dem Amoklauf in Winnenden und Wendlingen am 11. März 2009. Stuttgart: Author.
Fein, R. A., Vossekuil, B., Pollack, W. S., Borum, R., Modzeleski, W., & Reddy, M. (2002). Threat assessment in schools: A guide to managing threatening situations and creating safe school climates. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Elementary and Secondary Education, Safe and Drug-Free Schools Program/U.S. Secret Service, National Threat Assessment Center.
Ferguson, C. J. (2011). Video games and youth violence: A prospective analysis in adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 40, 377–391. doi:10.1007/s10964-010-9610-x.
Ferguson, C. J., & Kilburn, J. (2010). Much ado about nothing: The misestimation and overinterpretation of violent video game effects in Eastern and Western nations: Comment on Anderson et al. (2010). Psychological Bulletin, 136, 174–178. doi:10.1037/a0018566.
Graham, J., Shirm, S., Liggin, R., Aitken, M. E., & Dick, R. (2006). Mass-casualty events at schools: A national preparedness survey. Pediatrics, 117, e8–e15. doi:10.1542/peds.2005-0927.
Harding, D. J., Fox, C., & Mehta, J. D. (2002). Studying rare events through qualitative case studies: Lessons from a study of rampage school shootings. Sociological Methods Research, 31, 174–217. doi:10.1177/0049124102031002003.
Iannotti, R. J., Nansel, T. R., & Haynie, D. L. (2007). Adolescent bullying involvement and perceived family, peer and school relations: Commonalities and differences across race/ethnicity. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41, 283–293. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.04.009.
Juvonen, J. (2002). School violence: Prevalence, fears, and prevention (RAND Issue Paper). Retrieved April, 19, 2009, from http://www.rand.org/pubs/issue_papers/IP219/index2.html.
Klein, J. S. (2002). High-profile school shootings: How violence is hidden in masculinity expectations. Ann Arbor: ProQuest.
Kobe, S. (2009). Statistik seltener Ereignisse: Über die Effizienz von Präventivmaßnahmen zur Verringerung des Restrisikos von “school shooting”-Attentaten nach Winnenden aus mathematischer Sicht. [Statistics of seldom incidents: On the efficacy of prevention measures for the risk-reduction of school shootings from a mathematical perspective]. Forum Kriminalprävention, 7, 7–9.
Kostinsky, S., Bixlwer, E., & Kettl, P. (2001). Threats of school violence in Pennsylvania after media coverage of the Columbine High School massacre. Archives of Pediatric & Adolescent Medicine, 155, 994–1001.
Lange, T., & Greve, W. (2002). Amoklauf in der Schule—Allgemeine Überlegungen aus speziellem Anlass [Rampage at school—general thoughts for a special reason]. Soziale Probleme, 13, 80–101.
Leuschner, V., Bondü, R., Schroer-Hippel, M., Panno, J., Neumetzler, K., Fisch, S., et al. (2011). Prevention of homicidal violence in schools in Germany: The Berlin Leaking Project and the Networks Against School Shootings Project (NETWASS). New Directions for Youth Development, 129, 61–78. doi:10.1002/yd.
Medienpädagogischer Forschungsverbund Südwest (Eds.). (2010). JIM 2010: Jugend, Information (Multi-)Media: Basisstudie zum Medienumgang 12-bis 19-Jähriger in Deutschland [Youth, information (multi-)media: Basic study on media use of 12- to 19-year-olds in Germany]. Stuttgart: Author.
Mishna, F. (2008). An overview of the evidence of bullying prevention and intervention programs. Brief treatment and crisis intervention, 8, 327–341. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/brief-treatment/mhn020.
Mulvey, E. P., & Cauffman, E. (2001). The inherent limits of predicting school violence. American Psychologist, 56, 797–802.
Muschert, G. W., & Larkin, R. W. (2007). The Columbine High School shootings. In F. Bailey & S. Chermak (Eds.), Crimes and trials of the century (pp. 253–266). Westport: Praeger.
O’Toole, M. E. (2000). The school shooter: A threat assessment perspective. Quantico, VA: National Center for the Analysis of Violent Crime, Federal Bureau of Investigation.
Payne, S. R. T., & Elliot, D. S. (2011). Safe2Tell®: An anonymous, 24/7 reporting system for preventing school violence. New Directions for Youth Development, 129, 103–111. doi:10.1002/yd.390.
Plener, P. L., Libal, G., Keller, F., Fegert, J. M., & Mühlenkamp, J. J. (2009). An international comparison of adolescent non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) and suicide attempts: Germany and the USA. Psychological Medicine, 27, 1–10. doi:10.1017/S0033291708005114.
Reddy, M., Borum, R., Berglund, J., Vossekuil, B., Fein, R., & Modzeleski, W. (2001). Evaluating risk for targeted violence in schools: Comparing risk assessment, threat assessment, and other approaches. Psychology in the Schools, 38, 157–172. doi:10.1002/pits.1007.
Scheithauer, H., Hayer, T., Petermann, F., & Jugert, G. (2006). Physical, verbal and relational forms of bullying among students from Germany: Age trends, gender differences, and correlates. Aggressive Behavior, 32, 261–275. doi:10.1002/ab.20128.
Schmidt, F., Campbell, M. A., & Houlding, C. (2011). Comparative analyses of the YLS/CMI, SAVRY, and PCL:YV in adolescent offenders: A 10-year follow-up into adulthood. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 9, 23–42. doi:10.1177/1541204010371793.
Skiba, R., Reynolds, C. R., Graham, S., Sheras, P., Conoley, J. C., & Garcia-Vazquez, E. (2006). Are zero tolerance policies effective in the schools? An evidentiary review and recommendations: A report by the American Psychological Association Zero Tolerance Task Force. Retrieved April, 16, 2009 from http://www.senate.state.tx.us/75r/Senate/commit/c530/handouts06/092006.c530.LevinM.1.pdf.
Surette, R. (2010). Media, crime, and criminal justice. Belmont, CA: Thomson.
Strong, K., & Cornell, D. (2008). Student threat assessment in Memphis city schools: A descriptive report. Behavioral Disorders, 34, 42–54.
Van Dyke, R., & Schroeder, J. (2006). Implementation of the Dallas Threat of Violence Risk Assessment. In S. R. Jimerson & M. J. Furlong (Eds.), The handbook of school violence and school safety (pp. 603–616). Mahwah, NJ: Lawerence Erlbaum.
Verlinden, S., Hersen, M., & Thomas, J. (2000). Risk factors in school shootings. Clinical Psychology Review, 20, 3–56. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7358(99)00055-0.
Vossekuil, B., Fein, R. A., Reddy, M., Borum, R., & Modzeleski, W. (2002). The final report and findings of the Safe School Initiative: Implications for the prevention of school attacks in the United States. Washington: U.S. Secret Service and U.S.Department of Education.
Yang, M., Wong, S. C. P., & Coid, J. (2010). The efficacy of violence prediction: A meta-analytic comparison of nine risk assessment tools. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 740–767. doi:10.1037/a0020473.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bondü, R., Scheithauer, H., Leuschner, V., Cornell, D.G. (2013). International Perspectives on Prevention and Intervention in School Shootings. In: Böckler, N., Seeger, T., Sitzer, P., Heitmeyer, W. (eds) School Shootings. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5526-4_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5526-4_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-5525-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-5526-4
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)