Śūnyatā: Objective Referent or Via Negativa?

  • Chapter
Studies in Religion
  • 35 Accesses

Abstract

This essay examines the concept of śūnyatū as it is formulated in the Hrdaya sūtras of the Buddhist prajñā-pāramitā literature and in the Mūlamadhamaka-kārikās of Nāgārjuna.1 An attempt will be made to point out some of the difficulties involved in seeking an objective referent for the term and in preserving the tension implicit in the affirmation of the middle way. I hope to show that the via negativa approach has positive implications for understanding śūnyatā and that in the final analysis we may have to look for its meaning in the way it is used in the Buddhist way of life.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. E.B. Cowell (ed.) Buddhist Mahāyāna Texts (New York: Dover Publications, 1969)

    Google Scholar 

  2. F.J. Streng, Emptiness: a Study in Religious Meaning (New York: Abingdon Press, 1967) Appendix A; Edward Conze, Buddhist Wisdom Books (London: George Allen and Unwin, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Masao Abe, Zen and Western Thought, edited by Wiliam R. La Fleur (Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 1985; London: Macmillan, 1985) p. 93.

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. Hiryanna, Outlines of Indian Philosophy (London: George Allen and Unwin, 1973) pp. 220, 222.

    Google Scholar 

  5. D.T. Susuki, Outlines of Mahayana Buddhism (New York: Schoken, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  6. T.V.R. Murti, The Central Philosophy of Buddhism (London: Allen and Unwin, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cf. Ninian Smart, Doctrine and Argument in Indian Philosophy (London: Allen and Unwin, 1969) pp. 54, 223.

    Google Scholar 

  8. L. Wittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations (Oxford: Blackwell, 1963) pp. 133, 255.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cf. Ninian Smart, op. cit., p. 55; Masao e, op. cit., p. 512; Edward Conze, op. cit., p. 78; Murti, op. cit., p. 226.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hsueh-Li Cheng, ‘Nagarjuna’s approach to the problem of the existence of God’, Religious Studies, xii, 2 June, 1976, p. 215.

    Google Scholar 

  11. KV. Ramanan, Nāgārjuna’s Philosophy (Delhi: Bharatiya Vidya Prakashan, 1971) p. 16.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1995 Glyn Richards

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Richards, G. (1995). Śūnyatā: Objective Referent or Via Negativa?. In: Studies in Religion. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24147-7_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation