The Comparative Study of Communist States

  • Chapter
Communist Political Systems

Abstract

Communist states are a relatively recent phenomenon. Seventy years ago there were none at all; forty years ago there were only three, the USSR and two Asian outposts, Mongolia and Tuva; and as late as 1945 there were only five such states, located for the most part in Eastern Europe (Albania and Yugoslavia as well as the USSR) and also in Asia (North Vietnam and Mongolia, Tuva having in the meantime been absorbed by the USSR). Since then communist regimes have come into existence elsewhere in Eastern Europe (Bulgaria, Romania, Poland, Czechoslovakia, Hungary and the German Democratic Republic), in Latin America (Cuba), and also in Asia (China, North Korea, and most recently Laos and Kampuchea). As a result of these changes there were sixteen states which, at the beginning of the 1980s, could reasonably be classified as communist (Table 1.1). In addition a number of other states, particularly in the develo** countries, have adopted some of the institutional features of the communist states such as a single ruling party or a centrally planned economy, and communist or workers’ parties have come into existence in virtually every country of the world, some of them claiming independence of any of the existing ruling parties but all of them accepting the authority of Marxism—Leninism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

eBook
USD 9.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Further Reading

  • A reliable introduction to the development of the communist states is available in Hugh Seton-Watson, The Pattern of Communist Revolution, rev. edn (London and New York, 1960).

    Google Scholar 

  • This may be supplemented by Thomas T. Hammond (ed.), The Anatomy of Communist Takeovers (New Haven and London, 1975);

    Google Scholar 

  • François Fetjö, A History of the People’s Democracies, rev. edn (Harmondsworth, 1974);

    Google Scholar 

  • Zbigniew K. Brzezinski, The Soviet Bloc: Unity and Conflict, rev. edn (Cambridge, Mass. and London, 1967);

    Google Scholar 

  • MartinMcCauley (ed.), Communist Power in Europe 1944–49 (London, 1977);

    Google Scholar 

  • and William Deakin, Harry Shukman and Harry Willetts, A History of World Communism (London, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  • Developments over the last couple of decades are reviewed in Hugh Seton-Watson, The Imperialist Revolutionaries: World Communism in the 1960s and 1970s, rev. edn (London, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  • Recent events may be followed in the Annual Register (London) and the Yearbook on International Communist Affairs (Stanford, Calif.) A selection of documentary sources is available in Bogdan Szajkowski (ed.), Documents in Communist Affairs (Cardiff), which has been published periodically since 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • A number of important articles on the interpretation of communist politics are collected in Frederic J. Fleron, Jr. (ed.), Communist Studies and the Social Sciences (Chicago, 1969)

    Google Scholar 

  • and in Roger E. Kanet (ed.), The Behavioral Revolution and Communist Studies (New York, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  • These may be supplemented by Chalmers Johnson (ed.), Change in Communist Systems (Stanford, Calif., 1970);

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Gordon Skilling and Franklyn Griffiths (eds.), Interest Groups in Soviet Politics (Princeton, N. J., 1971);

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghita Ionescu, Comparative Communist Politics (London, 1972);

    Google Scholar 

  • T. H. Rigby, ‘“Totalitarianism” and change in communist systems’, Comparative Politics IV (1972);

    Google Scholar 

  • A. H. Brown, Soviet Politics and Political Science (London, 1974);

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenard J. Cohen and Jane P. Shapiro (eds.), Communist Systems in Comparative Perspective (New York, 1974);

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel Tarschys, ‘The Soviet political system: three models’, European Journal of Political Research V (1977);

    Google Scholar 

  • and ch. 6 of David Lane Politics and Society in the USSR, 2nd edn (London, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  • The standard treatment of totalitarianism is Carl J. Friedrich and Zbigniew K. Brzezinski, Totalitarian Dictatorship and Autocracy, 2nd edn (Cambridge, Mass. and London, 1965).

    Google Scholar 

  • See also Carl J. Friedrich (ed.), Totalitarianism in Perspective (New York and London 1969);

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard Schapiro, Totalitarianism (London, 1972);

    Google Scholar 

  • and Michael Curtis, Totalitarianism (London, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • On modernisation theory, see John H. Kautsky, ‘Comparative communism versus comparative polities’, Studies in Comparative Communism VI (1973);

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephen White, ‘Communist systems and the “iron law of pluralism”’, British Journal of Political Science VIII (1978);

    Google Scholar 

  • and the same author’s Political Culture and Soviet Politics (London, 1979), ch. 8, from which the quotations in this section are taken.

    Google Scholar 

  • On the bureaucratic model see Alfred G. Meyer, ‘USSR, Incorporated’, Slavic Review XX (1961);

    Google Scholar 

  • the same author’s The Soviet Political System (New York, 1965);

    Google Scholar 

  • John A. Armstrong, ‘Sources of administrative behavior: some Soviet and Western European comparisons’, American Political Science Review LIX (1965);

    Google Scholar 

  • Dmitri K. Simes, ‘The Soviet invasion of Czechoslovakia and the limits of Kremlinology’, Studies in Comparative Communism VIII (1975);

    Google Scholar 

  • and Karen L. Dawisha, ‘The limits of the bureaucratic politics model: observations on the Soviet case’, ibid, XIII (1980), and the accompanying discussion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basic details about all Marxist—Leninist regimes presently in power may be found in Bogdan Szajkowski, (ed.), Marxist Governments: A World Survey, 3 vols. (London, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  • The Soviet Union and Eastern Europe more particularly are fully covered in Paul S. Shoup, The Eastern European and Soviet Data Handbook. Political, Social and Developmental Indicators 1945–75 (New York, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  • These may be updated by reference to annual publications such as the Statesman’s Yearbook (London), Whitaker’s Almanac (London) and the Europa Yearbook (London). Periodicals of particular importance to the student of comparative communist politics include Soviet Studies (Glasgow, quarterly), Slavic Review (Columbus, Ohio, quarterly), Survey (London quarterly), The China Quarterly (London, quarterly), Problems of Communism (Washington, D.C., bimonthly), Critique (Glasgow, biannually), and Studies in Comparative Communism (Los Angeles, quarterly).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1982 Stephen White, John Gardner and George Schöpflin

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

White, S., Gardner, J., Schöpflin, G. (1982). The Comparative Study of Communist States. In: Communist Political Systems. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16851-4_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation