Abstract
Neoantigens are crucial in distinguishing cancer cells from normal ones and play a significant role in cancer immunotherapy. The field of bioinformatics prediction for tumor neoantigens has rapidly developed, focusing on the prediction of peptide-HLA binding affinity. In this chapter, we introduce a user-friendly tool named DeepHLApan, which utilizes deep learning techniques to predict neoantigens by considering both peptide-HLA binding affinity and immunogenicity. We provide the application of DeepHLApan, along with the source code, docker version, and web-server. These resources are freely available at https://github.com/zjupgx/deephlapan and http://pgx.zju.edu.cn/deephlapan/.
References
Lee CH, Yelensky R, Jooss K, Chan TA (2018) Update on tumor neoantigens and their utility: why it is good to be different. Trends Immunol 39:536–548
Lu YC, Robbins PF (2016) Cancer immunotherapy targeting neoantigens. Semin Immunol 28:22–27
Snyder A, Makarov V, Merghoub T et al (2014) Genetic basis for clinical response to CTLA-4 blockade in melanoma. N Engl J Med 371:2189–2199
Rizvi NA, Hellmann MD, Snyder A et al (2016) Mutational landscape determines sensitivity to PD-1 blockade in non-small cell lung cancer. Science 80- ) 348:124–129
Riaz N, Havel JJ, Makarov V et al (2017) Tumor and microenvironment evolution during immunotherapy with Nivolumab. Cell 171:934–949.e15
Yadav M, Jhunjhunwala S, Phung QT et al (2014) Predicting immunogenic tumour mutations by combining mass spectrometry and exome sequencing. Nature 515:572–576
Matsushita H, Vesely MD, Koboldt DC et al (2012) Cancer exome analysis reveals a T-cell-dependent mechanism of cancer immunoediting. Nature 482:400–404
Zhou Z, Wu J, Ren J et al (2021) TSNAD v2.0: a one-stop software solution for tumor-specific neoantigen detection. Comput Struct Biotechnol J 19:4510–4516
Hundal J, Carreno BM, Petti AA et al (2016) pVAC-Seq: A genome-guided in silico approach to identifying tumor neoantigens. Genome Med 8:11
Zhang J, Mardis ER, Maher CA (2017) INTEGRATE-neo: a pipeline for personalized gene fusion neoantigen discovery. Bioinformatics 33:555–557
Lundegaard C, Hoof I, Lund O, Nielsen M (2010) State of the art and challenges in sequence based T-cell epitope prediction. Immunome Res 6:S3
Rothbard JB, Taylor WR (1988) A sequence pattern common to T cell epitopes. EMBO J 7:93–100
Liu G, Li D, Li Z et al (2017) PSSMHCpan: a novel PSSM-based software for predicting class I peptide-HLA binding affinity. Gigascience 6:1–11
Luo H, Ye H, Ng HW et al (2016) sNebula, a network-based algorithm to predict binding between human leukocyte antigens and peptides. Sci Rep 6:32115
Bui HH, Schiewe AJ, Von Grafenstein H, Haworth IS (2006) Structural prediction of peptides binding to MHC class I molecules. Proteins Struct Funct Genet 63:43–52
Mukherjee S, Bhattacharyya C, Chandra N (2016) HLaffy: estimating peptide affinities for Class-1 HLA molecules by learning position-specific pair potentials. Bioinformatics 32:2297–2305
Wang P, Sidney J, Dow C et al (2008) A systematic assessment of MHC class II peptide binding predictions and evaluation of a consensus approach. PLoS Comput Biol 4:e1000048
Karosiene E, Lundegaard C, Lund O, Nielsen M (2012) NetMHCcons: a consensus method for the major histocompatibility complex class i predictions. Immunogenetics 64:177–186
Ward JP, Gubin MM, Schreiber RD (2016) The role of neoantigens in naturally occurring and therapeutically induced immune responses to cancer. Adv Immunol 130:25–74
Abelin JG, Keskin DB, Sarkizova S et al (2017) Mass spectrometry profiling of HLA-Associated peptidomes in mono-allelic cells enables more accurate epitope prediction. Immunity 46:315–326
Jurtz V, Paul S, Andreatta M et al (2017) NetMHCpan-4.0: improved peptide–MHC class I interaction predictions integrating eluted ligand and peptide binding affinity data. J Immunol 199:3360–3368
Goff SL, Dudley ME, Citrin DE et al (2016) Randomized, prospective evaluation comparing intensity of lymphodepletion before adoptive transfer of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes for patients with metastatic melanoma. J Clin Oncol 34:2389–2397
Chang JY, Hu ÆY, Siegel ÆE, Zhou LSÆY (2007) PAX6 increases glioma cell susceptibility to detachment and oxidative stress. J Neuro-Oncol 84:9–19
Vidal LJ, Perry JK, Vouyovitch CM et al (2010) PAX5 α enhances the epithelial behavior of human mammary carcinoma cells. Mol Cancer Res 8:444–456
Liu Z, Cui Y, **ong Z et al (2019) DeepSeqPan, a novel deep convolutional neural network model for pan-specific class I HLA- peptide binding affinity prediction. Sci Rep 9:794
Wu J, Wang W, Zhang J et al (2019) DeepHLApan: A deep learning approach for neoantigen prediction considering both HLA-peptide binding and immunogenicity. Front Immunol 10:2559
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [Grant No. 31971371], the Zhejiang Provincial Natural Sciences Foundation of China [Grant No. LQ24H300005], and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [Grant No. 2022M712778]. We thank the Information Technology Center, State Key Lab of CAD&CG, Zhejiang University, and Alibaba Cloud for the support of computing resources.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Wu, J., Li, J., Chen, S., Zhou, Z. (2024). DeepHLApan: A Deep Learning Approach for the Prediction of Peptide-HLA Binding and Immunogenicity. In: Boegel, S. (eds) HLA Ty**. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 2809. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-3874-3_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-3874-3_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-0716-3873-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-0716-3874-3
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols