Abstract
Actively transcribed genes harbor cis-regulatory modules with comparatively low nucleosome occupancy and few high-order structures (=“open chromatin”), whereas non-transcribed genes are characterized by high nucleosome density and extensive interactions between nucleosomes (=“closed chromatin”), preventing transcription factor binding. Knowledge about chromatin accessibility is crucial to understand gene regulatory networks determining cellular decisions. Several techniques are available to map chromatin accessibility, among which the Assay for Transposase-Accessible Chromatin using sequencing (ATAC-seq) is one of the most popular. ATAC-seq is based on a straightforward and robust protocol but requires adjustments for different cell types. Here, we describe an optimized protocol for ATAC-seq of freshly isolated murine muscle stem cells. We provide details for the isolation of MuSC, tagmentation, library amplification, double-sided SPRI bead cleanup, and library quality assessment and give recommendations for sequencing parameters and downstream analysis. The protocol should facilitate generation of high-quality data sets of chromatin accessibility in MuSCs, even for newcomers to the field.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Mayran A, Drouin J (2018) Pioneer transcription factors shape the epigenetic landscape. J Biol Chem 293(36):13795–13804. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.R117.001232
Klemm SL, Shipony Z, Greenleaf WJ (2019) Chromatin accessibility and the regulatory epigenome. Nat Rev Genet 20(4):207–220. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41576-018-0089-8
Buenrostro JD, Wu B, Chang HY et al (2015) ATAC-seq: a method for assaying chromatin accessibility genome-wide. Curr Protoc Mol Biol 109:21 29 21-21 29 29. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471142727.mb2129s109
Jia G, Preussner J, Chen X et al (2018) Single cell RNA-seq and ATAC-seq analysis of cardiac progenitor cell transition states and lineage settlement. Nat Commun 9(1):4877. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07307-6
Ludwig LS, Lareau CA, Bao EL et al (2019) Transcriptional states and chromatin accessibility underlying human erythropoiesis. Cell Rep 27(11):3228–3240 e3227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2019.05.046
Huang N, Niu J, Feng Y et al (2015) Oligodendroglial development: new roles for chromatin accessibility. Neuroscientist 21(6):579–588. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073858414565467
Trevino AE, Sinnott-Armstrong N, Andersen J et al (2020) Chromatin accessibility dynamics in a model of human forebrain development. Science 367(6476):eaay1645. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aay1645
Corces MR, Granja JM, Shams S et al (2018) The chromatin accessibility landscape of primary human cancers. Science 362(6413):eaav1898. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aav1898
Deutschmeyer V, Breuer J, Walesch SK et al (2019) Epigenetic therapy of novel tumour suppressor ZAR1 and its cancer biomarker function. Clin Epigenetics 11(1):182. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13148-019-0774-2
Zhou ZH, Wang QL, Mao LH et al (2019) Chromatin accessibility changes are associated with enhanced growth and liver metastasis capacity of acid-adapted colorectal cancer cells. Cell Cycle 18(4):511–522. https://doi.org/10.1080/15384101.2019.1578145
Jia Y, Vong JS, Asafova A et al (2019) Lamin B1 loss promotes lung cancer development and metastasis by epigenetic derepression of RET. J Exp Med 216(6):1377–1395. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20181394
Bryois J, Garrett ME, Song L et al (2018) Evaluation of chromatin accessibility in prefrontal cortex of individuals with schizophrenia. Nat Commun 9(1):3121. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05379-y
Liu Y, Chang JC, Hon CC et al (2018) Chromatin accessibility landscape of articular knee cartilage reveals aberrant enhancer regulation in osteoarthritis. Sci Rep 8(1):15499. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-33779-z
Gunther S, Kim J, Kostin S et al (2013) Myf5-positive satellite cells contribute to Pax7-dependent long-term maintenance of adult muscle stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 13(5):590–601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2013.07.016
Evano B, Tajbakhsh S (2018) Skeletal muscle stem cells in comfort and stress. NPJ Regen Med 3:24. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41536-018-0062-3
Kuang S, Kuroda K, Le Grand F et al (2007) Asymmetric self-renewal and commitment of satellite stem cells in muscle. Cell 129(5):999–1010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2007.03.044
Sreenivasan K, Ianni A, Kunne C et al (2020) Attenuated epigenetic suppression of muscle stem cell necroptosis is required for efficient regeneration of dystrophic muscles. Cell Rep 31(7):107652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2020.107652
Boonsanay V, Zhang T, Georgieva A et al (2016) Regulation of skeletal muscle stem cell quiescence by Suv4-20h1-dependent facultative heterochromatin formation. Cell Stem Cell 18(2):229–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2015.11.002
Lilja KC, Zhang N, Magli A et al (2017) Pax7 remodels the chromatin landscape in skeletal muscle stem cells. PLoS One 12(4):e0176190. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176190
Zhou J, So KK, Li Y et al (2019) Elevated H3K27ac in aged skeletal muscle leads to increase in extracellular matrix and fibrogenic conversion of muscle satellite cells. Aging Cell 18(5):e12996. https://doi.org/10.1111/acel.12996
Garcia-Prat L, Munoz-Canoves P (2017) Aging, metabolism and stem cells: spotlight on muscle stem cells. Mol Cell Endocrinol 445:109–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mce.2016.08.021
Buenrostro JD, Giresi PG, Zaba LC et al (2013) Transposition of native chromatin for fast and sensitive epigenomic profiling of open chromatin, DNA-binding proteins and nucleosome position. Nat Methods 10(12):1213–1218. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2688
Chen X, Miragaia RJ, Natarajan KN et al (2018) A rapid and robust method for single cell chromatin accessibility profiling. Nat Commun 9(1):5345. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07771-0
Scott RW, Arostegui M, Schweitzer R et al (2019) Hic1 defines quiescent mesenchymal progenitor subpopulations with distinct functions and fates in skeletal muscle regeneration. Cell Stem Cell 25(6):797–813 e799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2019.11.004
Preussner J, Zhong J, Sreenivasan K et al (2018) Oncogenic amplification of zygotic dux factors in regenerating p53-deficient muscle stem cells defines a molecular cancer subtype. Cell Stem Cell 23(6):794–805 e794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2018.10.011
Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B (2014) Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30(15):2114–2120. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170
Dobin A, Davis CA, Schlesinger F et al (2013) STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics 29(1):15–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635
Bentsen M, Goymann P, Schultheis H et al (2020) ATAC-seq footprinting unravels kinetics of transcription factor binding during zygotic genome activation. Nat Commun 11(1):4267. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-18035-1
Liu L, Cheung TH, Charville GW et al (2015) Isolation of skeletal muscle stem cells by fluorescence-activated cell sorting. Nat Protoc 10(10):1612–1624. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2015.110
Elustondo P, Martin LA, Karten B (2017) Mitochondrial cholesterol import. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Biol Lipids 1862(1):90–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbalip.2016.08.012
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Excellence Initiative “Cardiopulmonary Institute” (CPI), the DFG collaborative research center SFB1213, the DFG Transregional Collaborative Research Centre 81, the DFG Clinical Research Unit FKO 309, and the European Research Area Network on Cardiovascular Diseases project CLARIFY.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Yekelchyk, M., Guenther, S., Braun, T. (2023). Assay for Transposase-Accessible Chromatin Using Sequencing of Freshly Isolated Muscle Stem Cells. In: Asakura, A. (eds) Skeletal Muscle Stem Cells. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 2640. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-3036-5_27
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-3036-5_27
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-0716-3035-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-0716-3036-5
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols