Detection of Nuclear Biomarkers for Chromosomal Instability

  • Protocol
  • First Online:
Autophagy and Cancer

Part of the book series: Methods in Molecular Biology ((MIMB,volume 2445))

Abstract

Chromosomal instability (CIN) is a hallmark of cancer, which is characterized by the gain or loss of chromosomes as well as the rearrangement of the genetic material during cell division. Detection of mitotic errors such as misaligned chromosomes or chromosomal bridges (also known as lagging chromosomes) is challenging as it requires the analysis and manual discrimination of chromosomal aberrations in mitotic cells by molecular techniques. In interphase cells, more frequent in the cell population than mitotic cells, two distinct nuclear phenotypes are associated with CIN: the micronucleus and the toroidal nucleus. Several methods are available for the detection of micronuclei, but none for toroidal nuclei. Here, we provide a method to quantify the presence of both nuclear biomarkers for the evaluation of CIN status in non-mitotic cells particularly suited for genotoxicity screens.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Protocol
EUR 44.95
Price includes VAT (France)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 109.99
Price includes VAT (France)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
EUR 137.14
Price includes VAT (France)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
EUR 210.99
Price includes VAT (France)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

BSA:

Bovine serum albumin

CIN:

Chromosomal instability

DAPI:

4′,6-Diamidino-2-phenylindole

DMEM:

Dulbecco’s modified eagle medium

DNA:

Deoxyribonucleic acid

LAMP2:

Lysosome-associated membrane protein 2

LC3:

Microtubule-associated proteins 1A/1B light chain 3

PBS:

Phosphate-buffered saline

PFA:

Paraformaldehyde

UPS:

Ubiquitin proteasome system

UV:

Ultraviolet

References

  1. McClelland SE (2017) Role of chromosomal instability in cancer progression. Endocr Relat Cancer 24:T23–T31

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Watkins TBK, Lim EL, Petkovic M et al (2020) Pervasive chromosomal instability and karyotype order in tumour evolution. Nature 587:126–132

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hoevenaar WHM, Janssen A, Quirindongo AI et al (2020) Degree and site of chromosomal instability define its oncogenic potential. Nat Commun 11:1501

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Vargas-Rondón N, Pérez-Mora E, Villegas VE et al (2020) Role of chromosomal instability and clonal heterogeneity in the therapy response of breast cancer cell lines. Cancer Biol Med 17:970–985

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bakhoum SF, Landau DA (2017) Chromosomal instability as a driver of tumor heterogeneity and evolution. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 7(6):a029611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Almacellas E, Pelletier J, Day C et al (2021) Lysosomal degradation ensures accurate chromosomal segregation to prevent chromosomal instability. Autophagy 17:796–813

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hämälistö S, Stahl JL, Favaro E et al (2020) Spatially and temporally defined lysosomal leakage facilitates mitotic chromosome segregation. Nat Commun 11:229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Holdgaard SG, Cianfanelli V, Pupo E et al (2019) Selective autophagy maintains centrosome integrity and accurate mitosis by turnover of centriolar satellites. Nat Commun 10:4176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gisselsson D, Björk J, Höglund M et al (2001) Abnormal nuclear shape in solid tumors reflects mitotic instability. Am J Pathol 158:199–206

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sommer S, Buraczewska I, Kruszewski M (2020) Micronucleus assay: the state of art, and future directions. Int J Mol Sci 21(4):1534

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Krupina K, Goginashvili A, Cleveland DW (2021) Causes and consequences of micronuclei. Curr Opin Cell Biol 70:91–99

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hintzsche H, Hemmann U, Poth A et al (2017) Fate of micronuclei and micronucleated cells. Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res 771:85–98

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lepage CC, Thompson LL, Larson B et al (2020) An automated, single cell quantitative imaging microscopy approach to assess micronucleus formation, genotoxicity chromosome instability. Cells 9:344

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Mosesso P, Cinelli S (2019) In vitro cytogenetic assays: chromosomal aberrations and micronucleus tests. Methods Mol Biol 2031:79–104

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Beliën JA, Copper MP, Braakhuis BJ et al (1995) Standardization of counting micronuclei: definition of a protocol to measure genotoxic damage in human exfoliated cells. Carcinogenesis 16:2395–2400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ramadhani D, Purnami S (2013) Automated detection of binucleated cell and micronuclei using CellProfiler 2.0 software. HAYATI J Biosci 20:151–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Naso FD, Sterbini V, Crecca E et al (2020) Excess TPX2 interferes with microtubule disassembly and nuclei reformation at mitotic exit. Cells 9:374

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Verstraeten VLRM, Peckham LA, Olive M et al (2011) Protein farnesylation inhibitors cause donut-shaped cell nuclei attributable to a centrosome separation defect. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108:4997–5002

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E et al (2012) Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods 9:676–682

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

C.P. was supported by a Ramon y Cajal fellowship (RYC-2017-22959). This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant agreement no 799000 to C.M. We thank CERCA Program/Generalitat de Catalunya for institutional support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Caroline Mauvezin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature

About this protocol

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this protocol

Pons, C., Almacellas, E., Tauler, A., Mauvezin, C. (2022). Detection of Nuclear Biomarkers for Chromosomal Instability. In: Norberg, H., Norberg, E. (eds) Autophagy and Cancer. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 2445. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-2071-7_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-2071-7_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-0716-2070-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-0716-2071-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation