Abstract
MetaMSD is a proteomic software that integrates multiple quantitative mass spectrometry data analysis results using statistical summary combination approaches. By utilizing this software, scientists can combine results from their pilot and main studies to maximize their biomarker discovery while effectively controlling false discovery rates. It also works for combining proteomic datasets generated by different labeling techniques and/or different types of mass spectrometry instruments. With these advantages, MetaMSD enables biological researchers to explore various proteomic datasets in public repositories to discover new biomarkers and generate interesting hypotheses for future studies. In this protocol, we provide a step-by-step procedure on how to install and perform a meta-analysis for quantitative proteomics using MetaMSD.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Gygi SP, Rist B, Gerber SA, Turecek F, Gelb MH, Aebersold R (1999) Quantitative analysis of complex protein mixtures using isotope-coded affinity tags. Nat Biotechnol 17(10):994–999. https://doi.org/10.1038/13690
Hardt M, Witkowska HE, Webb S, Thomas LR, Dixon SE, Hall SC, Fisher SJ (2005) Assessing the effects of diurnal variation on the composition of human parotid saliva: quantitative analysis of native peptides using iTRAQ reagents. Anal Chem 77(15):4947–4954. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac050161r
Ong SE, Blagoev B, Kratchmarova I, Kristensen DB, Steen H, Pandey A, Mann M (2002) Stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture, SILAC, as a simple and accurate approach to expression proteomics. Mol Cell Probes 1(5):376–386. https://doi.org/10.1074/mcp.M200025-MCP200
Radulovic D, Jelveh S, Ryu S, Hamilton TG, Foss E, Mao Y, Emili A (2004) Informatics platform for global proteomic profiling and biomarker discovery using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Mol Cell Proteomics 3(10):984–997. https://doi.org/10.1074/mcp.M400061-MCP200
Ryu S, Gallis B, Goo YA, Shaffer SA, Radulovic D, Goodlett DR (2008) Comparison of a label-free quantitative proteomic method based on peptide ion current area to the isotope coded affinity tag method. Cancer Inf 6:CIN–S385. https://doi.org/10.4137/CIN.S385
Li XJ, Zhang H, Ranish JA, Aebersold R (2003) Automated statistical analysis of protein abundance ratios from data generated by stable-isotope dilution and tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Chem 75(23):6648–6657. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac034633i
Ryu SY, Qian WJ, Camp DG, Smith RD, Tompkins RG, Davis RW, **ao W (2014) Detecting differential protein expression in large-scale population proteomics. Bioinformatics 30(19):2741–2746. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu341
Ryu SY (2014) Bioinformatics tools to identify and quantify proteins using mass spectrometry data. Adv Protein Chem Struct Biol 94:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800168-4.00001-9
Washburn MP, Ulaszek RR, Yates JR (2003) Reproducibility of quantitative proteomic analyses of complex biological mixtures by multidimensional protein identification technology. Anal Chem 75(19):5054–5061. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac034120b
Ryu SY, Wendt GA (2019) MetaMSD: meta analysis for mass spectrometry data. PeerJ 7:e6699. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6699
Storey JD (2002) A direct approach to false discovery rates. J R Stat Soc B 64(3):479–498. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9868.00346
Pino LK, Searle BC, Bollinger JG, Nunn B, MacLean B, MacCoss MJ (2020) The skyline ecosystem: informatics for quantitative mass spectrometry proteomics. Mass Spectr Rev 39(3):229–244. https://doi.org/10.1002/mas.21540
Cox J, Hein MY, Luber CA, Paron I, Nagaraj N, Mann M (2014) Accurate proteome-wide label-free quantification by delayed normalization and maximal peptide ratio extraction, termed MaxLFQ. Mol. Cell. Probes 13(9):2513–2526. https://doi.org/10.1074/mcp.M113.031591
Schaab C, Geiger T, Stoehr G, Cox J, Mann M (2012) Analysis of high accuracy, quantitative proteomics data in the MaxQB database. Mol Cell Proteomics 11(3):M111–014068. https://doi.org/10.1074/mcp.M111.014068
Lemeer S, Hahne H, Pachl F, Kuster B (2012) Software tools for MS-based quantitative proteomics: a brief overview. Quantitative methods in proteomics. Springer, Berlin, pp 489–499. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-885-6_29
Solntsev SK, Shortreed MR, Frey BL, Smith LM (2018) Enhanced global post-translational modification discovery with MetaMorpheus. J Proteome Res 17(5):1844–1851. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jproteome.7b00873
Bouyssié D, Hesse AM, Mouton-Barbosa E, Rompais M, Macron C, Carapito C, Gonzalez de Peredo A, Couté Y, Dupierris V, Burel A, Menetrey JP, Kalaitzakis A, Poisat J, Romdhani A, Burlet-Schiltz O, Cianférani S, Garin J, Bruley C (2020) Proline: an efficient and user-friendly software suite for large-scale proteomics. Bioinformatics 36(10):3148–3155. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa118
The M, Käll L (2019) Integrated identification and quantification error probabilities for shotgun proteomics. Mol Cell Proteomics 18(3):561–570
Choi M, Chang CY, Clough T, Broudy D, Killeen T, MacLean B, Vitek O (2014) MSstats: an R package for statistical analysis of quantitative mass spectrometry-based proteomic experiments. Bioinformatics 30(17):2524–2526. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu305
Chang CY, Picotti P, Hüttenhain R, Heinzelmann-Schwarz V, Jovanovic M, Aebersold R, Vitek O (2012) Protein significance analysis in selected reaction monitoring (SRM) measurements. Mol Cell Proteomics 11(4):M111–014662. https://doi.org/10.1074/mcp.M111.014662
Clough T, Thaminy S, Ragg S, Aebersold R, Vitek O (2012) Statistical protein quantification and significance analysis in label-free LC-MS experiments with complex designs. BMC Bioinf 13(16):1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-13-S16-S6
Wieczorek S, Combes F, Lazar C, Giai Gianetto Q, Gatto L, Dorffer A, Hesse AM, Coute Y, Ferro M, Bruley C, Burger T (2017) DAPAR & ProStaR: software to perform statistical analyses in quantitative discovery proteomics. Bioinformatics 33(1):135–136. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btw580
Heard NA, Rubin-Delanchy P (2018) Choosing between methods of combining p-values. Biometrika 105(1):239–246. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/asx076
Sedgwick P (2012) Multiple significance tests: the Bonferroni correction. BMJ 344. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e509
Acknowledgements
MetaMSD software development was supported by grants from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM103440 and 1R15GM126562-01).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Ryu, S.Y., Yun, M.P., Kim, S. (2023). Integrating Multiple Quantitative Proteomic Analyses Using MetaMSD. In: Burger, T. (eds) Statistical Analysis of Proteomic Data. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 2426. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-1967-4_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-1967-4_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-0716-1966-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-0716-1967-4
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols