A Scaffold Free 3D Bioprinted Cartilage Model for In Vitro Toxicology

  • Protocol
  • First Online:
Computer-Aided Tissue Engineering

Part of the book series: Methods in Molecular Biology ((MIMB,volume 2147))

Abstract

Bioprinting has emerged as a promising method for precise spatiotemporal patterning of biological materials such as living cells, genetic materials, and proteins, which are sensitive to any other fabrication techniques. Bioprinting allows the generation of tissue constructs and models that closely mimic the anatomical and physiological attributes of a chosen tissue. In vitro toxicology assays can greatly benefit from bioprinting as drugs can be screened with higher efficiencies in a significantly reduced period. This protocol describes a method for fabricating bioprinted cartilage constructs which can be used for in vitro toxicology studies employing a scalable “tissue strand” bioprinting modality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Protocol
EUR 44.95
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 85.59
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
EUR 106.99
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
EUR 171.19
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dababneh AB, Ozbolat IT (2014) Bioprinting technology: a current state-of-the-art review. J Manuf Sci Eng 136:61016. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4028512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ozbolat IT (2015) Scaffold-based or scaffold-free bioprinting: competing or complementing approaches? J Nanotechnol Eng Med 6:24701. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4030414

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Wu Y, Wong YS, Fuh JYH (2017) Degradation behaviors of geometric cues and mechanical properties in a 3D scaffold for tendon repair. J Biomed Mater Res A 105:1138–1149. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.35966

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Yu Y, Moncal KK, Li J et al (2016) Three-dimensional bioprinting using self-assembling scalable scaffold-free “tissue strands” as a new bioink. Sci Rep 6:28714

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ozbolat IT, Hospodiuk M (2016) Current advances and future perspectives in extrusion-based bioprinting. Biomaterials 76:321–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.10.076

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ozbolat IT, Moncal KK, Gudapati H (2017) Evaluation of bioprinter technologies. Addit Manuf 13:179–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2016.10.003

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gudapati H, Dey M, Ozbolat I (2016) A comprehensive review on droplet-based bioprinting: Past, present and future. Biomaterials 102:20–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.06.012

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Murphy SV, Atala A (2014) 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs. Nat Biotechnol 32:773–785

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Peng W, Unutmaz D, Ozbolat IT (2016) Bioprinting towards physiologically relevant tissue models for pharmaceutics. Trends Biotechnol 34:722–732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.05.013

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nicholson JK, Connelly J, Lindon JC, Holmes E (2002) Metabonomics: a platform for studying drug toxicity and gene function. Nat Rev Drug Discov 1:153–161. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd728

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Yu Y, Zheng H, Buckwalter JA, Martin JA (2014) Single cell sorting identifies progenitor cell population from full thickness bovine articular cartilage. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 22:1318–1326. https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.3369

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work has been supported by National Science Foundation Award # 1624515. Pallab Datta acknowledges the Department of Science and Technology, Government of India, INSPIRE Faculty Award. The author thanks Dr. Weijie Peng (Penn State University) for his fruitful insights and Dr. Adil Akkouch (The University of Iowa) for his assistance with SEM imaging. The authors also thank Dr. James A. Martin (The University of Iowa) for providing facilities with mechanical testing.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ibrahim T. Ozbolat .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature

About this protocol

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this protocol

Datta, P., Wu, Y., Yu, Y., Moncal, K.K., Ozbolat, I.T. (2021). A Scaffold Free 3D Bioprinted Cartilage Model for In Vitro Toxicology. In: Rainer, A., Moroni, L. (eds) Computer-Aided Tissue Engineering. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 2147. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-0611-7_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-0611-7_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-0716-0610-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-0716-0611-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation