This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (Spain)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 76.99
Price includes VAT (Spain)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Andreassi L, Perotti R, Rubegni P, Burroni M, Cevenini G, Biagioli M, Taddeucci P, Dell’Eva G, Barbini P (1999) Digital dermoscopy analysis for the differentiation of atypical nevi and early melanoma: a new quantitative semiology. Arch Dermatol 135: 1459–1465

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Argenziano G, Fabbrocini G, Carli P, De Giorgi V, Sammarco E, Delfino M (1998) Epiluminescence microscopy for the diagnosis of doubtful melanocytic skin lesions. Comparison of the ABCD rule of dermatoscopy and a new 7-point checklist based on pattern analysis. Arch Dermatol 134: 1563–1570

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bauer J, Blum A, Strohhäcker U, Garbe C (2004) Surveillance of patients at high risk for melanoma using digital dermoscopy. Br J Dermatol 152: 87–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Blum A (2003) Amelanotic/hypomelanotic melanoma — is dermoscopy useful for diagnosis? JDDG 8: 666–667

    Google Scholar 

  5. Blum A, Kreusch J, Bauer J, Garbe C (2003) Dermatoskopie von Hauttumoren. Steinkopff, Darmstadt

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Blum A, Luedtke H, Ellwanger U, Schwabe R, Rassner G, Garbe C (2004) Digital image analysis for diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma. Development of a highly effective computer algorithm based on analysis of 837 melanocytic tumors. Br J Dermatol: 151: 1029–1038

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Carli P, de Giorgi V, Chiarugi A, Nardini P, Weinstock MA, Crocetti E, Stante M, Giannotti B (2004) Addition of dermoscopy to conventional naked-eye examination in melanoma screening: a randomized study. J Am Acad Dermatol 50: 683–689

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cascinelli N, Ferrario M, Tonelli T, Leo E (1987) A possible new tool for clinical diagnosis of melanoma: the computer. J Am Acad Dermatol 16: 361–367

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cascinelli N, Ferrario M, Bufalino R, Zurrida S, Galimberti V, Mascheroni L, Bartoli C, Clemente C (1992) Results obtained by using a computerized image analysis system designed as an aid to diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma. Melanoma Res 2: 163–170

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Elbaum M, Kopf AW, Rabinovitz HS, Langley RG, Kamino H, Mihm MC, Jr., Sober AJ, Peck GL, Bogdan A, Gutkowicz-Krusin D, Greenebaum M, Keem S, Oliviero M, Wang S (2001) Automatic differentiation of melanoma from melanocytic nevi with multispectral digital dermoscopy: a feasibility study. J Am Acad Dermatol 44: 207–218

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Garbe C, Büttner P, Weiss J, Soyer HP, Stocker U, Kruger S, Roser M, Weckbecker J, Panizzon R, Bahmer F, et al. (1994) Associated factors in the prevalence of more than 50 common melanocytic nevi, atypical melanocytic nevi, and actinic lentigines: multicenter case-control study of the Central Malignant Melanoma Registry of the German Dermatological Society. J Invest Dermatol 102: 700–705

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Garbe C, Büttner P, Weiss J, Soyer HP, Stocker U, Kruger S, Roser M, Weckbecker J, Panizzon R, Bahmer F, et al. (1994) Risk factors for develo** cutaneous melanoma and criteria for identifying persons at risk: multicenter case-control study of the Central Malignant Melanoma Registry of the German Dermatological Society. J Invest Dermatol 102: 695–699

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Garbe C (1995) Risikofaktoren für die Entwicklung maligner Melanome und Identifikation von Risikopersonen im deutschsprachigen Raum. Hautarzt 46: 309–314

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Haenssle HA, Vente C, Bertsch HP, Rupprecht R, Abuzahra F, Junghans V, Ellinghaus B, Emmert S, Hallermann C, Rosenberger A, Neumann C (2004) Results of a surveillance programme for patients at high risk of malignant melanoma using digital and conventional dermoscopy. Eur J Cancer Prev 13: 133–138

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hoffmann K, Gambichler T, Rick A, Kreutz M, Anschuetz M, Grunendick T, Orlikov A, Gehlen S, Perotti R, Andreassi L, Newton Bishop J, Cesarini JP, Fischer T, Frosch PJ, Lindskov R, Mackie R, Nashan D, Sommer A, Neumann M, Ortonne JP, Bahadoran P, Penas PF, Zoras U, Altmeyer P (2003) Diagnostic and neural analysis of skin cancer (DANAOS). A multicentre study for collection and computer-aided analysis of data from pigmented skin lesions using digital dermoscopy. Br J Dermatol 149: 801–809

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kittler H, Binder M (2002) Follow-up of melanocytic skin lesions with digital dermoscopy: risks and benefits. Arch Dermatol 138: 1379

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kittler H, Pehamberger H, Wolff K, Binder M (2002) Diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopy. Lancet Oncol 3: 159–165

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kittler H (2003) Use of digital dermoscopy to monitor melanocytic lesions: risks and benefits. J Drugs Dermatol 2: 309–311

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kreusch J, Koch F (1996) Auflichtmikroskopiscche Charakterisierung von Gefäßmustern in Hauttumoren. Hautarzt 47: 264–272

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Malvehy J, Puig S (2002) Follow-up of melanocytic skin lesions with digital total-body photography and digital dermoscopy: a two-step method. Clin Dermatol 20: 297–304

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Menzies SW, Ingvar C, McCarthy WH (1996) A sensitivity and specificity analysis of the surface microscopy features of invasive melanoma. Melanoma Res 6: 55–62

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Menzies SW (1999) Automated epiluminescence microscopy: human vs machine in the diagnosis of melanoma. Arch Dermatol 135: 1538–1540

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Menzies SW, Gutenev A, Avramidis M, Batrac A, McCarthy WH (2001) Short-term digital surface microscopic monitoring of atypical or changing melanocytic lesions. Arch Dermatol 137: 1583–1589

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Pehamberger H, Binder M, Steiner A, Wolff K (1993) In vivo epiluminescence microscopy: improvement of early diagnosis of melanoma. J Invest Dermatol 100: 356–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Rosado B, Menzies S, Harbauer A, Pehamberger H, Wolff K, Binder M, Kittler H (2003) Accuracy of computer diagnosis of melanoma: a quantitative meta-analysis. Arch Dermatol 139: 361–367; discussion 366

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Schiffner R, Schiffner-Rohe J, Vogt T, Landthaler M, Wlotzke U, Cognetta AB, Stolz W (2000) Improvement of early recognition of lentigo maligna using dermatoscopy. J Am Acad Dermatol 42: 25–32

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Schiffner R, Schiffner-Rohe J, Landthaler M, Stolz W (2003) Long-term dermoscopic follow-up of melanocytic naevi: clinical outcome and patient compliance. Br J Dermatol 149: 79–86

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Schindewolf T, Schiffner R, Stolz W, Albert R, Abmayr W, Harms H (1994) Evaluation of different image acquisition techniques for a computer vision system in the diagnosis of malignant melanoma. J Am Acad Dermatol 31: 33–41

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Seidenari S, Pellacani G, Pepe P (1998) Digital videomicroscopy improves diagnostic accuracy for melanoma. J Am Acad Dermatol 39: 175–181

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Seidenari S, Pellacani G, Giannetti A (1999) Digital videomicroscopy and image analysis with automatic classification for detection of thin melanomas. Melanoma Res 9: 163–171

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Soyer HP, Argenziano G, Chimenti S, Ruocco V (2001) Dermoscopy of pigmented skin lesions. Eur J Dermatol 11: 270–276; quiz 277

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Stolz W, Bilek P, Landthaler M, Merkle T, Braun-Falco O (1989) Skin surface microscopy. Lancet 2: 864–865

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Stolz W (1996) Computer screening for early detection of melanoma—is there a future? Br J Dermatol 135: 146

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Stolz W, Braun-Falco O, Bilek P, Burgdorf WHC, Landthaler M (2004) Farbatlas der Dermatoskopie. Thieme, Stuttgart

    Book  Google Scholar 

  35. Voigt H, Classen R (2002) Computer vision and digital imaging technology in melanoma detection. Semin Oncol 29: 308–327

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Gerd Plewig (Prof. Dr. med. Dr. h.c.)Peter Kaudewitz (Prof. Dr. med.)Christian A. Sander (Priv.-Doz. Dr. med.)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Herzinger, T. et al. (2005). Dermatoskopie. In: Plewig, G., Kaudewitz, P., Sander, C.A. (eds) Fortschritte der praktischen Dermatologie und Venerologie. Fortschritte der praktischen Dermatologie und Venerologie, vol 19. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-28691-8_94

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-28691-8_94

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-21055-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-28691-2

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation