Abstract
Forty young adults and 40 older adults performed seven visuospatial information processing tasks. Factor analyses of the response times (RTs) yielded a single principal component with a similar composition in both age samples. For both samples, regressing the mean RTs of fast and slow subgroups for the seven tasks (18 conditions) on the corresponding mean RTs for their age group accounted for 99% of the variance. Taken together, these findings suggest that individual differences in processing time were largely task independent. The magnification hypothesis, a simple mathematical model of the interaction between age and ability, is presented. This model correctly predicts the finding that in both the young and the older adult groups, individual differences increased systematically with task difficulty. The magnification hypothesis also explains the regression parameters describing individual differences among young adults and predicts correctly that equivalent parameters describe individual differences among older adults. According to the magnification hypothesis, the RTs of slower individuals are more affected by aging than those of faster individuals, and slower individuals may be more at risk with respect to other biological insults (e.g., changes in health status) as well.
Article PDF
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Cerella, J. (1985). Information processing rates in the elderly.Psychological Bulletin,98, 67–83.
Cerella, J. (1990). Aging and information-processing rate. In J. E. Birren & K. W. Schaie (Eds.),Handbook of the psychology of aging (3rd ed., pp. 201–221). San Diego: Academic Press.
Cerella, J., &Hale, S. (1994). The rise and fall of information processing rates over the life span.Acta Psychologica,86, 109–197.
Cerella, J., Poon, L. W., &Williams, D. M. (1980). Age and the complexity hypothesis. In L. W. Poon (Ed.),Aging in the 1980s: Psychological issues (pp. 332–340). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Ferraro, F. R. (1996). Cognitive slowing in closed-head injury.Brain & Cognition,32, 429–440.
Gorsuch, R. L. (1984).Factor analysis. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders.
Hale, S., &Jansen, J. (1994). Global processing-time coefficients characterize individual differences in cognitive speed.Psychological Science,5, 384–389.
Hale, S., Myerson, J., Faust, M., &Fristoe, N. (1995). Converging evidence for domain-specific slowing from multiple nonlexical tasks and multiple analytic methods.Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences,50, P202-P211.
Hale, S., Myerson, J., Smith, G. A., &Poon, L. W. (1988). Age, variability, and speed: Between-subjects diversity.Psychology & Aging,3, 407–410.
Hertzog, C., &Schaie, K. W. (1986). Stability and change in adult intelligence: 1. Analysis of longitudinal covariance structures.Psychology & Aging,1, 159–171.
Kail, R. (1997). The neural noise hypothesis: Evidence from processing speed in adults with multiple sclerosis.Aging, Neuropsychology, & Cognition,4, 157–165.
Kail, R., &Salthouse, T. A. (1994). Processing speed as a mental capacity.Acta Psychologica,86, 199–225.
Lima, S. D., Hale, S., &Myerson, J. (1991). How general is general slowing? Evidence from the lexical domain.Psychology & Aging,6, 416–425.
Maylor, E. A., &Rabbitt, P. M. A. (1993). Alcohol, reaction time and memory: A meta-analysis.British Journal of Psychology,84, 301–317.
Maylor, E. A., &Rabbitt, P. M. A. (1994). Applying Brinley plots to individuals: Effects of aging on performance distributions in two speeded tasks.Psychology & Aging,9, 224–230.
Miller, L. T., &Vernon, P. A. (1992). The general factor in short-term memory, intelligence, and reaction time.Intelligence,16, 5–29.
Myerson, J., &Adams, D. R. (1998). Mathematical and connectionist models of individual differences in processing speed.Abstracts of the Psychonomic Society,3, 49.
Myerson, J., Hale, S., Chen, J., &Lawrence, B. (1997). General lexical slowing and the semantic priming effect: The roles of age and ability.Acta Psychologica,96, 83–101.
Myerson, J., Lawrence, B. M., Hale, S., Jenkins, L., &Chen, J. (1998). General slowing of lexical and nonlexical information processing in dementia of the Alzheimer type.Aging, Neuropsychology, & Cognition,5, 1–12.
Myerson, J., Zheng, Y., &Hale, S. (1996). Multiplicative interaction of age and ability in individual speeded performance.Abstracts of the Psychonomic Society,1, 50.
Ratcliff, R., Spieler, D., &McKoon, G. (2000). Explicitly modeling the effects of aging on response time.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,7, 1–25.
Salthouse, T. A. (1996). The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition.Psychological Review,103, 403–428.
Schaie, K. W. (1989). Perceptual speed in adulthood: Cross-sectional and longitudinal studies.Psychology & Aging,4, 443–453.
Shimamura, A. P., Berry, J. M., Mangels, J. A., Rusting, C. L., &Jurica, P. J. (1995). Memory and cognitive abilities in university professors.Psychological Science,6, 271–277.
Sliwinski, M. J., &Hall, C. B. (1998). Task-dependent cognitive slowing in the elderly: A meta-analysis using hierarchical linear models with random coefficients.Psychology & Aging,13, 164–175.
Vernon, P. A., &Jensen, A. R. (1984). Individual and group differences in intelligence and speed of information processing.Personality & Individual Differences,5, 411–423.
White, D. A., Myerson, J., &Hale, S. (1997). How cognitive is psychomotor slowing in depression? Evidence from a meta-analysis.Aging, Neuropsychology, & Cognition,4, 166–174.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zheng, Y., Myerson, J. & Hale, S. Age and individual differences in visuospatial processing speed: Testing the magnification hypothesis. Psychon Bull Rev 7, 113–120 (2000). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210729
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210729