Log in

Residential mobility between cities and suburbs: race, suburbanization, and back-to-the-city moves

  • Migration, Ethnic Stratification, and Aging
  • Published:
Demography

Abstract

Information from the 1979 to 1985 waves of the Panel Study of Income Dynamics is merged with data on respondents’ tract and metropolitan area of residence to examine patterns and determinants of residential mobility between central cities and suburbs. Consistent with the life-cycle model of residential mobility, mobility in both directions declines with age, but on balance the presence of young children deters moving to the suburbs. Among blacks, education increases the probability of moving from cities to suburbs, while high income retains blacks and whites in suburbs. Consistent with the place stratification model. blacks are substantially less likely than whites to move from cities to suburbs, and substantially more likely to move from suburbs to cities, even after standardizing for racial differences in sociodemographic characteristics. High levels of violent crime and unemployment in cities relative to suburbs also tend to spur city-to-suburb mobility or inhibit suburb-to-city moves.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, T.K. 1991. Documentation for 1970 and 1980 Census Extract Datasets. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alba, R.D. and J.R. Logan. 1991. “Variations on Two Themes: Racial and Ethnic Patterns in the Attainment of Suburban Residence.” Demography 28:431–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1993. “Minority Proximity to Whites in Suburbs: An Individual-Level Analysis of Segregation.” American Journal of Sociology 98:1388–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alba, R.D., J.R. Logan, and P.E. Bellair. 1994. “Living with Crime: The Implications of Racial/Ethnic Differences in Suburban Location.” Social Forces 73:395–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bobo, L. and C.L. Zubrinsky. 1996. “Attitudes on Residential Integration: Perceived Status Differences, Mere In-Group Preference, or Racial Prejudice?” Social Forces 74:883–909.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bye, B.Y. and G.F. Riley. 1989. “Model Estimation When Observations Are Not Independent: Application of Liang and Zeger’s Methodology to Linear and Logistic Regression Analysis.” Sociological Methods and Research 17:353–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, W.A.Y. 1992. “Residential Preferences and Residential Choices in a Multiethnic Context.” Demography 29:451–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farley, R. 1991. “Residential Segregation of Social and Economic Groups Among Blacks, 1970-1980.” Pp. 274–98 in The Urban Underclass, edited by C. Jencks and P.E. Peterson. Washington, DC: Brookings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farley, R. and WH. Frey. 1994. “Changes in the Segregation of Whites from Blacks During the 1980s: Small Steps Toward a More Integrated Society.” American Sociological Review 59:23–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farley, R., C. Steeh, M. Krysan, T. Jackson, and K. Reeves. 1994. “Stereotypes and Segregation: Neighborhoods in the Detroit Area.” American Journal of Sociology 100:750–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Federal Bureau of Investigation. 1979–1981. Uniform Crime Reports. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, WH. 1978. “Population Movement and City-Suburb Redistribution: An Analytic Framework.” Demography 15:571–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1979. “Central City White Flight: Racial and Nonracial Causes.” American Sociological Review 44:425–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1985. “Mover Destination Selectivity and the Changing Suburbanization of Metropolitan Whites and Blacks.” Demography 22:223–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, WH. and F.E. Kobrin. 1982. “Changing Families and Changing Mobility: Their Impact on the Central City.” Demography 19:261–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, W.H. and A. Speare. 1988. Regional and Metropolitan Growth and Decline in the United States. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuguitt, G.Y. and D.L. Brown. 1990. “Residential Preferences and Population Redistribution: 1972-1988.” Demography 27:589–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gramlich, E., D. Laren, and N. Sealand. 1992. “Moving Into and Out of Poor Urban Areas.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 11:273–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guterbock, T.M. 1976. “The Push Hypothesis: Minority Presence, Crime, and Urban Deconcentration.” Pp. 137–61 in The Changing Face of the Suburbs, edited by B. Schwartz. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, M.S. 1992. The Panel Study of Income Dynamics: A User’s Guide. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasarda, J.D. 1988. “Jobs, Migration, and Emerging Urban Mismatches.” Pp. 148–98 in Urban Change and Poverty, edited by M.G.H. McGeary and L.E. Lynn. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1989. “Urban Industrial Transition and the Underclass.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 501:26–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landale, N.S. and A.M. Guest. 1985. “Constraints, Satisfaction and Residential Mobility: Speare’s Model Reconsidered.” Demography 22: 199–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, B.A., R.S. Oropesa, and J.W Kanan. 1994. “Neighborhood Context and Residential Mobility.” Demography 31:249–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liao, T.F. 1994. Interpreting Probability Models: Logit, Probit, and Other Generalized Linear Models. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liska, A.E. and P.E. Bellair. 1995. “Violent-Crime Rates and Racial Composition: Convergence Over Time.” American Journal of Sociology 101:578–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logan, J.R. and R.D. Alba. 1993. “Locational Returns to Human Capital: Minority Access to Suburban Community Resources.” Demography 30:243–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logan, J.R., R.D. Alba, and S. Leung. 1996. “Minority Access to White Suburbs: A Multiregional Comparison.” Social Forces 74:851–881.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logan, J.R., R.D. Alba, T. McNulty, and B. Fisher. 1996. “Making a Place in the Metropolis: Locational Attainment in Cities and Suburbs.” Demography 33:443–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logan, J.R. and M. Schneider. 1984. “Racial Segregation and Racial Change in American Suburbs, 1970–1980.” American Journal of Sociology 89:874–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long, L. 1972. “The Influence ofNumber and Ages of Children on Residential Mobility.” Demography 9:371–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1988. Migration and Residential Mobility in the United States. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madigan, T.J. and D.P. Hogan. 1991. “Kin Access and Residential Mobility among Young Mothers.” Social Science Quarterly 72:615–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, H. 1979. “White Movement to the Suburbs: A Comparison of Explanations.” American Sociological Review 44:975–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, H. and K. O’Flaherty. 1987. “Suburbanization in the Seventies: The ’Push-Pull’ Hypothesis Revisited.” Journal of Urban Affairs 9:249–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D.S. and N.A. Denton. 1987. “Trends in the Residential Segregation of Blacks, Hispanics, and Asians.” American Sociological Review 52:802–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1988. “Suburbanization and Segregation in U.S. Metropolitan Areas.” American Journal of Sociology 94:592–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1993. American Apartheid. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D.S., A.B. Gross, and K. Shibuya. 1994. “Migration, Segregation, and the Geographic Concentration of Poverty.” American Sociological Review 59:425–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McHugh, K.E., P. Gober, and N. Reid. 1990. “Determinants of Short- and Long-Term Mobility Expectations for Home Owners and Renters.” Demography 27:81–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nathan, R.P. and C.F. Adams. 1989. “Four Perspectives on Urban Hardship.” Political Science Quarterly 104:483–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, K.P. 1988. Gentrification and Distressed Cities: An Assessment of Trends in Intrametropolitan Migration. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, K.P. and J.G. Edwards. 1993. “Intra-Urban Mobility and Location Choice in the 1980s.” Pp. 53–95 in Housing Markets and Residential Mobility, edited by G.T. Kingsley and M.A. Turner. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palen, J.J. 1995. The Suburbs. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, P.H. 1955. Why Families Move. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R.J. and J.D. Wooldredge. 1986. “Evidence That High Crime Rates Encourage Migration Away from Central Cities.” Sociology and Social Research 70:310–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, M. and T. Phelan. 1993. “Black Suburbanization in the 1980s.” Demography 30:269–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shlay, A.B. 1988. “Not in That Neighborhood: The Effects ofHousing and Population on the Distribution of Mortgage Finance within the Chicago SMSA from 1980-1983.” Social Science Research 17:137–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shlay, A.B. and P.H. Rossi. 1981. “Kee** Up the Neighborhood: Estimating Net Effects of Zoning.” American Sociological Review 46:703–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • South, S.J. and G.D. Deane. 1993. “Race and Residential Mobility: Individual Determinants and Structural Constraints.” Social Farces 72:147–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Speare, A., Jr., S. Goldstein, and W.H. Frey. 1975. Residential Mobility, Migration, and Metropolitan Change. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiebout, C. 1956. “A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures.” Journal of Political Economy 64:416–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tienda, M. 1991. “Poor People and Poor Places: Deciphering Neighborhood Effects on Poverty Outcomes.” Pp. 244–62 in Macro-Micra Linkages in Sociology, edited by J. Huber. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Bureau of the Census. 1982. State and Metropolitan Area Data Book 1982. Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, F.D. 1979. Residential Consumption, Economic Opportunity, and Race. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winship, C. and L. Radbill. 1994. “Sampling Weights and Regression Analysis.” Sociological Methods and Research 23:230–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yinger, J. 1995. Closed Doors, Opportunities Lost: The Continuing Costs of Housing Discrimination. New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Scott J. South.

Additional information

This research was supported by grants from the National Science Foundation (SBR-95 I 1732, SBR-95 I2290). We acknowledge the helpful comments and advice of Glenn Deane, Stewart Tolnay, and several anonymous Demography reviewers.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

South, S.J., Crowder, K.D. Residential mobility between cities and suburbs: race, suburbanization, and back-to-the-city moves. Demography 34, 525–538 (1997). https://doi.org/10.2307/3038307

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3038307

Keywords

Navigation