Abstract
Objectives
In 2015, Ontario partially deregulated alcohol sales by allowing grocery stores to sell alcohol. The purpose of this study was to evaluate (1) whether neighbourhood-level socioeconomic status (SES) impacted the likelihood that a grocery store began selling alcohol, and (2) whether increases in alcohol retail availability following deregulation differed between neighbourhoods based on SES.
Methods
This was a repeated cross-sectional analysis of 1062 grocery stores in 17,096 neighbourhoods in urban Ontario. The association between neighbourhood-level SES and whether a grocery store began selling alcohol was modeled using mixed effect logistic regression. The annual change in drive-distance from a neighbourhood to the closest off-premise alcohol outlet between 2015 and 2020 was modeled using mixed effect linear regression. An interaction between time and SES was included to evaluate whether this change differed between neighbourhoods based on SES.
Results
Grocery stores in neighbourhoods in the lowest SES quintile were 39% less likely to start selling alcohol than grocery stores in neighbourhoods in the highest SES quintile (odds ratio (OR): 0.61, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.39–0.94). As grocery store sales expanded, the distance to the closest off-premise alcohol outlet decreased by 51.8 m annually (95% CI: 48.8–54.9, p < 0.01). A significant interaction between year and SES was observed whereby this trend was more pronounced in high- versus low-SES neighbourhoods.
Conclusion
The expansion of grocery store alcohol sales increased alcohol availability, but this increase was proportionately larger in high- versus low-SES neighbourhoods. This reduced historic disparities in alcohol availability between low- and high-SES neighbourhoods.
Résumé
Objectifs
En 2015, l’Ontario a partiellement déréglementé les ventes d’alcool en autorisant les épiceries à en vendre. Notre étude visait à évaluer : 1) si le statut socioéconomique (SSE) du quartier avait un effet sur la probabilité qu’une épicerie commence à vendre de l’alcool et 2) si les augmentations de l’accessibilité de l’alcool au détail après la déréglementation différaient d’un quartier à l’autre selon le SSE.
Méthode
Il s’agissait d’une analyse transversale répétée de 1 062 épiceries dans 17 096 quartiers urbains de l’Ontario. L’association entre le SSE du quartier et le fait qu’une épicerie commence ou non à vendre de l’alcool a été modélisée par régression logistique à effets mixtes. Le changement annuel de la distance de conduite entre un quartier et le point de vente d’alcool hors site le plus proche entre 2015 et 2020 a été modélisé par régression linéaire à effets mixtes. Une interaction entre le temps et le SSE a été incluse pour évaluer si le changement différait d’un quartier à l’autre selon le SSE.
Résultats
Les épiceries des quartiers du quintile SSE le plus défavorisé ont été de 39 points de pourcentage moins susceptibles de commencer à vendre de l’alcool que les épiceries des quartiers du quintile SSE le plus favorisé (rapport de cotes [RC] : 0,61, intervalle de confiance de 95 % [(IC] : 0,39-0,94). Avec l’expansion des ventes des épiceries, la distance jusqu’au point de vente d’alcool hors site le plus proche a diminué de 51,8 mètres par année (IC de 95 % : 48,8-54,9, p < 0,01). Une interaction significative entre l’année et le SSE a été observée : cette tendance était plus prononcée dans les quartiers de SSE élevé que dans les quartiers de faible SSE.
Conclusion
L’expansion des ventes d’alcool des épiceries a fait augmenter l’accessibilité de l’alcool, mais cette augmentation a été proportionnellement plus grande dans les quartiers de SSE élevé que dans les quartiers de faible SSE. Cela a réduit les disparités historiques d’accessibilité de l’alcool entre les quartiers de SSE élevé et de faible SSE.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.17269%2Fs41997-022-00694-w/MediaObjects/41997_2022_694_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.17269%2Fs41997-022-00694-w/MediaObjects/41997_2022_694_Fig2_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
A portion of the data used in this study is publicly available.
References
Austin, P. C. (2009). Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensity-score matched samples. Statistics in Medicine, 28(25), 3083–3107. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.3697
Bates, D., Sarkar, D., Bates, M. D., & Matrix, L. (2007). The lme4 package. R package version, 2(1), 74.
Beard, E., Brown, J., West, R., Angus, C., Brennan, A., Holmes, J., et al. (2016). Deconstructing the alcohol harm paradox: A population based survey of adults in England. PLoS One, 11(9), e0160666.
Bloomfield, K. (2020). Understanding the alcohol-harm paradox: What next? The Lancet Public Health, 5(6), e300–e301.
Brennan, M., McGregor, B., & Buckland, J. (2011). The changing structure of inner-city retail banking: Examining bank branch and payday loan outlet locations in Winnipeg, 1980-2009. Canadian Journal of Urban Research, 20(1), 1–32.
Campbell, C. A., Hahn, R. A., Elder, R., Brewer, R., Chattopadhyay, S., Fielding, J., et al. (2009). The effectiveness of limiting alcohol outlet density as a means of reducing excessive alcohol consumption and alcohol-related harms. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 37(6), 556–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2009.09.028
Canadian Substance Use Costs and Harms Scientific Working Group. (2020). Canadian substance use costs and harms 2015–2017. (Prepared by the Canadian Institute for Substance Use Research and the Canadian Centre on Substance Use and Addiction.) Canadian Centre on Substance Use and Addiction.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2017). Guide for measuring alcohol outlet density. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, US Dept of Health and Human Services.
Crépault, J.-F. (2020). The Alcohol Policy Framework by the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health: A proposal for a public health approach to alcohol policy. Canadian Journal of Addiction, 11(4), 13–16.
Esri Inc. (2019). ArcGIS Pro. (2.4.0 ed.): Esri Inc.
Estill, A., Glen, H., Albanese, S., & Liem, S. (2018). Alcohol policy review: Opportunities for Ontario municipalities.
Foster, S., Hooper, P., Divitini, M., Knuiman, M., & Trapp, G. (2020). Over the limit? Testing non-linear associations between alcohol outlets and young adults’ alcohol consumption. Drug and Alcohol Review, 39(6), 664–670.
Griswold, M. G., Fullman, N., Hawley, C., Arian, N., Zimsen, S. R., Tymeson, H. D., et al. (2018). Alcohol use and burden for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2016: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. The Lancet, 392(10152), 1015–1035.
Gruenewald, P. J. (2011). Regulating availability: How access to alcohol affects drinking and problems in youth and adults. Alcohol Research: Current Reviews. 34(2), 248–256.
Hahn, R. A., Middleton, J. C., Elder, R., Brewer, R., Fielding, J., Naimi, T. S., et al. (2012). Effects of alcohol retail privatization on excessive alcohol consumption and related harms: A community guide systematic review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 42(4), 418–427.
Lee, J. P., Ponicki, W., Mair, C., Gruenewald, P., & Ghanem, L. (2020). What explains the concentration of off-premise alcohol outlets in Black neighborhoods? SSM-Population Health, 12, 100669.
Livingston, M. (2008). Alcohol outlet density and assault: A spatial analysis. Addiction, 103(4), 619–628.
Livingston, M. (2011). Alcohol outlet density and harm: Comparing the impacts on violence and chronic harms. Drug and Alcohol Review, 30(5), 515–523.
Livingston, M. (2012). The social gradient of alcohol availability in Victoria, Australia. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 36(1), 41–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-6405.2011.00776.x
Luan, H., Minaker, L. M., & Law, J. (2016). Do marginalized neighbourhoods have less healthy retail food environments? An analysis using Bayesian spatial latent factor and hurdle models. International Journal of Health Geographics, 15(1), 1–16.
Matheson, F., & Van Ingen, T. (2016). Ontario marginalization index user guide. St. Michael’s Hospital.
Minaker, L. M., Shuh, A., Olstad, D. L., Engler-Stringer, R., Black, J. L., & Mah, C. L. (2016). Retail food environments research in Canada: A sco** review. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 107(1), eS4–eS13.
Morrison, C., Gruenewald, P. J., & Ponicki, W. R. (2015). Socioeconomic determinants of exposure to alcohol outlets. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 76(3), 439–446.
Myran, D. T., Chen, J. T., Bearnot, B., Ip, M., Giesbrecht, N., & Rees, V. W. (2019a). Alcohol availability across neighborhoods in Ontario following alcohol sales deregulation, 2013-2017. American Journal of Public Health, 109(6), 899–905. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2019.305014
Myran, D. T., Chen, J. T., Giesbrecht, N., & Rees, V. W. (2019b). The association between alcohol access and alcohol-attributable emergency department visits in Ontario, Canada. Addiction, 114(7), 1183–1191. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.14597
Myran, D. T., Hsu, A. T., Smith, G., & Tanuseputro, P. (2019c). Rates of emergency department visits attributable to alcohol use in Ontario from 2003 to 2016: A retrospective population-level study. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 191(29), E804–e810. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.181575
Myran, D., Hsu, A., Kunkel, E., Rhodes, E., Imsirovic, H., & Tanuseputro, P. (2021). Socioeconomic and geographic disparities in emergency department visits due to alcohol in Ontario: A retrospective population-level study from 2003 to 2017: Disparités Socio-Économiques et Géographiques Dans les Visites au Service D’urgence en raison de L’alcool en Ontario: Une étude Rétrospective Dans la Population, de 2003 à 2017. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 07067437211027321.
Ontario Public Health Association. (2018). OPHA issue series: Controlling physical availability of alcohol. Toronto, Ontario.
Sherk, A., Stockwell, T., Chikritzhs, T., Andréasson, S., Angus, C., Gripenberg, J., et al. (2018). Alcohol consumption and the physical availability of take-away alcohol: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of the days and hours of sale and outlet density. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 79(1), 58–67.
Smith, K., & Foster, J. (2014). Alcohol, health inequalities and the harm paradox: Why some groups face greater problems despite consuming less alcohol. Institute of Alcohol Studies.
Stockwell, T., Zhao, J., Macdonald, S., Pakula, B., Gruenewald, P., & Holder, H. (2009). Changes in per capita alcohol sales during the partial privatization of British Columbia’s retail alcohol monopoly 2003–2008: A multi-level local area analysis. Addiction, 104(11), 1827–1836.
Stockwell, T., Zhao, J., Martin, G., Macdonald, S., Vallance, K., Treno, A., et al. (2013). Minimum alcohol prices and outlet densities in British Columbia, Canada: Estimated impacts on alcohol-attributable hospital admissions. American Journal of Public Health, 103(11), 2014–2020.
Trangenstein, P. J., Gray, C., Rossheim, M. E., Sadler, R., & Jernigan, D. H. (2020). Alcohol outlet clusters and population disparities. Journal of Urban Health, 97(1), 123–136.
Treno, A. J., Gruenewald, P. J., & Johnson, F. W. (2001). Alcohol availability and injury: The role of local outlet densities. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 25(10), 1467–1471.
von Bergmann, J., Shkolnik, D., & Jacobs, A. (2021). cancensus: R package to access, retrieve, and work with Canadian Census data and geography. R package version 0.4. 0.
Wagenaar, A. C., & Langley, J. D. (1995). Alcohol licensing system changes and alcohol consumption: Introduction of wine into New Zealand grocery stores. Addiction, 90(6), 773–783.
White, E. (2022). Sudbury grocer abandons alcohol sales and industry association says it won’t be the last. (January 18, 2022, CBC News).
Wickham, H. (2011). ggplot2. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics, 3(2), 180–185.
Code availability
Available on request.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
EF and DM conceptualized the study. EF, ES, and DM collected and analyzed the data. EF and ES wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
ESM 1
(DOCX 133 kb)
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Friesen, E.L., Staykov, E. & Myran, D.T. Understanding the association between neighbourhood socioeconomic status and grocery store alcohol sales following market liberalization in Ontario, Canada. Can J Public Health 114, 254–263 (2023). https://doi.org/10.17269/s41997-022-00694-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17269/s41997-022-00694-w