Log in

Analysis of the Understanding and Worry about Lymphedema of Patients with Breast Cancer

  • Breast Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Lymphedema is a potential lifelong sequela of breast cancer treatment. We sought to: (1) evaluate the worry and knowledge of patients about lymphedema, (2) quantify patients reporting lymphedema education and screening, and (3) determine willingness to participate in lymphedema screening and prevention programs.

Patients and Methods

A survey evaluating lymphedema-related knowledge and worry was sent to patients treated for stage 0–III breast cancer. Exclusion criteria included > 10 years since diagnosis, missing clinical staging, and those without axillary surgery. Responses were linked with clinicopathologic information.

Results

Of 141 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 89% of those without lymphedema were not at all or slightly worried about lymphedema. Higher levels of worry were associated with clinical stage II–III disease [odds ratio (OR) 2.63, p = 0.03], a history of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) (OR 4.58, p < 0.01), and employment (OR 2.21, p = 0.05). A total of 102 (72%) patients recalled receiving lymphedema education. Lymphedema knowledge was limited, with < 25% of respondents answering > 50% of the risk factor questions correctly. Worry and knowledge were not significantly associated. Of patients without lymphedema, 36% were interested in learning more about lymphedema and 64% were willing to participate in or learn more about a screening program. Most (66%) felt that lymphedema information should be provided before and after cancer treatment.

Discussion

A majority of our breast cancer survivors had limited knowledge about lymphedema risk factors. While most patients were not worried about develo** lymphedema, higher worry was seen in patients with a higher clinical stage at diagnosis, ALND, and employment. Our findings suggest potential targets and timing for patient-centered educational interventions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Heins MJ, de Ligt KM, Verloop J, Siesling S, Korevaar JC, PSCCR group. Adverse health effects after breast cancer up to 14 years after diagnosis. Breast. 2022;61:22–8.

  2. Rockson SG. Lymphedema after breast cancer treatment. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:1937–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Asdourian MS, Swaroop MN, Sayegh HE, et al. Association between precautionary behaviors and breast cancer-related lymphedema in patients undergoing bilateral surgery. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35:3934–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hoyle E, Kilbreath S, Dylke E. Body image and sexuality concerns in women with breast cancer-related lymphedema: a cross-sectional study. Support Care Cancer. 2022; online ahead of print.

  5. Paskett ED, Dean JA, Oliveri JM, Harrop JP. Cancer-related lymphedema risk factors, diagnosis, treatment, and impact: a review. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:3726–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Boyages J, Kalfa S, Xu Y, et al. Worse and worse off: the impact of lymphedema on work and career after breast surgery. SpringerPlus. 2016;5:657–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Shaitelman SF, Cromwell KD, Rasmussen JC, et al. Recent progress in cancer-related lymphedema treatment and prevention. CA: Cancer J Clin. 2015;65(1):55–81.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Armer JM, Ballman KV, McCall L, et al. Factors associated with lymphedema in women with node-positive breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and axillary dissection. JAMA Surg. 2019;154(9):800–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Byun HK, Kim JS, Chang JS, et al. Validation of a nomogram for predicting the risk of lymphedema following contemporary treatment for breast cancer: a large multi-institutional study (KROG 20-05). Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2002; online ahead of print.

  10. Ferguson CM, Swaroop MN, Horick N, et al. Impact of ipsilateral blood draws, injections, blood pressure measurements, and air travel on the risk of lymphedema for patients treated for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2015;34:691–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tsai RJ, Dennis LK, Lynch CF, Snetselaar LG, Zamba GKD, Scott-Conner C. The risk of develo** arm lymphedema among breast cancer survivors: a meta-analysis of treatment factors. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:1959–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. McLaughlin SA, Staley AC, Vicini F, et al. Considerations for clinicians in the diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of breast cancer-related lymphedema: recommendations from a multidisciplinary expert ASBrS panel. Part 1: definitions, assessments, education, and future directions. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24:2818–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Naoum GE, Roberts S, Brunelle CL, et al. Quantifying the impact of axillary surgery and nodal irradiation on breast cancer-related lymphedema and local tumor control: long-term results from a prospective screening trial. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(29):3430–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bryant JR, Hajjar RT, Lumley C, Chaiyasate K. Clinical inquiry—in women who have undergone breast cancer surgery, including lymph node removal, do blood pressure measurements taken in the ipsilateral arm increase the risk of lymphedema? J Okla State Med Assoc. 2016;109(11):529–31.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Cemal Y, Pusic A, Mehrara BJ. Preventive measures for lymphedema: separating fact from fiction. J Am Coll Surg. 2011;213(4):543–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. McLaughlin SA, DeSnyder SM, Klimberg S, et al. Considerations for clinicians in the diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of breast cancer-related lymphedema, recommendations from an expert panel: part 2: preventive and therapeutic options. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24:2827–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wanchai A, Armer JM. Effects of weight-lifting or resistance exercise on breast cancer-related lymphedema: a systematic review. Int J Nurs Sci. 2019;6:92–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Armer JM, Radina ME, Porock D, Culbertson SD. Predicting breast cancer-related lymphedema using self-reported symptoms. Nurs Res. 2003;52(6):370–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Janz NK, Hawley ST, Mujahid MS, et al. Correlates of worry about recurrence in a multiethnic population-based sample of women with breast cancer. Cancer. 2011;117(9):1827–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lizarraga IM, Schroeder MC, Jatoi I, et al. Surgical decision-making surrounding contralateral prophylactic mastectomy: comparison of treatment goals, preferences, and psychosocial outcomes from a multicenter survey of breast cancer patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021;28(13):8752–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Tsai RJ, Dennis LK, Lynch CF, Snetselaar LG, Zamba GKD, Scott-Conner C. Lymphedema following breast cancer: the importance of surgical methods and obesity. J Womens Health. 2018;3(2):1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Jammallo LS, Miller CL, Horick NK, et al. Factors associated with fear of lymphedema after treatment for breast cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2014;41(5):473–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Rafn BS, Christensen J, Larsen A, Bloomquist K. Prospective surveillance for breast cancer-related arm lymphedema: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2022; online ahead of print.

  24. Cansiz G, Donmez AA, Kapucu S, Borman P. The effect of a self-management lymphedema education program on lymphedema, lymphedema-related symptoms, patient compliance, daily living activities and patient activation in patients with breast cancer-related lymphedema: a quasi-experimental study. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2022; online ahead of print.

  25. Runowicz CD, Leach CR, Henry NL, et al. American Cancer Society/American Society of Clinical Oncology breast cancer survivorship care guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(6):611–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Cortina CS, Yen TWF, Bergom C, et al. Breast cancer-related lymphedema rates after modern axillary treatments: how accurate are our estimates? Surgery. 2022;171:682–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ingrid M. Lizarraga MBBS.

Ethics declarations

Disclosure

Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health under award number P30CA086862. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. Research reported in this publication was supported by the Patients Enhancing Research Collaboration at Holden Program (IRB 201708847) facilitated by the Biospecimen Procurement and Molecular Epidemiology Resource Core (BioMER) at the Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Uhlmann, R.A., Mott, S.L., Curry, M. et al. Analysis of the Understanding and Worry about Lymphedema of Patients with Breast Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 29, 6428–6437 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-022-12189-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-022-12189-6

Navigation